RETRANS

Big Retrans Win For Broadcasters

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler says a commission review of retrans proceedings made it clear that “more rules in this area are not what we need at this point. So, today I announce that we will not proceed at this time to adopt additional rules governing good faith negotiations for retransmission consent.”

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler has decided that the current “good faith” retransmission consent rules are good enough.

In a blog post today, Wheeler noted that in the STELA Reauthorization Act of 2014, “Congress expressed concern about the harm consumers suffer when negotiations fail and sought-after broadcast programming is blacked out on their pay TV service. STELAR directed the commission to initiate a rulemaking to consider possible revisions to our ‘totality of the circumstances’ test.”

Wheeler said that the review of all the procedures showed that “more rules in this area are not what we need at this point. So, today I announce that we will not proceed at this time to adopt additional rules governing good faith negotiations for retransmission consent.”

However, he added: “this does not mean the FCC will turn a blind eye to disputes. Nor does it mean that Congress couldn’t expand the scope of the commission’s authority in this space.”

Wheeler continued: “There is nothing in the record that suggests that our current totality of the circumstances test, which is intentionally broad, is inadequate to address the negotiating practices of broadcast stations or MVPDs in the marketplace today. Though commenters complained about a variety of negotiating practices, none showed that those practices are the causes of the blackouts that occur. Further, a number of the practices complained of were said to have been engaged in by a single negotiating party or in a small number of negotiations and do not appear to be gaining currency in the marketplace.”

What we need, Wheeler added, “is not more rules, but for both sides in retransmission consent negotiations to take seriously their responsibility to consumers, who expect to watch their preferred broadcast programming without interruption and to receive the subscription TV service for which they pay.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

“This isn’t pie in the sky. Many broadcasters and MVPDs take that responsibility seriously and conclude hundreds of retransmission consent deals without interruption. And this process is entirely invisible to their viewers — as it should be.

Wells Fargo analyst Marci Ryvicker was encouraged by the news: “We view this as a positive for the broadcasters and the diversified O&O (owned and operated) stations. While we understand the FCC is still going to watch retrans negotiations carefully, we do think today’s statements remove some uncertainty for these stocks.”

And NAB EVP of Communications Dennis Wharton said: “NAB appreciates the significant work undertaken by Chairman Wheeler and the FCC staff to conduct an exhaustive review of the retransmission consent process, and applauds its conclusion that no new rules are needed. As Chairman Wheeler acknowledges, the vast majority of these negotiations are successfully concluded without incident or impasse. Broadcasters remain fully committed to reaching agreements with pay TV companies in good faith so that consumers can continue to receive our high-quality local content whether over the air or through a pay TV service.”

American Cable Association CEO Matthew M. Polka said: “ACA is shocked and appalled that FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, who has placed such urgency in reducing consumer confusion in the marketplace, has decided to leave unchanged the retransmission consent regime that a bipartisan Congress asked the agency to review in the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act Reauthorization Act of 2014. To do so in the face of historic numbers of broadcast blackouts and clear signs of market failure and widespread consumer harm is stunning. The chairman’s decision ignores the plight of millions of consumers served by MVPDs who have repeatedly been victimized by broadcasters’ heavy-handed bargaining tactics, such as pulling signals prior to a marquee event like the Oscars or baseball’s All-Star game.

“In the end,” Polka continue, “the chairman’s decision will serve no purpose other than to perpetuate and most likely escalate negotiating schemes that will result in consumer harm on a colossal scale by ignoring tangible evidence that the retransmission consent regime is broken, outdated, and contributing to the skyrocketing increase in retransmission consent payments and a record number of TV-station initiated signal blackouts.”


Comments (9)

Leave a Reply

Steve Ingram says:

July 14, 2016 at 1:04 pm

Kudos to the FCC for seeing through the preposterous claims made by the likes of Dish, DIRECTV and (the former) Time Warner. Wasn’t it Shakespeare who said “Me thinks thou dost protest too much”.

michael marcus says:

July 14, 2016 at 4:54 pm

Mr. Polka, the cable companies built an industry on the checkbooks of broadcasters for decades. Can’t we all just get along? Your comment was a little insincere.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    July 14, 2016 at 5:27 pm

    Considering the ACA Members only represent 7Million subs, or around 7% of MVPD subs, what does it matter? Many MVPDs or a legit Organization such as the NCTA should have been contacted for comments instead.

    Veronica Serrano Padilla says:

    July 14, 2016 at 6:39 pm

    @Jim Laura: Naturally broadcasters never wanted to be on cable.. oh, wait, they’re the ones who got Must Carry rules enacted…. oops, so much for that story…

    Veronica Serrano Padilla says:

    July 14, 2016 at 6:42 pm

    @Insider: always love your smug arrogance… like 7 million subs (18 million people or so) don’t matter or have a say… (Hey, and this website even gives you, an anonymous coward, a say…)

    Wagner Pereira says:

    July 14, 2016 at 9:26 pm

    There you go making up BS again. Never said 7 million subs don’t matter. But by using your logic, the Libertarian Candidate for President is the best to comment on USA Issues. Also glad I don’t work in a pissant part time SD Cable channel that no one watches and no concept of reality. Would rather work where real thing matter and I can’t post under my real name!

    Veronica Serrano Padilla says:

    July 15, 2016 at 10:45 am

    Hey Mr. No-Reading Comprehension… I never said ACA should speak for everyone, only that they and their subscribers deserved a voice. YOU are the one stated they were not a “legit organization.” Your analogy is almost as off base as your “40 Acres and a Mule” schtick. And glad that you finally admit that not only are you a cowardly, anonymous poster, but one who goldbricks on his/her/its employer’s time.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    July 15, 2016 at 12:37 pm

    Once again making up BS. You cannot stop. Try reading the ACA Mission Statement, IRS Code Listing and then look at their actions. But of course you would do anything to bash REAL BROADCASTERS. And luckily, my employer does allow me breaks and lunch – as well as the opportunity to go home at night. Sorry you don’t believe in those basic employee benefits. Speaks more to you as an employer.

Dale Godfrey says:

July 14, 2016 at 5:23 pm

Hooray!! At last a government bureaucracy (FCC) who says, “no additio
nal regulations.” Figure it out. Cable and satellite people don’t like it when signals are pulled? Tough, baby. You’re only encouraging use of rooftop antennae, seeking alternate sources for the internet, and more cord cutting! Go find one of those cut cords and hang yourselves if you’re that uncomfortable.