JESSELL AT LARGE

Dish-Disney Deal Bodes Well For Affiliates

The agreement is the first step toward Dish offering a cable-like service online, but before it launches it's going to need similar deals with the ABC affiliates as well as with CBS, Fox, NBC and their affiliates. All the affiliates stand to make a little more on retrans and they get their signals onto the Internet where they can be watched by young viewers on mobile devices.

The Dish-Disney deal got a lot of media play last week, but none of the coverage I saw considered the impact on network affiliates. I guess that is my job.

With the various Disney programming services as charter tenants, Dish plans to launch an online video service that would be the functional equivalent of cable TV circa 1989. It will comprise a bunch a cable networks and the local broadcast signals and sell for $20-$30 a month.

Dish believes such a service will appeal to young people. “We think there is a group of individuals, 18-to-34-year-olds, who would love to have a lower-cost product with some of the top content out there,” David Shull, Dish’s chief commercial officer told Bloomberg. “That’s who we’ll be targeting.”

There will be a few significant differences between cable 1989 and Dish online 2014, however. Dish will not have to worry about stringing wires or installing set-top boxes. It will use the Internet to pump out the service and subscribers will supply their own receivers in the form of computers — desktops, laptops, tablets and smartphones. The service will also include VOD, which really wasn’t practical 25 years ago.

The service goes beyond the online TV Everywhere service that ABC has been slowly rolling out over the past year in cooperation with some MVPDs. TV Everywhere is similar in nature, but restricted to paying cable and satellite subscribers.

The new service that Dish envisions has no bounds. With its satellite TV service stuck at 14 million subs, it can now start fishing with new bait for subscribers among the other 102 million TV homes. And it can do it without an enormous capital investment in a distribution system.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

But for Dish to get from press release to market it is going to need more programming. Its deal with Disney includes ESPN, the Disney Channel, ABC Family and the ABC O&Os. But as good as those channels are, they are far from sufficient. Dish will have to cut similar multichannel deals with the likes of CBS, Fox, NBCUniversal, Viacom and Turner.

Most of all, it is going to need agreements with major network affiliates. Just as in 1989, you really can’t offer a multichannel programming service of any kind without the local ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox broadcast signals. Then and now, they are the cornerstones.

In a conference call this week, ABC reassured its affiliates that it is not bypassing them, that its deal with Dish for broadcast signals covers only its eight O&Os markets. In fact, ABC said, its deal should serve as a model for affiliates that want to be a part of the new Dish service.

This is all good news. It means that Dish may be soon be approaching ABC affiliates (and eventually other affiliates) about reopening retrans agreements to include local streaming rights. The affiliates stand to make a little more on retrans and they get their signals onto the Internet where they can be watched on mobile platforms where many young viewers live.

In these negotiations, the affiliates should keep in mind that others will likely come calling with offers for online rights. In January, Verizon announced that it had purchased Intel’s inchoate service, which sounds a lot like Dish’s. Other MVPDs cannot be far behind. Don’t be shy about playing one off against the other, and don’t sell exclusive rights cheap.

Dish will come to the table with some extra leverage of its own.

Remember the AutoHop? That’s the Dish DVR feature that allows satellite TV subscribers to record automatically all of broadcast primetime and then play it back without the commercials. Recognizing the threat to their principal revenue stream, the broadcast networks have been challenging in court Dish’s right to offer the service.

The new omnibus deal includes a settlement under which Disney drops its suit and Dish agrees to disable its AutoHop ad-stripping feature for three days after a program airs. However, the deal is limited, I am told. It applies only to the ABC O&Os. If affiliates want to block AutoHop in their markets, they are going to have to negotiate for that concession just as Disney did.

A note of caution: If media history tells us anything, it’s that Dish may cheat by stretching the market boundaries of the ABC O&Os and affiliates with which it does make deals. Keep in mind that the wily Charlie Ergen is still running Dish.

If Dish gets its service up and running, I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that it is authorizing subscribers to receive WABC New York in Scranton, Pa., and Hartford, Conn., and ignoring the ABC affiliates in those markets.

I’m not sure what affiliates can do about this other than to make sure that their markets are clearly defined for online purposes and then to be vigilant for distant signals popping up on their turf. The courts are a slow and costly enforcement mechanism. Maybe the networks can help by insisting that Dish honor market boundaries.

Another factor is Aereo. If Aereo prevails in court, Dish could license the technology and use it to pick up affiliates and include them in its service without permission or payment from affiliates. Fortunately, the legal tide seems to be turning against Aereo.

The day when “cable TV” will jump from coax to the Internet and our smartphones is fast approaching. It’s comforting to know that broadcasting will still be a big part of it. How could it not?

Harry A. Jessell is editor of TVNewsCheck. He can be contacted at 973-701-1067 or [email protected]. You can read earlier columns here.


Comments (2)

Leave a Reply

Matthew Castonguay says:

March 14, 2014 at 4:53 pm

Well put Harry – very good analysis. BTW, there are tools to limit the distribution to DMAs, and I believe the syndicator contracts the ABC O&Os have will likely require they be implemented.

Cheryl Daly says:

March 14, 2014 at 5:35 pm

One other difference from 1989: back then cable TV cost $13.85 a month. Dish’s $20-$30 a month online service will require one of the higher tiers of internet service to deliver a quality stream. That higher-speed tier currently costs upward of $50 a month. If Dish pays a premium to the Comcasts of the world so that its stream won’t be throttled (as Netflix has paid extra), that premium will be passed along to the customer as well. Add in the annual price increases for programming that Dish has been known to announce just about every February, and this online video service will soon cost about what a cable TV bill is today, $100+ a month. Cord-cutters have commented online that the primary reason that they cut the cord and got an antenna was to free themselves from the $100-$150 monthly cable bill. Will 18-to-34-year-olds, many of whom are underemployed and not flush with a lot of disposable income, suddenly want to pay $100 a month to get internet-delivered TV when that price point is what drove them to ditch cable or never subscribe to it?