EXECUTIVE SESSION WITH COLLEEN BROWN

Drilling Down To Find New Local Ad Rev

Fisher Communications CEO Colleen Brown explains how her company's TV stations are using hyperlocal websites to attract new advertisers -- over 1,000 so far -- anxious to reach customers on the neighborhood level. In fact, she's so enthusiastic that Fisher has invested in DataSphere Technologies, the firm that markets the online platform her stations use.

Last week at Borrell Associates’ Local Online Advertising Conference in New York, Fisher Communications CEO Colleen Brown was honored as Innovator of the Year for the TV group’s headlong plunge into hyperlocal online media.

Since last August, Fisher has launched more than 100 neighborhood sites in four of its TV station markets — Seattle; Portland and Eugene, Ore.; Bakersfields, Calif.; and Boise, Idaho — and brought more than 1,000 new advertisers into the fold.

With her top online executive, Troy McGuire, and a capable online platform built by DataSphere Technologies, Brown intends to keep expanding the service to Fisher’s four other TV markets and hundreds of more neighborhoods.

In this interview with TVNewsCheck Editor Harry A. Jessell, Brown talks about how Fisher hyperlocal got started, how it works and how nickels do add up.

(For NetNewsCheck.com’s complete coverage of last week’s Local Online Advertising Conference, where Fisher’s Colleen Brown was honored for the company’s hyperlocal online strategy, click here.)

An edited transcript:

BRAND CONNECTIONS

Where did the idea for the hyperlocal sites come from and how long did it take to go from the idea to the marketplace?

It came out of our 2006 strategic plan. We identified that it would be hard to get bigger nationally, but that it would be easy for us to look inward and super-serve our markets. We didn’t know what that meant yet. That was just an objective.

And how did you go from that objective to the launch last summer?

There were four riddles we needed to solve: The first was, how do we use more of the content that comes into the stations. We did a week’s survey and we determined that approximately 80% of the material coming in couldn’t be used because it was too narrow in scope. We were wasting a good portion of what we had.

In addition, we had all this long-tail stuff after 60-some years of TV broadcasting. We had a lot of information that we couldn’t monetize.

The next point was how to use our existing staff to start moving into multiplatforming. So we had to change the mindset of most of our employees. You’d think it would be a big hurdle, but ultimately they’ve really embraced it and run with it. There has been a complete paradigm shift because they publish 24/7 now.

Then the last piece: In the past, we could not find a way to make these kinds of efforts monetizable, in part because the cost per sale was too great to dedicate any kind of real sales resources to it.

By working with DataSphere and its tele-sales operation, we’ve been able to solve these big riddles that were stumping us.

Tell me about DataSphere.

DataSphere is a three-year-old private company that developed technology for the global real estate market, for selling real estate through sites like LandWatch and ResortScape.

When I moved here, they asked me to be on their board and I joined to keep my Internet skills sharp. I wasn’t in there very long before I realized their technology was a solution to our media problems. This is somebody that dealt with vast numbers of properties around the world just as we dealt with vast numbers of media stories from across our markets, not to mention across the years. They had found a way to bring order to it all in an affordable way, without a human touching it. So we just adapted their technology, applied it to media and we have been running with it ever since.

You mentioned that the advertising is sold through DataSphere’s tele-marketing operation. How does that work?

They’ve got very informed sales people who are polished and respectful. They say they represent KOMO News and they’re calling to talk to them about their Internet strategy and would they like to advertise on our neighborhood sites. The success rate in very high. Most of these advertisers don’t even have a website. Many of these advertisers need help in developing their message.

It allows us to develop many advertisers who are clearly recognizing our brand, know we’re not going anywhere and would like to do business with us.

You have more than 100 sites now. Are the sites profitable at this point?

Altogether, it is profitable. Some become profitable right away; others take a little more time. The hard thing is to understand when you come from mass media is that this is about literally rolling up the nickels. This is really about selling very small advertisers at price points they can afford, multiplied by more than 100 multiplied by 12 months. It’s that exponential mass that makes it become meaningful.

What are the total revenues?

I can’t say because we’re a public company and I have not released that yet. We are certainly in the zone of profitability with no issue there. The size is meaningful enough that we have decided we are going to invest a small amount in DataSphere and participate more heavily in guiding the development of the product.

You see this as a bigger business than your conventional station-branded sites?

What I have said is that as of last October hyperlocal was already 25% of our Internet business.

Well, it sounds like a lot of nickels there.

It’s a lot of nickels.

How many people does it take to manage all these sites?

We currently have one producer assigned for 15 sites. Usually they’re adjacent sites because often times what affects a neighborhood overlaps with another one. We’re still experimenting with that. Is it going to be 15? Is it going to be 50? I don’t know, but right now we’re playing it safe.

And those are producer-level employees with salaries of $30,000 or $40,000?

Yes. That’s our choice. Not everybody has to do that. Some of the other companies who have bought into the DataSphere product have chosen not to do that.

We did not have to hire anyone to do this. I will say, though, we did repurpose some bodies. Now as we continue to develop, I’m looking at what we can do to make it better. If we did hire somebody, what would we do? What kind of skill sets would make us more profitable? What kind of skill sets would add to and improve these sites? We’re exploring those things, but we haven’t hired anyone yet.

Who are the advertisers and what’s their typical spend?

Anywhere from $25 to $300 per month depending on what they decide to do.

And who are these people? Are they restaurants, small businesses?

Absolutely. Dry cleaners, boutiques, nail salons, tax businesses, interior design businesses. I can go on and on.

So essentially the guys that might have taken a display ad in the yellow pages.

Yes. In fact, many of tele-sales employees are from the old yellow pages.

Now, to do this, to get into the hyperlocal business, do I first have to have a TV station with a station-branded website?

Our stations have a strong, incredible brands and it certainly has helped tremendously in closing advertising arrangements because we’re recognized and people want to do business with us and they trust us.

It is one of the most key reasons for success. I really believe that. All the other little guys are going to just struggle. They will have some success. But I just think that once you bring a brand into it like as we’ve done with KATU2 in Portland, KVAL in Eugene and KOMO here in Seattle, it’s very hard to beat.

We have served these communities for years and years and years, decades, and we care about them. We care about these communities, we know cross streets, we know people. I mean this is just what we do. You know, I get pretty darn passionate about service to the community and this is a pretty cool way to do it.

What are you learning about the kinds of content that work on hyperlocal sites?

It’s much less sensational than you might assume. There will be a story about the fourth bank going into a very small neighborhood and all everybody’s talking about is that should be a restaurant because they don’t have a restaurant in that neighborhood. In my own neighborhood, often times the top story is the length of the ferry line, which matters. That is certainly nothing that makes it to the top of our main site.

Now, on the other hand, when something tragic, big, significant does happen, it is an amazing thing to watch. When the officers were shot and killed at a coffee shop in Lakewood in January, that site took off. We had 200,000 hits in two days. I mean it just took off. We had so much contribution and so much input to that site from people who live in Lakewood.

So, it’s very different. It’s the routine stuff, the everyday thing that matters to you in your neighborhood, all the way up to the big stuff. When something does happen it gives people an outlet.     

Is most of the content on any given neighborhood site from the users themselves?

It’s a combination. I really like the user-generated material if it’s legitimate, good content. The rants and raves are always fun to read. We get a lot of user-generated comments when it comes to public events like how much fun it was to go to the antique car show or how much fun it was to see the big ships sail into port. We get a lot of user-generated photos that way as well.

Now I understand that you are making an investment into DataSphere?

We did announce a $1.5 million investment in their Series B fundraising.

How big a stake does that buy you?

Well what was disclosed was that their Series B was $10.8 million. We have not disclosed what portion of the company we have, but it’s pretty small. The purpose is really to put some money where our mouth is and have some say in the direction of the company. Also, because I’m spending time developing this, to be fair to the shareholders, we needed to have a stake in this.

Now you want to take this to other broadcasters.

Yes. It has already been picked up by a few: The Las Vegas Landmark station [KLAS] announced already. Cowles [California Media Co.] has announced already. Morgan Murphy in Madison [Wis.] and Spokane [Wash.]. There are more in the queue.

The entire Cowles group?

Where they don’t compete with us.

So you’ve got market exclusivity built into the deal?

Oh, yeah. It only makes sense to do one of these per market for a lot of reasons. It would be too confusing otherwise. It only makes sense to do it in an exclusive way.

You have more than 100 sites in four markets. Are we going to see more sites within those markets?

Oh, absolutely. We haven’t even begun to touch all the neighborhoods that we can. We’ve just done what we could get to. It’s going to continue to grow.

At the end of the day how many hyperlocal sites will you have in your eight markets? Are you going to have 500 or 1,000 across your eight markets?

I couldn’t even project that. We will have far more than we do today because it really doesn’t cost any more for us to support them. It’s just a matter of making sure we can have fresh content on them. We have to look at each neighborhood and try to determine if it’s going to be a vibrant site.

For NetNewsCheck.com’s complete coverage of last week’s Local Online Advertising Conference, where Fisher’s Colleen Brown was honored for the company’s hyperlocal online strategy, click here.


Comments (15)

Leave a Reply

Sena Mourad says:

February 16, 2010 at 9:58 am

Colleen Brown is right on target with where all TV stations should be. Fisher has figured out how to have a product for the small local advertiser on the corner. While the small local advertiser doesn’t mean much of and by himself/herself, when you compund their expenditure with several hundred like them, and then put a multiple to it, you have greatly enhanced the value of your operation.

chip green says:

February 16, 2010 at 10:39 am

TV Stations are simply rearranging the deck chairs on thier own personal Titanic. Just like TV audiences, Internet audiences are getting more fragmented on a daily basis. TV station web revenue has been a disaster. Mostly it is reallocating money from Broadcast to the Internet to show an inflated revenue line. TV stations still mostly use banner ads and already antiquated Internet devices as their platform to advertisers. It is desperatiion and panic time in the TV Industry. Smaller audiences everyday, more accurate measurement, time shifted viewing, bad programming, more competition for the ad dollar and viewers are just a few reaons it will not recover. It is a mature business in decline, palin and simple. $25 Internet orders from a dry cleaner will not enhance the value or profitablilty of a large publicly traded media company.

    Janet Frankston Lorin says:

    February 16, 2010 at 10:53 am

    Sounds like someone has TV envy. I’ll take my TV margin, growth and dominance over99.9% of others any day.

Patricia Logan-Olson says:

February 16, 2010 at 10:56 am

Interesting nothing referenced any success for the local advertisers. As mentioned above, the drill-down required for even a “noting” by a consumer is very deep and probably doesn’t accomplish more than tactical goals. It doesn’t take much for the local dry cleaner recoup a $25 investment, but it sure won’t build the business exponentially. Broadcasters will always be in search of that additional revenue stream and bless them for trying to save the business but the internet is not the answer. In too many cases it is just robbing from Peter to pay Paul. While this plan doesn’t do that it is focused in Ms. Brown’s own words on nickles. I hope I am proved wrong, but don’t count on it.

    Kathryn Miller says:

    February 16, 2010 at 1:14 pm

    exponential growth on a $25 “investment”? sounds internally inconsistent

chip green says:

February 16, 2010 at 11:16 am

What growth Bonefish? That is laughable. Almost every TV station In America has seen their revenues erode dramatically in the past 3 years. Media budgets are shifting their weight away from TV. Smaller advertisers can no longer donate to the cause. Your huge margins are losing ground and in the medium to smaller markets, it is a catastrophe.. How about stock values? Fisher was over $45 less than 3 years ago, now it is under $14. For so many years TV used inflation and the strength of simple supply and demand for their cartel as the catalyst for growth. Now LPM’s are telling the real story. There is no longer a cartel and while TV was asleep at the wheel many others were taking a bite of their lunch. The party is long over. Businesses that go to their customers every year and ask for more money for less product usually don’t have a bright future. Niche marketing and it’s rapid growth will be the next huge threat to TV.

    Janet Frankston Lorin says:

    February 16, 2010 at 2:12 pm

    Sorry pal, but you’ve been drinking the cool-aid. Television revenues have not dropped any more than other businesses in this economy and are now rebounding nicely. Stock prices suffer largely because many companies overpaid for properties, but they doesn’t mean that the properties themselves are not producing nice returns. I’m sorry that you take such joy in the death of a great industry, but you ran to the obituary section too soon!

chip green says:

February 16, 2010 at 5:48 pm

I never ran an obituary or take any joy in anything. I just state facts. The business will always exist. It is simply overly mature and in rapid decline. The industry is constricting. Newspeople are being let go, there are shared service agreements and other forms of consolidation occuring all of the time. That will never reverse itself. Companies are overleveraged, audiences are shrinking and advertisers have new and more innovative choices everyday. Find me one market in America where the aggregate Broadcast TV ratings are higher now than they were two years ago. It does not exist. Face it, it is not a growth industry. The reason the stock prices are declining in the Industry is not what you stated but the fact that there is no growth. That is what drives stock prices. Just being profitable does not cut it for a public company. What does that tell you about the collective wisdom of the people running these media companies when they overpay for properties and had no idea what the future looked like? Do you think they are equipped to now face the intense challenges on the horizon? You obviously have a vested interest in the Industry doing well but pure emotion often times conflicts with critical, unbiased reasoning. Selling $25 Internet ads in a 140 billion dollar US Advertising Market does not even scratch the surface of the problem.

    Janet Frankston Lorin says:

    February 16, 2010 at 6:10 pm

    See, that’s the problem with the internet and why it will never be a believable medium. Any yahoo (ironic, isn’t it!) can print anything without regards to facts and not have to answer to anyone for it. Yes, I can show you not just one market where the aggregate broadcast TV ratings are higher today than 2 years ago, but I can show you many. I’m retired now and because of the broadcast industry, I can afford to sit around and agrue with “niche” marketers who seem to have plenty of time on their hands, for some reason. The only statement that you make that is credible is in the first sentence: “I…take no joy in anything.”

chip green says:

February 16, 2010 at 5:54 pm

Correction, I take lots of joy in many things, just no joy in seeing something fail.

chip green says:

February 16, 2010 at 6:21 pm

Do you always resort to name calling and trying to insult people? Are you incapable of reasoning with people that you simply disagree with? That is not exactly a sign of an intelligent person from my experience. You sound bitter, I hope you aren’t. What market has higher broadcast ratings than 2 years before? I cannot wait to hear your answer.

Brad Tucker says:

February 16, 2010 at 11:52 pm

Bonefish, not only you are “Old Guard”, you are what we call “CyberRoadKill”. On today’s multiplatform media and tomorrow’s narrowcasting world, you would not have a chance.

Leavett Biles says:

February 17, 2010 at 10:56 am

What an interesting interchange. While television audiences are fragmenting it is refrreshing to see broadcasters taking steps to directly connect advertisers to users. We have a long way to go including focusing on the customer’s success and developing ads that serve the users. Shifting Yellow Page $’s to a listing type ad online is not going to augment the user or advertiser experience but they are on the right track. I’d be interested in interviewing some of their advertisers and visitors and working with them to enhance their experience on these hyper-local sites. Cheers to Colleen for her efforts.

Tara Henson says:

February 17, 2010 at 4:16 pm

I’m glad to see that Fisher is at least going down that road. TV has the impact to move viewers to the web; and web video is the fastest category out there now. We just reviewed a new local sales program from Getty Adverting out of San Diego. Getty’s hyper-local sales initiative drives viewers to a local video portal that allows the drycleaner, salons and small business access to not just the station sites, but on air exposure. Keep up the good work Colleen!

chip green says:

February 17, 2010 at 5:58 pm

Exellent strategy, drive people from your TV station to the Internet so they can find a phone number for a dry cleaner. Trading dollars for pennies. No wonder why the business is in such trouble, it is because there are so many small minded, slow witted thinkers involved. “Leave our TV station right now, run to your computer and watch a small monitor so we can slap a 15 second pre-roll of Larry’s Diner in front of you”. TV sations have run from the challenges of their core business. Too much focus on the small stuff. Google, Yahoo, AOL, Microsoft have not even scratched the surface of what they will do with their Internet Advertising revenue capabilities. Google and Craigslist were created in garages while major media conglomerates sat on their hands. Wait until Hulu and other Web TV sites start inserting local and regional ads. TV stations have really never embraced the fact that they are in the Advertising business. It has always been reactionary by nature with little or no vision at all. They used to be able to sit back and count the money. Those good old days are long gone and will never return. Creativity is not hiring a sub contracted sales force to sell $25 ads on secondary TV websites. I am still waiting for Bonefish to supply me with the names of the Markets where Broadcast ratings have grown in the past 2 years.