FCC Votes To Spike Its Sports Blackout Rule

The commission, in a  unanimous vote, agrees to drop the 40-year-old requirement that TV stations black out games when a team fails to fill the local stadium. Key communications attorneys say that the vote could be seen as yet another step in an agency effort to undermine broadcast programming exclusivity — a linchpin of the broadcast industry’s retransmission consent rights.

In a swipe at broadcasters, the FCC voted 5-0 today to eliminate the sports blackout rule — a regulation that has barred cable and satellite TV operations from airing sports events that have been blacked out on a local TV station.

The vote puts the kibosh on agency protection of the NFL’s blackout policy, which has long required TV stations to black out games when a team fails to fill the local stadium.

During a meeting today, the FCC played the vote as a pro-fan, pro-good-government initiative.

“It’s a simple fact: The federal government should not be party to sports teams keeping their fans from viewing the games, period,” said FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler.

But key communications attorneys said that the vote could be seen as yet another step in an agency effort to undermine broadcast programming exclusivity — a linchpin of the broadcast industry’s retransmission consent rights.

In an earlier swat at broadcasting’s retrans negotiating leverage, the FCC voted in March to bar two or more separately owned Top 4 broadcasters in the same market from negotiating retransmission consent deals together.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

The FCC has also sought comment on whether to eliminate two agency rules that make it easier for broadcasters to protect the exclusivity of their syndicated and network programming.

Like the sports blackout rule, the syndicated exclusivity and network nonduplication rules effectively bar pay TV operators from importing broadcasting signals into a market with the same programming as local stations.

Without the rules, broadcasters would still be able to protect the exclusivity of their programming, but would have to rely on the courts, instead of the FCC to enforce the protections, adding to the hassle and expense for broadcasters.

“It’s just one more nick in the [broadcasting industry’s] armor,” said one communications attorney, of the FCC’s vote to ax the sports blackout rule.

“It’s increasing the leverage that cable has in retransmission consent to try to bring in out-of-market signals,” added another communications attorney, who asked not to be identified.

The National Cable & Telecommunications Association said in a statement: “We commend the commission’s unanimous decision to eliminate the antiquated sports blackout rule. As the video marketplace continues to evolve and offers consumers more competition and a growing variety of new services, we encourage the FCC to continue its examination of outdated rules that no longer make sense.”

In its order, the FCC said the agency’s blackout rule, which was originally adopted almost 40 years ago, is no longer justified.

When the reg originally went into place, ticket sales were the primary source of revenue for the NFL, and most NFL games failed to sell out, the FCC said. Today, TV revenues have replaced ticket sales as the NFL’s main revenue source, generating about $6 billion a year for the league, the FCC said. The FCC also said that blackouts have become increasingly rare, with only two NFL games blacked out during the last season.

The FCC order also said that the agency’s action was “unlikely” to spur the NFL to move its games from broadcast to pay TV.

“I hope the NFL will seize on this opportunity to repudiate blackouts,” said Wheeler, a Democrat, during the FCC’s meeting.

Added FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai, a Republican: For my part, I hope that the NFL will not respond to today’s vote by digging in its heels. Instead, it should view this decision as an opportunity to revisit the blackout policy … and to adopt a more fan-friendly approach.”


Comments (29)

Leave a Reply

Angie McClimon says:

September 30, 2014 at 2:20 pm

I think this is hardly going to change anything, except the teams won’t have to pay to keep their low-attended games on TV. The fear these attorneys have over the broadcasters exclusivity being undermined is overstated. CBS and NFL Network already simulcast Thursday Night football games. Some stations simulcast ESPN’s MNF when a local team is playing. It’s already a moot point.

    Keith ONeal says:

    September 30, 2014 at 6:41 pm

    Let’s use as an fictional example Tampa Bay @ Jacksonville on Monday Night Football on ESPN. Orlando is he secondary market for both teams. In current practice, a Jacksonville station and a Tampa/St. Petersburg station would broadcast the game. It would not be available for broadcast in either the Orlando and Gainesville markets. With this change, maybe the stations in secondary markets will be able to broadcast these games as well.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    October 1, 2014 at 9:38 am

    Incorrect. ESPN paid for the rights, so you can watch it there.

Brian Bussey says:

September 30, 2014 at 3:42 pm

and how does this help viewers.? Let me remind you that these same “viewers” are the tax payers who underwrote or backstopped the NFL stadium financing. Imagine Arlington Texas were the Dallas Cowbys play in a 1.2 billion dollar stadium financed by taxes on residents of arlington, tex yet they get no name on the jersey? . Stadium parking is $100. per car. So Arlington residents get robbed at the stadium when they are not getting robbed by the stadium ?? What a deal !!

Don Thompson says:

September 30, 2014 at 4:53 pm

Tom Brady might be having a tough year at the helm in New England, but QB Tom Wheeler at the Federal Communications Commission is turning in an all-star performance in Washington, D.C. ========== Please follow me on Twitter @TedatACA

Don Thompson says:

September 30, 2014 at 4:53 pm

On first down, FCC Chairman Wheeler banned retransmission consent collusion by separately owned local TV stations in the same local market =============== Please follow me on Twitter @TedatACA

Don Thompson says:

September 30, 2014 at 4:54 pm

On second down, FCC Chairman Wheeler put a halt to TV stations that were gaming Joint Service Agreements to evade the FCC’s TV station duopoly rule. ================= Please follow me on Twitter @TedatACA

Don Thompson says:

September 30, 2014 at 4:54 pm

On third down, FCC Chairman Wheeler eliminated the NFL’s local TV blackout rule in a move designed to allow local fans to watch the home team on free TV even if the stadium isn’t sold out ================= Please follow me on Twitter @TedatACA

    John Murray says:

    September 30, 2014 at 5:40 pm

    Uh, Ted…. Wheeler didn’t eliminate the NFL’s blackout rule. He has zero power to do that. He eliminated the FCC’s blackout rule which protected broadcasters from getting hosed by any of your clients who might want to transmit a distant signal of a game blacked out to TV stations by the NFL. Seems to me the ball’s now in Mr. Goodell’s court: If he and the team owners keep the NFL blackout rule in place — and jeopardize broadcasters in the process — then the heat the broadcast industry should bring down on him should dwarf what he’s been getting for the Ray Rice incident….

Don Thompson says:

September 30, 2014 at 4:55 pm

On fourth down, I’m hoping FCC Chairman Wheeler will update the program access rules in a manner that allows buying group like the National Cable Television Cooperative (NCTC) to make effective use of the rules on behalf of hundreds of independent cable operators that are now basically sitting on the sidelines ============= Please follow me on Twitter @TedatACA

    John Murray says:

    September 30, 2014 at 5:43 pm

    Ted, there’s no fourth down for you. You’re a three-and-out kind of guy…. : )

    kristin serman says:

    September 30, 2014 at 9:21 pm

    Actually I think the FCC got first down each time they have hit the broadcasters with their rulings and are likely to nail them even more in the long run which is way overdue in my opinion.
    The consumer has been losing for years with these outdated rules and laws and it is time to put the people first. Which the Broadcasters, The Providers, and The FCC has refused to do now for decades.

Patrick Schooley says:

September 30, 2014 at 4:56 pm

I wish there was an option to auto-hide some comments on here.

    kristin serman says:

    September 30, 2014 at 9:24 pm

    Why because to stop opposing views. The Problem is tv in this country has been one sided and the consumer has lost it is time to put us first for once we are the ones paying the bills , paying the fee hikes, getting channels we don’t want, bundled packages we don’t want, not getting out of market, distant market, and national network feeds of the broadcast networks. If the Broadcasters , Providers, and the Government/FCC put the people first maybe we wouldn’t have this bitter battle going on and instead moving further into the 21st Century with our communications system .

    Wagner Pereira says:

    October 1, 2014 at 9:43 am

    Only to hide comments from people that have proven themselves clueless. Go look in the mirror.

    kristin serman says:

    October 1, 2014 at 10:37 am

    You might want to take a look at yourself in the mirror last time I knew freedom of speech was legal.
    Just because you don’t like the viewpoints of others because we aren’t shills for the NAB, TVfreedom. org (anti-consumer group posing as pro consumer group), Broadcasters well that is too bad.
    Because I think you find the consumers don’t side with Broadcasters which we have seen with the fee increases. Also if your not clueless I just debunked your lies about taxpayers not funding stadiums they have been doing it for decades they just did it also with LEVI’s Stadium and will do it for L.A. NFL Team, or a relocated Oakland Raiders. But yet we see nothing for our taxpayers money going to making these Billionaires even richer. So you might want to come up with new talking points because bashing folks prove your like politician who loses an argument so you attack people or change the subject.

Don Thompson says:

September 30, 2014 at 4:59 pm

And on Super Bowl Sunday, we’re all going to be highly amused when TVNewsCheck reports that Sinclair TV is asking the FCC to impose Rockefeller-Thune Local Choice on Comcast-Time Warner Cable-Charter. ================== Please follow me on Twitter @TedatACA

    Wagner Pereira says:

    October 1, 2014 at 9:44 am

    Funny how cable does not want Local Choice when they own the content (See LA Sportsnet)================== Please follow me on Twitter @NotTedatACA

Ellen Samrock says:

September 30, 2014 at 5:18 pm

Broadcasters are grown ups who can take care of themselves. They don’t need the FCC to play referee and parent between themselves and the NFL.

    Don Thompson says:

    September 30, 2014 at 5:36 pm

    I guess you missed Harry Jessell’s column in support of the federally mandated 39% cap on the national audience reach of commonly owned TV stations, adjusted for the famously technology neutral UHF discount. ============ Please follow me on Twitter @TedatACA

    Keith ONeal says:

    September 30, 2014 at 6:47 pm

    Ted, your 4th Down play was INTERCEPTED and ran back for a TOUCHDOWN by the NAB!!! NAB wins, 7-0!

    Don Thompson says:

    September 30, 2014 at 8:46 pm

    The National Association of Broadcasters, which supported the rules, had no comment. http://bit.ly/1rEHVpU ============== Please follow me on Twitter @TedatACA

    kristin serman says:

    September 30, 2014 at 9:26 pm

    Haha that must be why they are losing every ruling except the bogus bill that is in Congress the STELA Bill but the supporters of the consumers will win in the long run as long as we have Mr. Wheeler or someone like him running the FCC.

Don Thompson says:

September 30, 2014 at 9:03 pm

In April, the CEO of the National Association of Broadcasters urged the FCC to craft “a national broadcast plan,” complaining there was too much talk about broadband. It’s wonderful to see that FCC leadership read the speech |||||||||||||||||||| Please follow me on Twitter @TedatACA

    Wagner Pereira says:

    October 1, 2014 at 9:50 am

    Perhaps Ted missed the ruling giving MVPD status to online “cable” programs, that have the potential to sell their programming direct to the consumer, bypassing ACA members and removing 50%-60% of their revenue. That’s a much bigger hit to ACA members than anything you listed above!