ivi TV To Oppose Comcast-NBCU Merger

In meetings this week with the FCC and Congress, the Web streamer will argue that the proposed deal will not support innovation and fairness in the marketplace.

ivi TV, the self-described “online cable system,” announced today that it intended to aggressively oppose the Comcast/NBC-Universal merger in its present form. ivi TV executives will meet with the FCC and a number of members of Congress this week.

ivi TV has already had communication the FCC about what it calls “Comcast’s anti-competitive behavior in the marketplace.” Working with its allies in the Congress, and with the Department of Justice and the FCC, ivi TV says it wants a broad and comprehensive scrutiny of Comcast’s existing contracts with cable and broadcast channels.

“Comcast would have regulators and the consuming public believe that their acquisition of NBC is not only benign, but is actually in the consumers best interest, when nothing could be further from the truth,” said Todd Weaver, ivi TV’s founder-CEO. “The facts are quite the contrary. Comcast has established a clear pattern and practice of requiring exclusive distribution rights in its contracts with content providers that stifles both competition and innovation.”

It is the view of ivi TV that many of Comcast’s current contracts unfairly impose a restraint of trade and limit competition. The acquisition by Comcast of NBC-Universal would exacerbate the ability of ivi TV and other OTT providers to obtain content, it says.  As a consequence,  consumers will  suffer and are “relegated to unnecessarily paying higher fees for Comcast’s defense of its antiquated one- size-fits-all legacy content delivery system.”

ivi claims that as the owner of NBC-Universal, Comcast would not only have a proprietary interest in more content, it will control the primary means of distribution of that content to the consuming public. “At a time when America’s economy needs innovation more than ever, this kind of unwarranted monopolistic behavior is most dangerous.”

“While NBC content once traveled to consumers over the public airwaves, today it also reaches consumers via Comcast’s legacy infrastructure,” Weaver continued. “Comcast is similar to the landline phone companies who have died a slow death. They will use contractual power and exclusive access to content as a means of continuing to generate revenue from an antiquated business model delivered over yesterday’s technology. The Congress, DOJ, and the FCC should require Comcast to provide a level, competitive playing field in exchange for approval of their merger with NBC-Universal. DOJ and the FCC must insist that Comcast’s content contracts be free of exclusivity and other contractual barriers to innovation, competition, and fair value for consumers,” Weaver concluded.

BRAND CONNECTIONS


Comments (4)

Leave a Reply

Matthew Castonguay says:

December 6, 2010 at 10:36 am

In other news, my cat will announce his opinion of Comcast/NBCU at a press conference to be held this afternoon. Seriously, who the heck cares what these guys have to say? They’re thieves as far as I’m concerned, but even if you don’t agree, what gives them standing to take the podium in this discussion? The fact that their subscribers went up 200% during Cablevision/Fox? (according to them). Going from subs you can count on fingers of one hand to counting on fingers of two hands can account for that. I really also resent seeing them pass themselves of as “innovators” for doing something that every company that’s been involved in streaming in any way for the last 20 years has considered but understood the concept of “rights” and therefore not done.

Judy Hoffman says:

December 6, 2010 at 12:34 pm

@rocker, great post and totally agree. ivi is less innovator and more press spin machine who is trying to obfuscate the fact that they are pirating content under their false interpretation of copyright law. I love ivi’s CEO who claims that they filed patents for the first downloadable conditional access system (CAS) in 2007. Nevermind that companies such as Verimatrix, Widevine (just acquired by GOOG), Irdeto, Latens and others developed this years prior. I’m sure for those who don’t know any better this makes for a good story, but that’s all it is – a story – and one that should end soon.

ken frierson says:

December 6, 2010 at 4:37 pm

Agree with the above comments for they are nothing but thieves.

Kim Eubank says:

December 8, 2010 at 11:11 am

Are you guys for real? You couldn’t be more wrong. Who do you think is responsible for this:
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/460784-Comcast_Agrees_To_Online_Access_Condition_For_Unaffiliated_Nets.php

or this?:
http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/good-news-for-fox-biz-and-bloomberg-congressmen-want-neighborhooding-applied-to-comcast-nbcu_b42863

Big Media AND Comcast are scared poohless over ivi and what it means to the industry. If you think they are thieves, than you must agree with the ridiculous cable fees you are paying. The cable companies are the thieves here. ivi has patented a way of encrypting their system so that it is 100% secure. That and the fact that they charge a small fee might just save their rears and you’ll be watching TV using their service in a year or two, just like everyone else. They are making serious waves. Where have you guys been? In bed with cable companies, no doubt.