Kaplan: Incentive Auction Doomed, Unless…

For the FCC's spectrum auction to succeed, NAB's Rick Kaplan says, the commission needs to make it “as easy as pie” by answering such basic questions for broadcasters that may wish to participate as: “Does the FCC want a volunteer in my market?; How much might I get paid?;  Where do I go to participate; and how exactly is it going to work? None of those questions have been answered, and the … clock ... is ticking,” he says.

NAB spectrum guru Rick Kaplan warned Monday that the way the FCC is heading on its incentive auction planning, the auction will “almost certainly fail.”

And by “fail,” he said, “I mean there is either not enough participation to enable a basic, nationwide commercial wireless band plan, or an outcome that results in widespread harmful interferences among services.”

Kaplan made his comments at a Media Institute luncheon in Washington.

For the auction to succeed, he said, the FCC needs to make it “as easy as pie” by answering such basic questions for broadcasters that may wish to participate as: “Does the FCC want a volunteer in my market?; How much might I get paid?;  Where do I go to participate; and how exactly is it going to work?

“None of those questions have been answered, and the … clock … is ticking,” he emphasized.

The FCC has said it wants to hold the auction next year. The incentive auction is actually two auctions intended to reallocate up to 120 MHz of spectrum from the TV band to wireless broadband. The “reverse” auction, in which the FCC will buy spectrum from volunteer broadcasters; and the forward auction, in which it will sell the recovered spectrum to wireless carriers.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

Broadcasters that have no interest in participating in the reverse auction worry that their services will be diminished by reorganization or repacking of the TV band that is incidental to the forward auction.

Even though NAB has been advocating a slow, methodical approach, Kaplan said, the association is eager to get past the auction as soon as possible.

“The last thing we want is this proceeding hanging over our heads any longer than it must,” he said. “Our aim is to see this auction done right and then we can get on with the business of serving our local communities in our traditional as well as new and innovative ways.”

Kaplan repeated four other steps that NAB has said are key to a successful auction.

  • Lay out a number of nationwide repacking scenarios. This involves looking at options for repacking, and focusing in particular on the moving pieces in the more congested markets.
  • From these scenarios, determine how many stations it needs to participate to achieve certain spectrum clearing targets, and where those stations must be. “Where do we really need volunteers?”
  • Estimate how much it would, under each scenario, raise nationwide in a forward auction.
  • Take its nationwide estimate and use those funds to ensure it entices volunteers in the markets where it really requires participants.

Comments (5)

Leave a Reply

Joanne McDonald says:

March 18, 2013 at 4:48 pm

I’m seen to know how to understand the entire spectrum situation. I would take a bet that Daystar, Trinity, Ion and all the other religious and minor broadcast network plus all the diginets multicast networks would round up being regulated to cable only network that would be made available to customers with FTA systems and be made available on all cable systems as well as on both Directv and Dish Network and also be allowed to stream their programming online for internet users at no cost. I like the idea in which NBC stations on 1080 share their channel with Telemundo on 480 in widescreen, CBS stations on 1080 sharing with CW on 1080 in widescreen, FOX stations on 720 sharing with MyNET on 720 in widescreen, Univision and Telefutura share a channel together on either 480, 720, or 1080 in widescreen, and ABC would continue to not have to worry about sharing their stations with another network or another station and still on 720 in widescreen, but could likely share it with other network affiliated channels on either 480, 720, or 1080 in widescreen. PBS stations would likely be forced to merged and share it’s stations on the same channel frequency and still be able to transmit in 1080 widescreen. The stronger PBS stations would end up sharing the channel space with the weaker PBS stations in markets where there are multiple PBS affiliates in the same market. The mid-sized and smaller TV markets could end up carrying 2 to 3 subchannel feeds in widescreen SDTV or HDTV on the same channel frequency. I would recommend that all the TV stations that are now on the UHF 14-51 band in digital that were on 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 in analog be forced to move on 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 in digital and all the TV stations that are now on the UHF 14-51 band in digital that were on 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30 in analog be forced to move back to those channels in digital plus all the TV stations that are now on the VHF 7-13 high band with different RF physical channel numbers on the VHF high band in digital that were on 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 in analog to be forced to move back to those channels in digital as the best way to not mess up on frequency assignments in the future maybe by around 2020. I like the idea of all the TV stations be allowed to transmit all HDTV and SDTV as well as mobile programming in the MPEG 4 format in the future maybe by around 2020. I like the idea of both IVI TV and FilmOn HDi be allowed to go in business again and be able to transmit all the local stations to the viewers on the net for free without any interference from the government for violating any copyright laws with benefits for online viewers that want to watch their favorite stations programming such as local news and shows even after the spectrum auction and plan becomes very mandated and very hard for TV stations to be able to stay on the air without being able to stream all their programming online to the viewers online. Me wanting IVI TV and FilmOn HDi transmitting the locals online for free to the viewers on the internet would be very beneficial when it comes to very severe weather outbreaks and breaking news that the viewers would want to be very informed the sooner and the better as a public service to all online users and all television stations in the future. I’m afraid that my take of what channels the TV stations ought to be on with the planning of an spectrum auction. Thank you for my understanding to this crisis in the TV business lately as it relates to the spectrum crunch going on right now. My comment to this matter is not a negative attack but a opinion and theory on my own terns to the spectrum auction in the future. To be honest, I disliked to have to post this comment over and over again to inform the public.

    mike tomasino says:

    March 18, 2013 at 5:05 pm

    Are you really still posting this? How many times is enough? And, your ideas are just as anti first amendment and unreadably silly as they were the first time you posted them!

    Tanya Pavluchuk says:

    March 18, 2013 at 5:23 pm

    “To be honest, I disliked to have to post this comment over and over again to inform the public.”………….Then stop already…………

Maria Black says:

March 18, 2013 at 5:24 pm

That whole thing just sounds like gibberish. You need some bullet points, better grammar, and less technical jargon if you are “informing the public”.

    John Murray says:

    March 18, 2013 at 5:33 pm

    I beg to differ! Thank you, Mr. Cieloha! Thank you, Sir! Thank you for your service to America! I salute you, sir! : )