JESSELL AT LARGE

NBC’s ‘Sound Of Music’ Sounded Good To Me

Whatever they thought of last night's live production, NBC affiliates should be pleased with the ratings -- 4.6/13 in adults 18-49 across the three hours, according to the overnights. Those numbers translated into NBC's biggest non-sports Thursday night in three years. The affiliates should be happy whenever the network takes a chance on big live events. Such programming has always been important to broadcasting and never more so than today.

As a boy, no movie made a greater impression on me than The Sound of Music, with the exception of Gone with the Wind and maybe also McHale’s Navy. (All three, it now occurs to me now, feature captains: von Trapp, Butler and Binghamton).

I was enthralled by the story of the von Trapps and the Alpine world in which they lived. And I soon learned to sing “Edelweiss,” the simple waltz that single-handedly saved Austria from complete ignominy for its role in WW II. (We weren’t all Nazis, it says.)

And how about those clever, singing nuns? As a Catholic school kid, I bought into their ability to foil the Nazis by pulling the distributor caps from their cars. Nuns, I knew, could do anything.

So, there was no way I was going to miss NBC’s Big Event last night. (I confess that I got there 45 minute late, which was good since I had recorded it and was able to zap commercials I wasn’t interested in.)

For the most part, the critics were not kind.

They skewered Carrie Underwood for her failure to generate much chemistry with Stephen Moyer, who played the captain, and to keep pace dramatically with the Broadway vets in other key roles. And they didn’t think much of Moyer.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

NBC made much of the fact that the broadcast was live. But as the AP’s Mark Kennedy pointed out, the production was “often strangely lifeless, with the crack and zing of being live rarely transmitting through the screen.”

The Washington Post critic Hank Stuever noticed a “weird sonic hiss” that was apparent when the music wasn’t playing. So did I.

I would add that it was probably a mistake to cleave so closely to the original stage production. Some of the songs that were cut in the movie should have been cut in the TV version. And the stagey pacing didn’t work on TV.

In the early going, the producers seemed to be challenging viewers to hit the remote.

The show opened in the oppressive abbey with lots of dark shadows. And Maria’s big opening number was muted by the setting — not a mountain top, but a claustrophobic forest on the side of a mountain. I suppose that was the best they could do in the Long Island sound stage that stood in for Austria.

On the other hand, as several critics pointed out, those who tuned in hoping for a car wreck on live TV were disappointed. No one stumbled down the staircase.

All in all, it was a remarkable multi-camera production. Some of the scene changes, like the penultimate one to the folk festival, were brilliant.

Underwood and Moyer may not be great actors, but whenever their performances lagged, one of those great Rodgers and Hammerstein tunes turned up and all was well. Underwood delivered on every song, especially her duet with Audra McDonald, the Mother Abbess. Moyer redeemed himself for any shortcomings during his big “Edelweiss” moment.

So, I’ll stand with the minority of critics and the 18.5 million viewers who liked it just fine.

Whatever they thought of the production, NBC affiliates should be pleased with the ratings — 4.6/13 in adults 18-49 across the three hours, according to the overnights. Those numbers translated into NBC’s biggest non-sports Thursday night in three years. The broadcast trounced everything but the half hour of The Big Bang Theory on CBS.

The affiliates should be pleased whenever the network takes a chance on big live events. Such programming has always been important to broadcasting and never more so than today.

NBC certainly realizes this.

“With so much [TV] now being watched on DVRs and through video-on-demand, the need for live telecasts is greater than ever,” NBC Entertainment President Jennifer Salke told Ad Age. “We must give a reason for viewers to feel like if they miss a live event, they will miss out on the conversation the next day.”

NBC was smart to carve out a Sunday night football game for itself. And The Voice is nothing other than a series of big live events. Its live primetime game show, Million Second Quiz, flopped this season, but it is expanding its real-time portfolio next year with The People Magazine Awards and a revival of the American Comedy Awards.

I don’t think that Underwood’s Sound of Music is strong enough to become a perennial holiday favorite, but I could be wrong. You never know what’s going to stick. It’s a Wonderful Life was a box office flop and A Christmas Story was a trifle when it was released in 1983.

In any case, the show looks like a financial winner. NBC spent a reported $9 million to produce it, and, from what we have heard, was charging advertisers on average at least $240,000 per 30 seconds. At that rate, the network should have at least covered the production cost, if not the heavy promotion.

So cheer up, affiliates. The holidays are upon us, and last night’s broadcast is hard evidence that the reverse comp dollars that you have been grudgingly handing over to the network are being well spent.

And aren’t you glad Rolf didn’t blow the whistle of the von Trapps — literally — as he did in the movie?

Harry A. Jessell is editor of TVNewsCheck. He can be contacted at 973-701-1067 or [email protected]. You can read earlier columns here.


Comments (15)

Leave a Reply

Christina Perez says:

December 6, 2013 at 4:14 pm

Still think NBC would be smart to keep the sets up, recall cast/crew, recruit Anne Hathaway and John Hamm to play Maria and the Baron Von Trapp, rehearse all next week, and go live again just before Xmas. Imagine the publicity that an instant reboot would generate! And THEN NBC would have its perennial in the can! And if that quick reverse play hurts Carrie Underwood’s feelings… well, that’s show biz.

    Monica Alba says:

    December 6, 2013 at 6:51 pm

    I like your idea. I certainly think the two lead actors were seriously mis-cast. I like Underwood and really was hoping she COULD act her way out of a wet paper bag. But unfortunately when I watched her scenes, I felt like I was watching a high school play (and not necessarily a good one either!)

Matthew Castonguay says:

December 6, 2013 at 4:15 pm

I wonder why they didn’t use virtual set technology for exteriors?

    David Siegler says:

    December 6, 2013 at 5:02 pm

    I think they wanted to keep the feel of a live stage production.

    Monica Alba says:

    December 6, 2013 at 6:50 pm

    Excellent idea on the virtual set technology!! A few places could have been greatly improved. Notably, Maria on the mountain top! That is an iconic scene and really sets the “feel” to the movie/show. It would have been easy enough.

David Siegler says:

December 6, 2013 at 5:02 pm

I guess I am a little bemused regarding all the hype and wonder about this being televised live. All around the world, day in and day out theater companies from Broadway to small towns perform theatrical productions live in front of audiences. Going live makes it exciting and adds chemistry to the performance and I think they did a great job. There may be better actors to play the roles but why would they do it. For most of the world when you mention “The Sound of Music” the immediate mental image is Julie Andrews on a mountain top singing the title track with her incredible voice and that is yardstick. I don’t think it matters who you put in the role, they aren’t going to measure up.

    Ellen Samrock says:

    December 7, 2013 at 3:39 pm

    When you consider that network television is all about the safe, the edited and the heavily scripted (no doubt, in part, because of the FCC’s indecency rules but also advertisers) this live presentation was a big deal. Unlike the old days, television generally leaves nothing to chance nor can it afford to.

Scott Schirmer says:

December 6, 2013 at 5:28 pm

Sure — but none of them are playing live in front of 20 million people.

    Monica Alba says:

    December 6, 2013 at 6:48 pm

    So very, very true!

Wayne Lorentz says:

December 6, 2013 at 6:29 pm

Hooray and Bravo to NBC for even trying this and not leaving it to a cable network. A credit to the network and a wonderful effort for broadcast television to live up to its mission of brining culture and art to the general TV public. So, OK, the acting could use some improvement, but this is the kind of production that made television the great medium that it is in the first place. Let’s hope for more such projects.

Monica Alba says:

December 6, 2013 at 6:45 pm

I thought it wasn’t well done. First, poor Carrie Underwood really showed her acting limitation. Felt like I was watching a mediocre high school musical. And the actor that played Capt. Von Trapp was poorly cast. The guy wasn’t old enough (or had enough make-up to present himself as older) to have seven kids, a dead wife, AND have a naval career that put him in the rank of a Captain. Plus Plummer played the Captain so incredibly well (ad did Julie Andrews as Maria) that it would be hard NOT to compare the acting. And for those who say that is an unfair comparison as it was more like the broadway play or the very early televised Mary Martin version… well, I’d ask how many of us saw that version versus the number of us who have seen the movie?? People will compare it to what they know. A couple of commenters had some great ideas. Like why didn’t they use virtual reality technology to at least create the mountain top scene (it’s an iconic piece of the movie!) And yesssss, I KNOW it was supposed to be “like the broadway play”, but the fact is that it WAS a TV performance. I’d compare it to a “less good” version of the old 1965 live TV “play” Cinderella. Now.. out of fairness, I give a lot of credit to the production people for taking on a massively challenging event. There were plenty of noticeable technical flaws (more easily noticed if you work in broadcast TV), like lighting miscues, and some cameras switched early or late. And even Underwood slightly slipped coming down the mountain (if you were watching, you noticed probably her right food slipped, she glanced down, and stumbled very slightly while singing). But really, considering the “size” of this production, you’d have to say it really was “nearly flawless”. My “review” is that “I felt like I was Von Trapped in a nightmare!” Sorry. But my suggestion is to NOT touch movies that were just soooo well done that people absolutely WILL compare the quality of the work. IF I had seen this on stage, I would have thought much differently of it. But it WAS on TV… the same medium that has shown the movie version countless times. Now I do have to say one last thing… I believe it had a huge audience JUST BECAUSE it was live and NOT because it was good. “The proof in the pudding” will be the eventual rebroadcast (next year, “same bat time, same bat channel”?) where I suspect the numbers (ratings) will be dismal. Unlike the 1965 Live TV “play” Cinderella, it won’t hold its charm.

Amneris Vargas says:

December 6, 2013 at 11:05 pm

Incredibly risky and most people, outside of this forum, don’t get the complexity and achievement that SoM really was. Underwood deserves an Emmy, Grammy and Tony, if for nothing else, courage. NBC & Walmart. Wow, nice partnership.

    Christina Perez says:

    December 7, 2013 at 6:21 pm

    I kind of agree-this production was to Broadway what Wal-Mart is to Macy’s…

Bill Greep says:

December 9, 2013 at 9:15 am

Couldn’t agree with Harry’s commentary more and kudos to NBC for something NEW ! They took a risk and nearly 19 million provided the reward.

Mary Collin says:

December 9, 2013 at 10:46 pm

Hooray, NBC…great effort, keep ’em coming