TVN WEATHER SPECIAL REPORT, PART 2

Nets’ Weather Coverage Criticized By Stations

Many local broadcast meteorologists say that the national reporting on severe weather is out of control, with sloppy reporting and almost incessant hyping of events. What this is doing, they add, is spreading misinformation that may be desensitizing viewers to actual weather risk.

With perilous twisters heading his way on Jan. 23, 2012, James Spann, the chief meteorologist at ABC affiliate WCFT Birmingham, Ala., was on air all night urging folks to take cover from the tornadoes that eventually touched down just before dawn.

The tornados — which killed two, one a 16-year-old girl — made national news. But ABC News’ World News Tonight stunned Spann with its report. “The first words out of Diane Sawyer’s mouth were that a tornado hit Alabama with no warning,” he says.  “I was flabbergasted.”

The next day, Spann, who has more than 200,000 Twitter followers, used the platform to challenge Sawyer to debate what really went down during those hours before the tornados hit. 

The network ultimately responded by calling Spann and interviewing him for the second-day story.

But that wasn’t enough to shut Spann down.

Three-and-a-half years later, Spann may still be the most vocal — but in no way the only — local TV meteorologist with beefs about the way the Big Three are covering weather. They charge the networks with sloppy reporting and hyping weather events (“unprecedented” is a favorite descriptor) or both.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

“No doubt national news media outlets are out of control when it comes to weather coverage, and their idiotic claims find their way to us on a daily basis,” adds Dan Satterfield, the chief meteorologist at WBOC, Draper Communications’ CBS affiliate in Salisbury, Md. “They tend to often get it wrong.”

Local broadcasters say the networks often go wrong when they fail to consult with them.

Spann, for instance, says national TV got the Houston floods story last May wrong by suggesting they were extraordinary, when, in fact, the city has a long history of such flooding.

“The networks just decided that this never happened before. That’s just idiotic,” he says, adding that the destructive flooding was a big enough story that it didn’t need hype.

“I don’t want to underplay the significance,” Spann says. “It was a big deal, but it was not unprecedented as they claim.”

Eric Fisher, the chief meteorologist for WBZ, the CBS O&Oin Boston — and a regular contributor to the CBS Evening News — has a similar gripe, which he says came through in the way national news covered Hurricane Sandy.

While indisputably powerful, the devastation caused by Sandy resulted from the storm hitting a heavily populated area rather than its sheer force. That fact was missed in many of the stories, he says.

“It was not a freak of nature,” Fisher says. “Not everything has to be the worst, or the biggest or unprecedented.”

Satterfield says news outlets were remiss in reporting New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s criticism of the National Weather Service for being “off” in forecasting the storm that dropped up to seven feet of lake effect snow on parts of the Buffalo last November. Cuomo blamed the faulty forecast for the state’s slow response.

“The reality is that it was one of the most amazing local snow events and the weather service hit it right on,” he says.

Networks also tend to follow a weather story formula that is tantamount to spreading misinformation, says Satterfield, who chairs the American Meteorological Society’s station scientists committee.

“In almost every report they end with saying ‘and more rain and more snow is on the way,’ and most of the time that’s just not true,” he says. “Every meteorologist in the country is rolling his eyes.”

All of which can be dangerous, they say.

“The headlines are desensitizing actual weather risk,” says Fisher.  With stories sensationalizing weather events — claiming that, say, tens of millions of people are in the line of storms, for instance — increasingly common, viewers “start to tune them out.”

“My fear is what is going to happen when we have a genuine historic storm,” he says. “According to the networks, almost everything is historic. And that’s just not true.”

The misleading or outright inaccurate reporting comes as the networks are turning to weather more than ever before. Often, weather stories will lead the evening newscasts.

“It’s hard not to notice,” says Greg Carbin, who, as the warning coordination meteorologist for the National Weather Service’s Storm Prediction Center in Norman, Okla., works with broadcasters, and serves as a resource to the news media.

Carbin says it “was amazing how many weather stories there were” in a national newscast he watched in one week in June, especially considering there was plenty of big news including the Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage and the capture of a New York prison escapee.

“They are looking for angles that keep people interested and make these stories exciting events even when they are far from high end,” he says. Many of the events covered — wildfires and floods, for instance — are not unusual, he says. “This is just weather we see in the summer.”

The locals, too, have noticed. “They found out what local news knows, and that is that is that people care about the weather,” Satterfield says. “That is pretty much the No. 1 thing that they watch.”

Adds Fisher: “Almost every day there is going to be something somewhere — a flood or a wildfire or a storm — that at very least is going to be visual. It’s an easy story.”

Spann concedes that he has often seen this weather hype at local stations, even his own. “But I have a rather easy walk to the newsroom, and at my shop news managers are very open to listening to my input, and have responded beautifully.

“Are we perfect? No. But, this summer, there has not been one occasion when one of our news anchors declared a routine hot summer day as a ‘heat emergency,’ and there have been no tips given on the air like ‘go into an air conditioned room.’”

The networks do have some built-in resources to help with weather reporting.

Spann and Satterfield say they are big fans of Good Morning America meteorologist Ginger Zee, who also serves as ABC News’ weather editor.  “She is a brilliant scientist,” says Spann, who worked with Zee when she was an intern at his station.

But “Ginger can only do so much,” Spann says. “She can’t control the news.”

CBS — the only one of the Big Three that doesn’t have a network weathercaster — relies very heavily on its O&O meteorologists like Fisher to do national reports, says David Friend, the CBS station group’s SVP of news.

And they all try to get it right, Friend says. There are “no barriers” between him and CBS News President David Rhodes.

WCBS New York’s Lonnie Quinn, WBBM Chicago’s Megan Glaros and KTVT Dallas-Ft. Worth’s Scott Padgett are among the local meteorologists who have done weather stories for CBS’s national newscasts.

In using station weathercasters, CBS News is capitalizing on local broadcasters’ edge in weather coverage, Friend says. “They can put it all into perspective for a national audience. That is key.”

But that’s not a substitute for a staff meteorologist, Spann says. “I can make suggestions to the news department and journalists, but the ultimate product is way out of my hands.”

Satterfield believes most national weather stories aren’t even vetted by meteorologists, let alone written by them.

“I get the feeling that sometimes producers don’t worry much about the facts of a weather story, but would be alarmed to find out that they got a name or other facts wrong in a story about a politician, etc.,” he says. “In other words, it’s an easy filler story.”

While he’s not privy to the behind-the-scenes processes of producing network news, Spann says he does know something is awry. “Almost every night they report on a ‘monster storm’ with ’80 million people in the path’ with ‘no warning’ that are ‘unprecedented.’ And they tell their views of ‘heat emergencies’ that don’t exist.

“Constant hyperbole over non-events dulls people’s senses. They won’t listen to us when there is really a dangerous storm that is a threat to life.”

It just goes against the grain of what TV news is supposed to be, Spann adds. “I thought part of journalism is getting it right.”

This is the second part of a three-part special report on weather. Part one was a Q&A with AccuWeather founder Joel Myers and part three on weather tech will appear on Thursday. You can read all the stories here.


Comments (12)

Leave a Reply

kendra campbell says:

August 5, 2015 at 8:20 am

This is just hilarious. Most local TV stations hype weather constantly. A summer thundershower is treated as a major event. Eight inches of snow in Cleveland is positioned like an imminent terrorist attack. Every day there is some manufactured problem a few days away. Look in the mirror guys!

Geordie Wilson says:

August 5, 2015 at 9:01 am

I spend way too much time fighting hype from national sources. Do you know my work? Can you give me one example of hyperbole from any product I produce? I look in the mirror every day.

    alicia farmer says:

    August 5, 2015 at 10:23 am

    You have a well deserved national reputation. Sadly the majority of local TV stations do indeed hype on a daily basis.

Jaclyn Hansen says:

August 5, 2015 at 9:32 am

I don’t know your work, James, but I applaud your stance on this. But JD Shaw (above) is right about local hyping of weather. Maybe not you, maybe not on your station but it’s widespread everywhere. Now stations has logo-plastered all wheel drive SUVs they drive onto snowy roads to report that…the roads are snowy. Pretty stupid stuff. Thanks for taking on Diane Sawyer, et al. I am sure after when the camera came back to her following the story package after the surprise storm she had that very very concerned look on her face. She is so good at that.

david chiari says:

August 5, 2015 at 10:04 am

Hi James,

Excellent article, Sir!!!! Also very true with the national media, and to some extent with some of the local media, depending on one’s market. I know your work. You do an excellent job, Sir. When you’re wrong, you admit it, on the air. We have a couple of TV Mets here in central Arkansas who are like you. If they get a forecast incorrect, they say so on the air. They do not hype the weather. Like you, they tell it like it is, and I, for one, applaud that in today’s media world, because it is so rare.

Angie McClimon says:

August 5, 2015 at 10:39 am

There are a number of local meteorologists who do comically overhype the weather in their market and that makes all of them look bad. The most my station promotes is our StormReady certification from the NWS, which our meteorologists actually worked hard for.

    kendra campbell says:

    August 5, 2015 at 11:35 am

    Interesting you use the word “overhype”. “Hype” is the new normal.

Frederik Fleck says:

August 5, 2015 at 11:19 am

The signature point James is making is spot on. When a Diane Sawyer or any other anchor at the network level uses inflammatory words such as “historic” or “unprecedented” or “without warning” without vetting the information even with local meteorologists, they do a huge disservice. I would have loved to have seen that debate, James……but, sadly, Diane would have probably dismissed it as insignificant.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    August 5, 2015 at 11:42 am

    That was the major issue with Diane Sawyer. She looked like your Grandmother with a face of astonishment on 2-3 stories/statements every night….as if she didn’t know – and perhaps she WAS the only one that did not know (or forgot what was told her earlier).

Julien Devereux says:

August 5, 2015 at 11:27 am

This doesn’t surprise me at all. Journalism has been replaced by sensationalism; most local news programs are covering less and less news and more and more TMZ type crap, so why would the weather be any different in the race for ratings (and higher spot costs)?

Matthew Castonguay says:

August 5, 2015 at 5:27 pm

Good Morning America seems to make “Killer Weather” the top story every day (when it’s not some story about Royals).

Meredith Amor says:

August 5, 2015 at 11:47 pm

Great reading. Journalism in America is all but dead. Sensationalism has replaced it. This is especially true for CNN/FOX and other national media. It has, unfortunately, spread to local media, as well. Recently we had a heat wave. Some stations hyped it to the point that there was some backlash. People complained. They treated it as if a tornado outbreak was underway. People aren’t stupid. It is summer. It is hot. Okay, this is normal weather. Heat index values above 100. Anyone with any common sense realizes they need to be careful in the heat. Those who choose not to listen…well what are you going to do? Force them indoors where there is a fan or air condition? The media hype of weather events has reached frenzy levels. Just watch any given winter storm event on The Weather Channel (and other media). There is a right way and a wrong way to present weather information. Scaring people is not the right way. I agree with James Spann on this topic. I hope he keeps pushing the issue.