SNL KAGAN PROJECTIONS

Retrans Revenue To Top $3.6B Through 2017

Despite fewer estimated multichannel subscribers, SNL Kagan projects that higher fees will boost station retransmission consent revenue totals by more than $2.5 billion over the next six years.

Although TV station owners’ share of retransmission dollars is under siege, SNL Kagan expects that total national retrans revenues will continue to rise thanks to the steady upward pressure on the monthly fees paid by multichannel operators to TV stations. That is despite an outlook for slower potential future growth of multichannel subs due to such things as over-the-top substitution.

SNL Kagan’s study projects that total industry retrans fees could increase from $1.14 billion in 2010 to $3.61 billion by 2017, with average per-sub fees for cable MSOs potentially more than doubling over time from their 2010 levels through 2017.

Retrans fees have continued to grow in importance for TV station owners, SNL Kagan says, with retrans revenues disclosed by public companies rising from $631 million in 2009 to $766 million in 2010. For the pure-play TV station owners SNL Kagan analyzed, the revenue stream was equal to 52% of their cash flow on average in 2010 and can equate to as much as 76% of cash flow.

Overall for the industry, there is no turning back from the push for higher retrans fees, SNL Kagan says, given the continued strong differential between the fees paid for certain cable networks versus what broadcast network O&O stations with significantly more viewers  receive.

For example, in 2011, SNL Kagan estimates that ESPN/ESPN HD will receive $4.76 per average sub per month, rates much higher than the fees received by network O&O stations in major markets which are thought to be less than $0.75/sub/month.

The disparity between viewership and retrans fees is going to keep up the pressure from broadcast networks and their owned-and-operated stations for higher fees, according to the forecast. O&O station execs very much see the growth of retrans fees as a work in progress and expect to get what they feel to be appropriate value for their stations over time.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

SNL Kagan’s analysis shows that retrans fees could rise 28% this year from $1.14 billion to $1.46 billion, thanks to more agreements being struck at progressively higher levels between distributors and carriers. Because of the number of subscribers, most of the fees are being paid by cable MSOs, which could pay more than $824 million in retrans fees this year, versus $484.2 million for DBS and $147.1 million for telco TV operators.

TV station operators continue to strike and renew deals with all multichannel operators, now with the added wrinkle that the retrans revenue earned is increasingly being shared at various levels with their broadcast network partners.


Comments (2)

Leave a Reply

Hope Yen and Charles Babington says:

May 25, 2011 at 9:06 pm

Its like being in the restaurant business in NY City!! The garbage man ‘charges’ you an additional fee because you restaurant is in HIS territory, even though you can choose any trash hauler. And then there is the seafood supplier of choice, as is the burglar alarm guy. Buy from THESE people, and you’re safe.

So you have a TV station. Better charge for that signal, and charge as much as you can get!! Because if you’re a network affiliate, you aren’t getting net comp any more. When you renew your network contract, you find that you OWE the network part of your retrans fee, PLUS a ‘fee’ for whatever – sports, promotion, who knows? So what
used to be relatively free of cash going either way for cable carriage, and anything from a ‘bonus (no comp) to a lucrative Nework Base Hourly Rate, has degenerated to a huge merry-go-round! In additional to worrying about a mountain of new, useless FCC regs regarding everything from public file issues to birds hitting your tower, you have to sweat where your station will be when the spin-the-bottle merryground of fees stops!

matt fess says:

May 26, 2011 at 10:37 am

Blows me away how much cable and sat ops are prepared to pay ESPN. 90% of women NEVER watch it, and likely less than 50% of men tune in once a week. ESPN cumes less than 16% of households a week. Pay them a buck or tell them to go away. The ops could recover a fortune. ESPN is just not that good.