EARNINGS CALL

Scripps Ready To Buy, But Not Desperate

Rich Boehne, chairman-CEO-president: "The industry is far less consolidated than the headlines would suggest. There'll be opportunities in the future. We have to be patient and focused. There's not necessarily a benefit to winning an auction. We'll pick our spots." Scripps would like to add stations in its existing markets but is open to broadening its market reach with the right deal, he added.

While the big guns battle it out in the M&A marketplace, Scripps bides its time, awaiting the right deals.

With only about $161 million in long-term debt, the company has capacity for acquisitions but it’s not about to get into a bidding war, said Rich Boehne, chairman-CEO-president.

“The [broadcast] industry is far less consolidated than the headlines would suggest,” Boehne said in response to a question from Gabelli & Co. analyst Barry Lucas about the company’s expansion plans during today’s conference call with analysts following release of the company’s second quarter financial report. “There’ll be opportunities in the future. We have to be patient and focused. There’s not necessarily a benefit to winning an auction. We’ll pick our spots.”

Scripps’ last buy came near the end of 2011 when it acquired the McGraw-Hill station group for $212 million, a 10.1X seller multiple and 9.5X buyer multiple. Recent deals, including Gannett’s $2.2 Belo acquisition, Tribune’s $2.73 Local TV/FoxCo buy, and Sinclair’s $985 million Allbritton deal, dwarf that deal, though the multiples are reasonably consistent.

But in a phase where the approach is go big or go home, analysts and investors are trying to parse where Scripps fits in.

“We have no plans to be a seller at this point,” Boehne said in response to another question. “We see very good opportunities in our markets and believe we can deliver value.”

BRAND CONNECTIONS

To that end, Scripps would like to add stations in its existing markets but is open to broadening its market reach with the right deal, Boehne said.

“We continue to be interested in our first priority of going deeper in markets where we already do business,” he said. “We would love to add some stations in those markets…. We’re interested in other affiliates in new markets. We have a target for the kind of returns we expect. In general, beauty and value are in the eyes of the beholder. Obviously, we haven’t been able to get any [additional stations] recently.”

Perceived value also lies in the eye of the investor and investors, apparently somewhat disaffected by Scripps’ financial performance for the quarter, were sellers, with shares trading down roughly 10% at midday. Most broadcast stocks were trading slightly down, as were overall indices.

Michael Kupinski of Noble Financial Capital Markets wondered whether possible FCC action on imposing a hard coverage cap at 39% U.S. coverage would boost Scripps’s opportunity to jump in the current M&A pool.

“It’s an interesting discussion relative to the industry but not something we have a big stake in,” said Brian Lawlor, head of Scripps’ broadcast operations, noting that the company has about 13% reach.

Instead, Boehne said: “We’re more focused on and would like to see some relaxation on in-market consolidation, especially in smaller and mid-sized markets.”


Comments (9)

Leave a Reply

Roger Lyons says:

August 5, 2013 at 1:44 pm

If Scripps buys any more stations, will they gut the syndicated programming inventories of each station, like they’re doing with their current stations? Sell, sell, SELL!

    Janet Frankston Lorin says:

    August 5, 2013 at 4:51 pm

    Let’s hope so! Syndication is of very little value any more outside of access. Even there, aside from Wheel & Jeopardy, all the others are interchangable.

    Roger Lyons says:

    August 5, 2013 at 6:13 pm

    And those are the two shows Scripps says are “underperforming,” and they’re replacing them with those losers “The List” and “Let’s Ask America.” Last year, they said it “LAA” performed well, they would sell it in syndication for fall 2013. Now it’s here, and it’s still stuck on only a handful of stations. Maybe they’re not so confident about the future of these programs after all. Content is still king, but Scripps doesn’t want to spend money for quality content.

Maria Black says:

August 5, 2013 at 3:04 pm

Think they’ve been outbid a few times?

Joanne McDonald says:

August 5, 2013 at 4:21 pm

Gannett can give WHAS and keeps ABC affiliation to Scripps in return Scripps gives up KNXV to Gannett and goes independent to form a duopoly with KPNZ under Gannett control since it’s likely KNXV has always been likely below a top 5 station in Phoenix. KPNX and KNXV would be a better attractive joint control than KPNX, KTVK, and KASW all under one roof under Gannett. KNXV has always been having difficulties as a UHF hertiage station.

Sean Smith says:

August 5, 2013 at 5:11 pm

No, Gannett can keep WHAS and ABC affiliation, and in turn Scripps keeps KNXV and does not go independent and does not form a duopoly with KPNZ under Gannett control, because it is not likely KNXV is not below a top 5 station in Phoenix. KPNX and KNXV would not be a better attractive joint control than PKNX, KTVK and KASW all under one roof under Gannett. KNXV has not had any difficulties as a UHG hertiage station.

    Roger Lyons says:

    August 5, 2013 at 5:18 pm

    As long as Boehne, Lawlor, and Sullivan are in charge of Scripps, their stations will always be also-rans. Get rid of popular stations in favor of unwatchable filler is one way to say, “we don’t want to be number one, we’re just content at being 3 or 4 and still profitable.”

    Roger Lyons says:

    August 5, 2013 at 5:19 pm

    I meant popular SHOWS, not stations!

JENNIFER FLOWERS says:

August 7, 2013 at 4:24 pm

Content is king but costs rule. Some syndication is so expensive that the markets where these programs air do not support the rates needed to make a profit. At the end of the day, I’ll take an increase in profit margins over higher revenue.