EXECUTIVE SESSION WITH SEAN MCLAUGHLIN

Scripps: TV News Needs To Break Bad Habits

Sean McLaughlin, VP of news at the E.W. Scripps Co., says the industry is failing to evolve on the content front with its addiction to fires and shootings. Resources need to be shifted to more investigative and enterprise reporting to stand out from the pack, he says, a pivot that requires “courage and strength” in local newsrooms. 

 

Sean McLaughlin does not mince words when it comes to where he sees local TV newsrooms failing.

The E.W. Scripps Co.’s VP of news decries the “clichéd, minor, petty, irrelevant stories” that he says have become a hallmark of local news, and instead exhorts stations to move their reporting resources into more meaningful investigative and enterprise pieces that don’t run in lock step with every other local station.

In an interview with TVNewsCheck Special Projects Editor Michael Depp, McLaughlin also laid out his concerns over persistent newsroom technology pain points and spoke to the increased pressures local news now faces amid “fake news” bellowing. He said OTT offers promise with its long engagement times, and that Scripps’ strategy there is beginning to pull into focus.

An edited transcript:

Where do you see your newsroom technology investments focusing next?

I continue to be obsessed with workflow issues. Probably the single biggest we have here related to local content is workflow. How can we get content as quickly as possible from the field to the hands of the consumer? Part of it is workflow, part technology, part different newsroom systems that don’t work with other systems. Hopefully sooner than later, the newsroom computer system, the CMS and the editing system are operating in unison off of one system versus a bunch of disjointed technologies.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

Those are a lot of pain points. Any hope for a resolution soon?

If there’s anything I’ve learned, it’s that it’s way harder than I thought it would be. Part of it is just comfort. There’s a cultural component. I’ll be honest: the whole thing has been way bigger than I thought it would be. There’s no product out there that’s ready to go that anybody has any degree of confidence in. Everybody’s looking at it as a priority, and everybody is looking at it as a combination of their own solutions and pushing vendors. Are there parts of their systems that are more important than others to us, and are their ways that we can get these systems all to work more effectively together? 

Where are Scripps’ newscasts now available on OTT?

Roku has been our biggest focus. It’s a big area of experimentation for us. We’re now getting to the point where it is time to really figure out what our play is going to be there. The consumer numbers are pretty solid, but, for local brands, I don’t know how many people really think of us in that space yet. We’ve got encouraging data leading us to believe it’s definitely a space worth spending more time on.

What are you learning about your OTT audience so far?

The biggest takeaway for me has been length of tune. It’s not a quick flip through, which leads me to believe if we actually came up with a strategy there designed specifically for those customers who choose to view us on the platform, it could be an interesting play.

President Trump has been launching repeated attacks on the “mainstream media” since the outset of his tenure. How, if at all, are your stations feeling that pressure?

There has never been so much pressure to make sure you get it right. Stations are almost being baited to do something wrong or make a mistake so it can be called out by one side or the other. That’s not a fun space to be in. We all take our role very seriously. We view journalism as one of the key elements for a functioning democracy.

It’s getting to a point where news stories surrounding the president are considered polarizing content and cause people to turn away. Do we not do those stories then? There are certainly conversations that take place in newsrooms now that five years ago, if you told me those would happen I never would have believed it.

Has that affected the way your stations report or present stories?

One of the things we’ve been tracking very carefully is do we have trust issues with our audience. We’ve been encouraged in that most of what we’ve seen is that [mistrust] tends to stretch to the national brands more than the local brands. We see that local properties still have a very high trust rating. That speaks to what we’ve built up over decades in our communities. That trust isn’t built up easily.

How autonomous are your newsrooms?

They’re autonomous. The news directors make decisions every day [as to] what stories they’re covering, what’s going on, what their daily strategy is. We have a corporate support structure. We have regional news directors who help with strategy. I know there are other companies that send out feeds of stories that must be covered or aired. We believe those decisions are best made locally.

What have you been working on to attract new, younger viewers to your platforms? Can you point to some specific station examples by way of illustration?

Denver [KMGH] has probably done the best job of a recent thing that has resonated really well. As we looked at that market and content opportunities there, there’s a strong desire to see more content where multiple perspectives are told on a story versus just one or two.

It’s identifying those issues within a community that are important and not just telling them the way that these stories always have been told. Who aren’t we talking to that we should be versus who’s the closest guy in a suit that we can get to downtown within five minutes? It’s where the industry had fallen over time and this is the kind of pivot that you’re going to see more of our stations making.

Our industry hasn’t done as good a job of evolving on the content front. If you go into any market anywhere and you flip on the news, it’s just a collection of shootings and city council meetings. What people want from us is expertise and knowledge that’s deep in their local communities. They want good investigative journalism. They want strong enterprise stories they can’t see in 15 other places. They want those people who truly understand what’s happening in their communities. The current economic conditions in our business prevent us from saying let’s just hire 20 people to do that.

That’s just not the reality of the business anymore. It requires us to recalibrate our staffing, look at things differently and [ask] what are the things that we used to do that we don’t need to do anymore?

Does that mean longer stories? Having beats that might not have existed before?

I’ve always been an advocate of beats. Having the topics in your community that are the most important and hiring people who have a skill set and expertise in that area are going to make your journalism better. Understanding the big issues that are going on in your community at a given time.

Having the courage to make decisions on a given day where we’re not going to go cover the fire and instead we’re going to use those resources to stay on track and go deep on a story that’s ultimately going to affect a lot more people, and our properties are going to be the only place where people are going to see this today.

How hard of a habit is that to break — to not cover the fire?

It’s a cultural nightmare. When A happens, we do B. Our whole industry operates that way. But we’ve got to be honest with ourselves. It means raising the bar of the things that are worthy of coverage for us. Be willing to accept the fact that when you line the five TVs up in your office, that you’re the one that’s not going to have the shooting and the fire, but you’re going to have a great investigation on a city councilman who has been abusing his expense reports. It’s a leadership thing first and foremost. You’re talking about changing the fabric of a newsroom, behaviors that have been built in over decades. That’s not easy.

Given that Scripps owns the podcasting platform Midroll, are you producing podcasts at the local stations?

The problem is scale. Podcasts make a lot of sense with a national audience. You go into a local market, and time is the enemy. There’s some dabbling, but as far as serious efforts I don’t know that local podcasting at this point in time is a place that makes a lot of sense.

What are your biggest priorities for the next year?

Developing an OTT concept that works for local brands. Part and parcel of that is continuing our push to change the way we look at local content. Our local journalism has to be top shelf. Our investigations have to be strong. Our enterprise efforts have to be at the center of what we do, and we have to develop courage and strength to put our foot down on these clichéd, minor, petty, irrelevant stories that have become the hallmarks of what local news covers.


Comments (11)

Leave a Reply

Joe Bottoms!! says:

June 13, 2018 at 7:33 am

He is right..The problem is the intellect of the people inside newsrooms to pull this off

RustbeltAlumnus2 says:

June 13, 2018 at 9:05 am

In a democracy, the only guys who never have to run for re-election are the media watchdogs, who are notoriously math-impaired on complex stories. It’s easier to follow the pack. The audience has wised to the "is your water safe?" scare stories.

mrfixit says:

June 13, 2018 at 9:37 am

wow, talk about driving viewers away, who needs to watch content over :30 seconds long. viewers don’t care about investigations like rustbelt says. viewers get their consumer info from social media memes whether they be accurate or not. local news missed the bus. Investigative to be sponsored content I’m sure, maybe with native ads for causes, companies and branding…. Somebody trying to come up with an excuse to get 2 more years of paychecks till somebody finds out what a bad idea that was.

newsoldie says:

June 13, 2018 at 9:44 am

McLaughlin is overlooking one key element in newsrooms.. the attention span of the audience. Over the years, we have trained viewers to accept news in 20-second VO’s, 35-second VOB’s and 1:15 packages so that we can cram as much into the newscast as possible. The kinds of investigative and enterprise pieces McLaughlin is suggesting, by nature, have to be much longer than that to be effective. The TV remote becomes a smoking rapid-fire AK-47 in the hands of the easily distracted. And let’s not forget the average number of, and length of commercial breaks these days. Where does he expect the extra time to come from for the kinds of stories he is advocating? Adding another hour or two of news is not the answer. Given the attention span most people have at 4 PM, 5 PM and 6 PM these days, McLaughlin’s suggestions are admirable but impractical and ultimately ineffective….. as a result, his suggestions don’t hold modern-day water. Who will sit down and watch an Emmy or Murrow award-winning investigative or enterprise story…. that’s less than a minute-15? He’s fighting a losing battle….. a battle the news media itself created and perfected over the years.

tvn-member-1409622 says:

June 13, 2018 at 10:44 am

Fires and crimes dominate partly out of habit. Changing the programming is necessary especially in multi platform distribution channels and can lead to a “virtuous cycle ” that in turn can help evolve the “main” linear newscasts. But the other reason stations like fires and crime is that those stories are easy and cheap to cover – finding and developing original content is harder and takes longer and therefore is more expensive. So resources have to be reallocated and since huge budget increases are not likely, stations also have to find alternative ways of doing some of the routine stuff that are more efficient and cost-effective. They exist but anything new or different even if relatively cheap, is an incremental expense until integrated and adopted to the point it can displace a legacy system or workflow. A long-range vision and strategy is required, and discipline on all fronts – people resist change and need leadership. I really think the key is a zero-based approach to budget planning, perhaps with a 2-3 year phase-in/out window. If not that, something like it. Those who haven’t embarked on such a mission already…not fiddling in the margin but actual disruptive evolution, are going to fall behind. This is pretty obvious by now.

TownCrier says:

June 13, 2018 at 10:48 am

It’s too late. Younger viewers have little interest in the canned pablum also known as local TV news. Weather and sports are on their cell phones, and fires, car wrecks, etc. get boring pretty quickly. True local TV enterprise reporting is pretty much a thing of the past…

Kathy Haley says:

June 13, 2018 at 1:53 pm

I think Sean is right that creating beats for reporter/producers is important – and setting a goal for each beat reporter to come up with an enterprise story once monthly. This will require digging, getting to know sources, etc. A few reporters will rise to the top. There is huge potential in covering stories about state legislatures, so many of which are legislating in the dark. And local newspapers have had to cut back on covering state legislatures. There are stories on the local impact of climate change, the local impact of recent federal tax cuts, local impact of changes to Obamacare. And augmented reality permits storytelling where there is no easy video. AR would probably have to be hubbed at station groups because it requires teams of people and time to master…but what an opportunity. Newspapers used to do five day special reports…What an opportunity for local TV.

OldSchool says:

June 13, 2018 at 3:50 pm

Assigning beats for reporters is what we did back in the 80’s and 90’s. Enterprising stories was also what was expected back in the 80’s and 90’s. Now it is more sound bites, on first with video, weather hype…. I am not sure people will take the time to view a news story that is longer than 48 seconds and most stations no longer have reporters that can truly handle a beat and develop news that matters. Social media has become a major source for news and local news is late to the game.

Megatron81 says:

June 13, 2018 at 11:48 pm

I don’t think you will ever change what local news is with the fire & crime and it seems that if a newscast try’s anything new it doesn’t do well in the ratings. I do like the feel good stories on local news like Fox17 does pay it forward hope that Standard Media will keep the pay it forward once they become the new owners of WXMI in the next couple of months.

tvn-member-5542860 says:

June 19, 2018 at 3:03 pm

I’ve been out of the newsroom for 3 years, by choice, largely because of the issues stated by McLaughlin. I’m an investigative, in-depth advocate versus ‘scanner’ news. Time for a fresh approach with talent that has life experience. That being said and in view of the variables touched upon by commenters here, current viewing habits, economics, and news ‘candy’ from the scanner, the brainstorming approach I’d be interested in taking to get this going is what we do in digital marketing. A/B testing. I’d give the viewer a choice if they want scanner news give it to them in one product and provide the in-depth reporting on another and see what traction you get. That may be too risky for some, so at the local level, do extensive research with focus groups in key demos, zip codes, and viewer ownership levels with one form of news versus the other. See what the research tells you. It may be that your primary viewers want scanner news in 20-second bites! Crime, public safety, and weather typically rate highest in content segments. As a News Manager, I’d give them some candy to set the story up, but then provide some meat on the story to add context, the emotional connection, and make it relevant and show the impact to the entire viewership and the community at large. (this is not new, but it covers both spectrums and does take resources, and I’m sure this approach can be improved upon) Look, it’s not simple, but there needs to be the will to try this come what may. It does take courage and money, but even great inventors took criticism before their idea took hold, ie, the light bulb, and the radio! You have to believe in it, deliver and stick with it even if it means starting on a secondary platform and then making the shift to your primary platform. Tell viewers what you’re doing…spell it out. They’ll tell you what they want…and give it to them. And then you get what you want. You know the saying, "You can’t see the forest for the tree." Local news needs visionaries, let the public viewers-your consumers-tell you what THEY want, and then have the will to truly serve their interest, not the same old same old of ‘this is what I’m going to feed you cause this what we can afford to do." C’mon man! Now…who has the $$$ to get this going?

اخبار المسلمين says:

July 29, 2018 at 9:17 am

Oh my goodness! Impressive article dude! Thank you so much, However I am experiencing troubles with
your RSS. I don’t know why I can’t join it. Is there
anyone else having identical RSS problems? Anyone who
knows the solution will you kindly respond? Thanks!!