Senators Seek To Have JSAs Grandfathered

Citing possible danger to local broadcasters and their viewers, five Democrats ask FCC’s Wheeler “to adopt a waiver policy that does not penalize JSAs that were structured and executed prior to the issuance of the new rules.” New waivers should be given, they urge, to JSAs "that promote more or better local news, public affairs and emergency information, diverse programming such as foreign language and expanded ownership opportunities for minorities and women in broadcasting.”

Five U.S. Senators today sent a letter to FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler voicing their concern over the commission’s recent crackdown on joint sales agreements between local TV broadcasters and urging the FCC to “to adopt a waiver policy that does not penalize JSAs that were structured and executed prior to the issuance of the new rules.”

In addition, they say, “the commission’ s waiver policy going forward should favorably regard, for example, JSAs that promote more or better local news, public affairs and emergency information, diverse programming such as foreign language and expanded ownership opportunities for minorities and women in broadcasting.”

The letter, from Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.), Benjamin Cardin (D-Md.), Robert Casey Jr. (D-Pa.) and Kristen Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), said: “Market pressures in the broadcasting industry are making it harder for smaller stations to survive. If regional stations go dark, our constituents will be the ultimate losers.

“We are concerned , therefore, that the Federal Communications Commission’s recently promulgated rules with respect to Joint Sales Agreements will further undermine the ability of local broadcasters to serve their communities. While we appreciate your desire to promote competition in the marketplace, the new rules are interrupting established business practice and creating substantial uncertainty in the broadcasting market. Ultimately, we fear the result will be less competition since certain broadcasters may be forced to cease operations, which would harm not only the broadcasters themselves but also the viewers they serve.

“Specifically, as a result of the FCC’s decision to count JSAs between television stations as ownership interests, many existing agreements wi ll have to be unwound unless specific waivers are granted. These existing agreements were consistent with the law and rules at the time they were executed, and business plans have been built around them. Forcing the broadcasters to rely on the speculative possibility of a waiver creates substantial business challenges.

“In addition to the business uncertainty the new rules create with respect to existing agreements, we are concerned that the new JSA rules going forward will unnecessarily foreclose many agreements that have resulted in improved local service and a more robust broadcast industry. This is especially true in smaller markets where stations may, absent a JSA, struggle to generate sufficient advertisi ng revenue to support the production of locally oriented programming.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

“Finally, we are disturbed by reports that new processing guidelines looking at JSAs and other sharing arrangements have caused applications for broadcast station transfers to be stalled at the FCC. These delays create further market uncertainty and challenges.

The senators concluded by adding that they “hope the commission will take swift action on pending television station transactions in the very near future.”


Comments (10)

Leave a Reply

Brian Bussey says:

June 12, 2014 at 3:39 pm

No JSA is worth the ink its printed on. all they did was lay off hard working Americans and shifter their income to corporate VP’s, few of which actually earn their keep.

    Michael Ford says:

    June 12, 2014 at 4:07 pm

    With your attitude and insight I’m betting your former company signed a JSA just to get rid of you.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    June 12, 2014 at 5:13 pm

    Considering the spelling mistakes HopeUMakeit makes in every post, there is no surprise they were laid off.

Mark Stolaroff says:

June 12, 2014 at 3:59 pm

While you lament the lay-offs, without JSA’s these same folks would most likely lose their jobs anyway when the weak stations go belly-up.

Maria Black says:

June 12, 2014 at 4:12 pm

How many of these senators have stock in Sinclair and Nexstar? Or even some of these folks are looking at this being a precursor to the ownership caps. ION would be a sad panda if that happened.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    June 12, 2014 at 5:29 pm

    Considering that the 5 Senators listed above are all Democrats (happen to miss that little tidbit?) and it is very easy to find their stock holdings with 3 minutes of an internet search, you should really try to answer your own questions before you post a leading question in which the answer is NONE. Do you do this little research before pitching a client?

    Ellen Samrock says:

    June 12, 2014 at 8:23 pm

    A lot of Congress folk like broadcast television because it is a ready source of low cost advertising come election time and JSAs would figure prominently in their campaign spending. They can natter on about losing local news and diversity should these JSAs be unwound but it really boils down to their re-election. The fact that both parties need what broadcast television provides and that Democrats are calling Tom Wheeler out tells me that he didn’t think his policy on JSAs through. Wheeler let his prejudice against television broadcasters cloud his judgement.

    Kristine Melser says:

    June 12, 2014 at 8:32 pm

    I wasn’t thinking the Senators had stock in the company, but I do wonder if the broadcasters contributed to their campaign and the Senator is supporting their initiatives. In the end, the stations get the money back in political spending anyway. That, and it’s amazing what lobbying can do.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    June 12, 2014 at 8:41 pm

    There you go again. Its very easy to check if Sinclair or Nexstar contributed to their campaigns. Have you done that? I don’t think so!

Jay Miller says:

June 12, 2014 at 4:46 pm

Here is all you need to know. Tom Wheeler is an ex cable executive (lobbyist) and has it out for broadcasters as do most cable executives (who most are ex pole climbers) ever since broadcasters starting getting retrans payments from them .If you look at the status of current cable sales, revenue is still climbing because they are achieving some ratings but unlike local broadcasters rarely do cable reps develop new revenue because most of their sellers are failed ex local reps or failed ex national reps where nowhere else to go!!!!
current