EARNINGS CALL

Sinclair Looks To Congress For Cap Relief

COO David Amy: “We have been and we are focused on the Hill  Congress and the Senate  and we were successful last year in getting JSA relief, and that’s where we’re spending a lot of our time, surgically going after relief. Specifically our next target is the [FCC national ownership] cap, and if there is change, we think it will be through Congress, it won’t be from the FCC,” Amy said.

Top executives at Sinclair Broadcast Group want relief from regulations that limit the number of stations the group may own, locally and nationally, but they have given up getting it from the FCC.

“We’re not optimistic about a change from the FCC,” said COO David B. Amy during Sinclair’s 2Q earnings teleconference with industry analysts earlier today.

“We have been … focused on … Congress,” he said. “We were successful last year in getting JSA relief, and that’s where we’re spending a lot of our time, surgically going after relief. Specifically, our next target is the [national ownership] cap.”

CEO David Smith weighed in, saying: “We’ve spent a lot of time with key members of the House and … the Senate, both parties, right at the top of the echelon, and I can say with some degree of comfort that each time we meet with them their typical response is we need to fix this, this is obviously a mistake, tell us what you want us to do and how can we help you.

“There is a broad sense that the broadcasting industry is grossly over-regulated, and the rules need to be thrown aside. So I think once the election’s over, regardless of who’s in office, we’re going to go back at it, and I think there’s a chance next year you may see something happen.”

Sinclair’s 2Q 20.5% gain in revenue to $606.3 million represented a beat of its prior guidance for the quarter, which was calling for a 19% gain to about $600 million.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

During 2Q, said Amy, Sinclair was able to come to agreement with Comcast/NBCU on both retransmission compensation and reverse compensation for a number of its NBC stations

As reported yesterday by TVNewsCheck, Sinclair renewed Fox affiliations in eight markets.

Crediting the company’s investment in local news, Amy said Sinclair brought in $17 million in political during the quarter, a 12% pro forma gain over 2Q 2012 political results. He said core was in line with guidance at plus 1% and added that digital enjoyed a 26% pro forma gain.

Political is not seen by the company as a major impediment to core advertising sales.

VP/co-COO Steven M. Marks explained that only about nine of its markets have a serious problem with core displacement during election season. “In most of these markets we enjoy more than one property, so as some advertisers get squeezed out of our primary channels because of political they can go to one of our secondary channels to keep their advertising in place.”

“From an inventory standpoint,” Marks added, “realistically it affects maybe 10% of our resume in totality.” He singled out Ohio and Florida as states which consistently experience the phenomenon.

Marks noted that 3Q pacing in the automotive category is the best so far this year. It’s a “plus in second quarter, a plus in third quarter. It’s been pretty stable and the numbers have been pretty consistent.

Added VP/co-COO Stephen J. Pruett, “The competition within the dealer groups to get local market share stays fairly intense … I think where we are is a very healthy sort of oscillation around a strong SAARs number overall.”

The company is not worried about losing auto to digital, and further is using its own digital assets to keep auto in the Sinclair fold. “We did see on a market by market basis some people who tested going without mass media come back to mass media,” Pruett said.

Pruett added, “We see mass media and digital marketing working hand in hand to create an integrated sale. We’ve evolved over time. We’ve educated our teams over time, and I would say that we’re materially changing the level of conversation that we have with auto dealers.”

Guidance for Q3 calls for a 33% gain in revenue to between $645 million-$663 million, with an $800 million infusion of income coming from the Olympics. Amy said that core is expected be up low single digits versus 3Q 2015, and will likely come in 3% better than 3Q 2012 on a pro forma basis.

Amy is expecting to beat the $255 million total in political earned in 2012, with results skewing more to 4Q than normal due to the late start in fund-raising by Donald Trump.

SVP/Corporate Finance/Treasurer Lucy A. Rutishauser is calling for retrans growth in the high teens for 2016, low teens for 2017 and single digits in 2018.

“The trend there is not related two anything other than just timing of when the MVPD contracts come up versus the affiliation agreements,” she said.

CFO Christopher S. Ripley said that Circa, Sinclair’s recently-launched news and entertainment website, was competitive with established digital brands right out of the gate, but is not expected to start making a profit for some time.

On the cable side, Sinclair has cut deals with Comcast and Charter that will boost subscriber totals for The Tennis Channel.

Amy said that while the company would be interested in further cable programming, he noted that there aren’t many opportunities out there that the company is aware of, nor is it specifically seeking such an opportunity.


Comments (11)

Leave a Reply

Angie McClimon says:

August 3, 2016 at 1:52 pm

They already have several hundred stations, a few networks, and Dielectric Antennas. Why do they need more?

    Gene Johnson says:

    August 3, 2016 at 4:10 pm

    Greed. More is always better (at least to some).

    Cameron Miller says:

    August 3, 2016 at 5:59 pm

    Businesses are not greedy now stop it!

Rey Chavez says:

August 3, 2016 at 4:42 pm

You must be kidding….. the quality of the industry is at all time lows due to the Sinclairs and Nexstars of the world sucking the life, and employees, out of the business. If anything, the cap should be lowered.

    Darrell Bengson says:

    August 4, 2016 at 9:14 am

    Sour grapes,
    Without the likes of Sinclair and Nexstar the industry would have gone belly up by now…

Kristjan Magnusson says:

August 3, 2016 at 5:34 pm

Instead, the UHF discount should be eliminated.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    August 3, 2016 at 8:09 pm

    Yes, UHF Discount should have been eliminated with Digital ATSC switch in 2009 as I have posted many times. However, Sinclair is still under cap without the UHF Discount. Only those who believe American Cable Ass Ted think otherwise.

Shenee Howard says:

August 3, 2016 at 5:56 pm

They are already abusing the system – they still get a UHF credit even though in the age of digital TV, high cable and sattelite penetration their UHF stations are on an even footing with VHF. That needs to be eliminated and if it is, they will be way over the FCC limit. So many stations under the control of a cheap broadcaster like Sinclair is not serving the public interest.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    August 3, 2016 at 8:06 pm

    As noted previously in response to an incorrect American Cable Ass Ted post, Sinclair markets only total 37.663% of the USA TVHH WITHOUT a UHF DISCOUNT, not the 75% AC Ass Ted claimed. As thus, they could expand now without a UHF discount. So you clearly do not know what you are talking about.

Dale Godfrey says:

August 3, 2016 at 9:20 pm

Unreal. Back in the late 1970’s and 1980’s our industry was singing the praises of how our industry had successfully lobbied the IRS to issue tax deferment certificates to station sellers who sold to minority controlled applicants. That was supposed to make it possible for minorities to become owners. And who can’t remember the ramping up of the enforcement of EEO rules to supposedly open more management opportunities to minorities? But now with the nearly unlimited number of licenses ONE entity can control comes the ridiculous effort by Sinclair to make even MORE licenses available to them. The result is fewer ownership opportunities, fewer management opportunities, fewer editorial viewpoints, and a generally degraded broadcast paradigm compared to what we had a few decades ago, all thanks to member of congress who need to be apprised of the other side of the issue than just that put forth by Sinclair.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    August 4, 2016 at 12:08 am

    Perhaps you should complain about the number of minorities buyers who took advantage of the rulings 40 years ago and then cashed out for a big profit instead of condemning the system.