UPDATED 1 P.M. ET

The New Sinclair: 72% Coverage + WGNA

Sinclair CEO Chris Ripley says the best way to think of the deal is that Sinclair is paying $6.5 billion when Tribune’s debt is factored in, but that there is between $2 billion and $2.5 billion in "non-core" assets that when subtracted brings down the price for the core assets (stations and WGN America) to between $4 billion and $4.5 billion or around 7 times EBITDA.

Reports late Sunday and early Monday that Sinclair Broadcast Group would win its bid to buy Tribune Media Co. proved correct.

The two companies this morning announced that they have entered into a definitive agreement under which Sinclair will acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Tribune for $43.50 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $3.9 billion, plus the assumption of approximately $2.7 billion in net debt.

The resulting group will cover 72% of the U.S. with stations in 39 of the top 50 markets.

Calling the deal “historic” and “transformative,” Sinclair CEO Chris Ripley told analysts in a a post-announcement call that the best way to think of the deal is that Sinclair is paying $6.5 billion when the debt is factored in, but that there is between $2 billion and $2.5 billion in “non-core” assets (like Tribune’s 32% interest in the Food Network and real estate) that when subtracted brings down the price for the core assets (the stations and WGN America) to between $4 billion and $4.5 billion or around seven times EBITDA.

Under the terms of the agreement, Tribune stockholders will receive $35.00 in cash and 0.23 shares of Sinclair Class A common stock for each share of Tribune Class A common stock and Class B common stock they own. The total $43.50 per share consideration represents a premium of approximately 26% over Tribune’s unaffected closing share price on Feb. 28, the day prior to media speculation regarding a possible transaction; approximately 14% over Tribune’s 30-day volume weighted average closing stock price; and approximately 8% over Tribune’s closing share price on May 5, the last trading day prior to today’s announcement.

Tribune owns or operates 42 television stations in 33 markets, cable network WGN America, digital multicast network Antenna TV, minority stakes in the TV Food Network and CareerBuilder, and a variety of real estate assets. Tribune’s stations consist of 14 Fox, 12 CW, 6 CBS, 3 ABC, 2 NBC, 3 MyNetworkTV affiliates and 2 independent stations. The group includes stations in the top three DMAs in the country, seven in the top 10 and 34 in the top 50 DMAs.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

“The Tribune stations are highly complementary to Sinclair’s existing footprint and will create a leading nationwide media platform that includes our country’s largest markets. The acquisition will enable Sinclair to build ATSC 3.0 (Next Generation Broadcast Platform) advanced services, scale emerging networks and national sales, and integrate content verticals. The acquisition will also create substantial synergistic value through operating efficiencies, revenue streams, programming strategies and digital platforms.”

Ripley said there are 14 markets where Tribune has stations that overlap with Sinclair’s and that he didn’t think any of them would run afoul of the FCC ownership limits or cause Justice Department objections.

Sinclair ownership of stations in those markets will have “no impact on overall competition,” he said. “We hope the regulators agree with us.”

However, he also said that three markets are “most likely” to trigger concern from the regulators: Wilkes-Barre/Scranton, Pa.; St. Louis; and Salt Lake City.

Ripley said that if it has to sell any stations, he believes that they will be “highly sought” by other broadcasters. He added that Sinclair is open to swapping stations so that it could expand into new markets as it comes into compliance with the regulators.

Ripley said that he believes Sinclair can turn WGN America is a big money maker for Sinclair by cutting back on the “high-cost” original programming and relying more on low-budget originals and “reruns.”

“We think that is the right path for WGNA,” he said. “WGNA does not have a revenue problem. It’s got lots of revenues. It’s got a nice contractual ramp of affiliates over the next couple of years and a nice base of advertising revenue.

“If you take a look at the ratings that WGNA generates, it doesn’t justify the type of spending they do or the original programming side. We believe quite firmly that that channel could be run much more profitably; just re-racking a fraction of what they spend on programming [could] return [it] to profitability.”

Ripley also acknowledged that the Tribune’s 14 Fox affiliates are scheduled to “step up to market level” reverse retrans to the network starting midway in 2018. “So, 2019 is when you feel the full-year impact of that.”

The deal dovetails with Sinclair plans to aggressively exploit ATSC 3.0, the new broadcast standard the FCC is expected to authorize by the end of the year. By bringing Sinclair “that much closer” to having a national footprint, Ripley said, the Tribune deal brings Sinclair closer to realizing the full power of the standard.

“It’s that sort of [national] network that opens up all the incremental revenue that are beyond core broadcasting. “

The national “advanced services” include  providing a “wireless MVPD” service and datacasting to connected car and autonomous cars, he said.

That’s not to say ATSC 3.0 will not benefit each station in its market, he added. “It reaches more devices, it allows targeted advertising, it allows subscription based models, its IP end to end, it allows for four or five [times] the capacity you have now to deliver more content, more channels.”

“This will be the largest acquisition in our company’s history, and I want to thank everyone from the Sinclair team, as well as our advisors and bankers who made this possible,” added David Smith, executive chairman of Sinclair. “Television broadcasting is even more relevant today, especially when it comes to serving our local communities. Tribune’s stations allow Sinclair to strengthen our commitment to serving local communities and to advance the next generation broadcast platform. This acquisition will be a turning point for Sinclair, allowing us to better serve our viewers and advertisers while creating value for our shareholders.”

“Today’s announcement is the culmination of an extensive strategic review, which has delivered significant value to our stockholders,” said Peter Kern, Tribune’s CEO. “Since we announced the strategic review 15 months ago, we have streamlined the business, monetized non-core assets, strengthened our balance sheet and returned more than $800 million to stockholders — all of which has resulted in a 50% increase in stockholder value. We are extremely proud to join Sinclair, and we’re excited that Tribune stockholders and employees will have the opportunity to participate in the long-term growth of the combined company.”

The transaction has been unanimously approved by the boards of directors of both companies and is anticipated to close and fund in the fourth quarter of 2017. Completion of the transaction is subject to approval by Tribune’s stockholders, as well as customary closing conditions, including approval by the FCC, and antitrust clearance.

Sinclair said it expects to fund the purchase price at closing through a combination of cash on hand, fully committed debt financing to be provided by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Royal Bank of Canada, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and by accessing the capital markets.

In order to comply with FCC ownership requirements and antitrust regulations, Sinclair may sell certain stations in markets where it currently owns stations. Such divestitures, it said, will be determined through the regulatory approval process.

Including the Tribune acquisition (before any related divestitures), all previously announced pending transactions, and pro forma for expected synergies, Sinclair’s 2015 and 2016 media revenues would have been $4.070 billion and $4.603 billion, respectively. The $6.6 billion enterprise value represents an average pro forma EBITDA multiple of less than 7.0x on the core television and entertainment business and is expected to add over 40% pro forma 2016/2017 free cash flow per share accretion.

Wells Fargo analyst Marci Ryvicker commented: “We like this deal for Sinclair — it is clearly accretive in terms of [free cash flow] FCF and was done at a very attractive multiple of less than 7x. Just applying Sinclair’s current tax-adjusted FCF multiple (8.2x) to a PF FCF/share number of $6.65 … gets us a “fair market value” price of approximately $55/share for SBGI’s stock.


Comments (27)

Leave a Reply

Cheryl Thorne says:

May 8, 2017 at 10:25 am

Thank god for the Tribune personnel it’s not Nexstar

Shenee Howard says:

May 8, 2017 at 11:01 am

I’m not sure things would be better, including Sinclair’s meddling into content

    Andrea Rader says:

    May 8, 2017 at 8:13 pm

    Apart from the must-runs, Sinclair doesn’t meddle in content, at least in my market.

Don Thompson says:

May 8, 2017 at 11:06 am

I checked this personally: After the deal closes, 99% of all Americans will live within walking distance of a Sinclair-owned or -operated TV station ………….. Please Follow Me On Twitter @TedatACA

Patrick Burns says:

May 8, 2017 at 11:10 am

This is bad news for the BIG 4 as Sinclair now has some serious kick ass clout for sure.

The re trans game is shifted for Sinclair.
Watching this unfold will be fun.

Would not be surprised if Sinclair moves their corporate HQS to NY City. It only makes sense.

    Matt Hortobagyi says:

    May 8, 2017 at 11:28 am

    Not sure I agree with you as to why Sinclair would want to move to NYC. They are a low Over Head operator who are also low profile owners. You don’t go to NYC if that has been your business plan.

    Khristian Lee says:

    May 8, 2017 at 12:06 pm

    The only thing I see they could do in NY, or other big cities for that matter, is set up an in-house rep firm. Now that they have properties in all the big markets they could cut CoxReps & Katz loose. Why pay them a percentage on all that billing when they could hire the best from each rep office and bring them in house?

    kendra campbell says:

    May 8, 2017 at 12:59 pm

    Bye-bye Cox and Katz. A year from now Sinclair will have its own rep.

    Matt Hortobagyi says:

    May 8, 2017 at 1:12 pm

    Not sure taking Rep in house has worked for Gray.

    Michelle Underwood says:

    May 8, 2017 at 1:59 pm

    Like Gray is even in the same hemisphere, size-wise? Seems to work for the O & O’s quite well.

    Khristian Lee says:

    May 8, 2017 at 1:59 pm

    Gray doesn’t have an in-house rep firm. They’ve been putting the work on the NSM’s. If Sinclair does what the O&O’s have done, it’s more likely to work that the model Gray went with.

Snead Hearn says:

May 8, 2017 at 12:18 pm

Divestitures should be interesting and give great opportunities for other companies to strengthen their portfolios. Sinclair and Nexstar seem to have a well thought out plan of attack. Wonder if Tegna, Hearst, Cox, Raycom, etc. are players in future M&A?

Cheryl Thorne says:

May 8, 2017 at 12:38 pm

Sinclair has just set up a network. They are smart . Unlike the other non OandO broadcasters they know the day is coming when the networks will abandon the affiliates and put all their content on their cable channels.

Angie McClimon says:

May 8, 2017 at 12:53 pm

Sinclair is the worst company to work for. Good luck to Tribune Media employees. Your days are numbered. Your newscasts will become standardized conservative-leaning bias, your station identity corporate-designed. Your independence is over.

    Michelle Underwood says:

    May 8, 2017 at 2:00 pm

    As opposed to the O & O’s and network’s left leaning bias???

    Sean Smith says:

    May 8, 2017 at 2:02 pm

    Cannot say if Sinclair is a bad company to work for. But I can take issue with a station’s “independence.” That vanished decades ago when the cable TV industry was deregulated, followed by the deregulation of the broadcast industry. When group owners began expanding, that’s when the independence vanished. The old “7-7-7” rule in the broadcast industry was doomed and ever since, the personal touch that stations gave their communities of license began disappearing.

    Brian Bussey says:

    May 9, 2017 at 3:37 pm

    I am still waiting for a example of “left leaning coverage” from the big 3 major networks.

Snead Hearn says:

May 8, 2017 at 2:27 pm

Independence has been over for 20+ years and newscasts have been somewhat dictated about the same amount of time. It is definitely a new world and conservative leaning or left leaning the news is prevalent in most corporate ownership and definitely in the O & O’s. I believe Sinclair has positioned their company in a perfect position for when the networks drop most of the affiliates for their own cable channel. Good luck to both Sinclair and Tribune.

Patrick Burns says:

May 8, 2017 at 2:46 pm

NY City is the center of the ad world just ahead of London & Paris.
It is a city where a slew of technical services start and end. Do you know what One Hudson is , you should. So for host of reasons web, fibre, air travel, entertainment & dining , talent pool… it does make sense .
Does a talented script writer or promo editor want to live in over priced DC or Baltimore instead of Gotham. Wake up it will happen.

    Keith ONeal says:

    May 8, 2017 at 2:51 pm

    I do not understand why NYC is referred to as Gotham; Batman does not live in NYC!

    Teri Keene says:

    May 8, 2017 at 9:08 pm

    Variety often used the term “Gotham” to describe NYC. Saw it all the time when I read the magazine.

Keith ONeal says:

May 8, 2017 at 2:49 pm

Looks to me that Sinclair wants to be a Broadcast Network. If so, they need to do better than FOX, they need to be more like ABC, CBS, and NBC and do 3 hours (4 on Sundays) of Prime Time, a National Newscast, Daytime programming, and/or a late night show ~ things that FOX, ION, The CW, and My Network TV DOES NOT do!

Patrizia Muehlbauer says:

May 8, 2017 at 3:59 pm

Smart deal for Sinclair in their future battle with FOX and new affiliate agreements.

Patrizia Muehlbauer says:

May 8, 2017 at 4:07 pm

Also, although I’m not sold on anyone doing an in-house repfirm as regional /national sales in general have been and will continue to be tough to show significant year to year gains. Look at how miserably the Gray model worked out, losing millions in sales and becoming the laughing stock of the agency and broadcast world. My bet is Sinclair will play both Katz and COX against each other, leveraging them both for a better rate/more service. They will probably focus heavier on their in-house unwired network money and continue to become a direct comp to ITN.

    Khristian Lee says:

    May 8, 2017 at 4:48 pm

    Gray didn’t set up an in-house rep firm, they put the work on the NSM’s and it crushed them. They’ll now have stations, and therefore office space in all the big markets. I don’t see how they couldn’t pull it off if they wanted to save millions. The O&O’s have been doing it for some time. Gray would be wise to scrap their current model and set up regional offices that handle business, not just two people overseeing the NSM’s handling of that business.

Matt Hortobagyi says:

May 8, 2017 at 5:54 pm

Biggest market Gray is in in Knoxville.

Cheryl Thorne says:

May 8, 2017 at 9:18 pm

Don’t give Gray the satisfaction of saying they even had a model…they are a bunch of small market and small minded operators who think they know what they are doing. “Thurston Howell” thought it would be sexy to own TV stations until he found out that he had no clue how to run them ..and the people around him knew no better. They are posers and the laughing stock of the local TV business..look at their latest quarterly report ..they are twisting their results to make it like they performed well..their results were lame..Hopefully they will sell and stop having good broadcasters that work for them go through torture each day