Are Julie Chen’s Talk Days Over?
Julie Chen‘s decision to sign off of last Thursday’s Big Brother with a not-so-subtle declaration of support for her disgraced husband Les Moonves is going to make it next to impossible for her to resume her day job on CBS’ The Talk, per multiple insiders (not to mention one of Chen’s daytime rivals).
“I think it’s going to be hard for her to go back to The Talk,” said The View‘s Joy Behar on Friday’s show. “What topics can they do? They can’t talk about the #MeToo movement without her coming clean about her husband.”
Moonves, CBS’ longtime CEO, was fired on Sept. 9 after a second wave of sexual misconduct allegations came to light. The next day, Chen announced that she “was taking a few days off from The Talk to be with my family,” adding, “I will be back soon and will see you Thursday night on Big Brother.” Chen did indeed return to Big Brother, but she ended the episode by telling viewers, “I’m Julie Chen Moonves. Good night.” (WATCH VIDEO HERE.)
Her non-traditional sign-off drew widespread condemnation on social media, with director Judd Apatow lamenting via Twitter that it was “cruel” to Moonves’ many victims. “Her husband threatened people and ruined careers,” Apatow added. “He sexually assaulted and harassed people… Maybe the shock and fear of her husband has damaged her and she isn’t seeing clearly — yet.” Actress Rosanna Arquette added, “At first I felt sorry for her and her child. But this is not OK.”
Chen’s Talk co-hosts awkwardly discussed their longtime leader’s absence last Monday, with Sharon Osbourne confessing, “It’s very embarrassing and upsetting to have to talk about [Julie’s] husband, but… we feel it’s right.” Regarding Moonves, Osbourne maintained, “Obviously the man has a problem.” Sara Gilbert also chimed in, saying that while she loves and supports Chen “always,” before adding, “This is an important time in our culture. And just because this hits close to home, it doesn’t change this story. All women’s stories matter. This is very serious and the appropriate actions need to take place.”
As of now, CBS is not commenting on whether Chen will return to The Talk on Monday. How do you see this cliffhanger playing out? Vote in the poll below and then elaborate in the comments.
There’s no way in the world that Julie will return to The Talk . She can’t. She should just take her severance package and leave. Then maybe she can drop this whole PR spin on social media about how much she’s backing her husband. Her husband has accumulated close to $1 B in compensation. Bye Felicia…I mean Julie.
How is it your business what she does in her marriage? I am so sick of the metoo crap. Its accusatuons without any proof. These allegations are ancient like over three decades old. If i were Julie i wouldnt go back on Talk after those backstabbers were disrespectful to her. Her hubby is worth 750 million amd she will get a huge payout.
Totally agreeJonnySBRO. It is times like this when you see who your friends are. And Sharon Osbourne should not be talking after all the cheating her husband did.
Beverly Coulson you are truly dumber than a box of rocks. Those situations are NOT even the same. Ozzy hasn’t sexually harassed anyone, nor threatened to ruin someone’s career if they didn’t have sex with him. Julie’s sexual predator husband did all that. Nice try on deflecting though. Plus Julie only got the jobs she did on CBS due to her husband. Her career is virtually over, I can’t see anyone wanting to hire her as long as she is attached to that sexual predator husband of hers
👍🏼👍🏼
You don’t even know if Ozzy has women he paid to be quiet, this is just the beginning of the movement. We would’ve never heard about the hair stylist lady if it weren’t for his daughter and his wife never left him. Julie shouldn’t be punished for what her husband did 20 or 30 years ago nor should her family (people are treating the spouses of the me too movement worse than a spouse of a serial killer or child molester) and its definitely not a good look to get rid of one of the very few Asians that are being represented.
Why not one wouldn’t hire her? She didn’t do anything, her husband did.
👍👍👍
You were there. How awesome. Why did you not try and stop him?
How would you know
Didn’t Ozzy try to kill Sharon?
THX, ANGELA WELL SAID FOR SETTING HER STRAIGHT!
Those who are guilty of foul behavior like Moonves will always be against the ‘Me Too’ movement.
Totally agree Angela. You said it perfectly.
Wow Angela…judge much? You have NO idea what you’re talking about and yet here you are calling someone else out about their intelligence? Osbourne has been accused of trying to kill his wife and called himself an abusive husband. So maybe Sharon should quit this show too??
Did I miss something? I have only read that Ozzy was involved in an extramarital affair. Hurtful and wrong but NOT the same thing as sexual assault! That was two consenting adults. Sexual assault is usually NOT two consenting parties!
Even Sharon was crying on the program in the past regarding Izzy. Hmmm
Ozzy almost murdered Sharon. Have u ever been on the internet ever?
He cheated
I agree, didn’t ozzy get busted a couple years ago with the hairdresser or something like that? She stood by her man. People in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. Besides in reality whatever they do in their marriage in none of my business, doesn’t make a difference in my life
There is a big difference between having an affair and sexual assault. You and many others will benefit by learning that so your statements won’t sound idiotic. Julie can stand by her guy all she wants, but sorry as far as the talk goes she would have no credibility whatsoever. Her best move is to leave instead of looking like a hypocrite when the subject arises again, which it will. I also wish people would stop making excuses for these men, because it happened years ago. It is wrong period, and those who justifies it maybe should self reflect.
Julie needs to understand the seriousness of her husbands accusers, take a step back and look at it from the outside.
She shouldn’t be giving advice on factual events when she doesn’t apply it to herself.
No different than Trump telling football players that kneel, to be “Patriotic” when he is not.
People keep saying stuff like her co hosts betrsyed her but that is ridiculous. They just told the truth and they were very respectful of julie. If they had NOT addressed it then everyone would be calling them hypocrites and MUCH worse
Kai, you are exactly right! It was quite obvious that the women on The Talk were not comfortable with discussing Julie’s husband and would probably have preferred not to discuss it at all. I agree that they were very respectful of Julie. It is their JOB to discuss these topics and they had no choice.
To call them hypocrites is ridiculous! If they ignored it they still would have been trashed.No winning with the wackos in today’s world.
You, idiots, are talking about a pervert who abused women. julie talked in her previous shows about the me too movement but when it’s her husband all bets are off and he’s the most wonderful person in the world. What a hypocrite!
Agreed
Bingo. She went on forever about Harvey Weinstein, but now that it’s her husband, it’s all lies. Give me a break.
Agreed
Yea, you apparently don’t get how this stuff works. Women who come forward and share their story is evidence. I’m sorry you don’t know that’s how it works – you have to tell someone something happened in order for anyone to know. And, you are factually inaccurate again; some accusations go back decades, some are much more recent. Given your misogyny, I’m not surprised you dislike MeToo, because the best thing women ever did for men was keep their mouths shut and that time is over.
So no proof of anything that happened just the words of two people involved where one says he did it and the other says he did not. Since when has our justice system become he said/she said.
Also, how do we know if any of these victims who have made complaints been compensated in any way?
When it becomes multiple parties coming forward it kind of becomes evident that something happened!
I agree
If an accuser had evidence beyond their stories, like say a tape recording or something, the accused would just say there were set up. That they were led to make those comments or the victims were responsive to the advances before what you would hear/see on a tape. It’s often a lose/lose situation for the victims which is why they don’t often come forward until others are willing to say they’ve been in the same situation. How are victims of sexual harassment and abuse supposed to bring forth evidence that will be considered enough for people who always want to side with the accused in these situations? Are they supposed to ask the accusers to wait a second while they get a witness? Take people back in time to show them what happened? Victims need support because there are always going to be jerks around who call them liars usually because they are connected to the accused or just like the accused or strangely don’t want to admit that they got fooled like everyone else by the public persona over the private one. And sadly sometimes they stick up for accused because they know their behavior is just like theirs and don’t want people calling them out on their horrible ways.
Just what proof do you want to see? What will satisfy you? I don’t think anything will, really. If someone is assaulted in a private office, what evidence can be produced other than someone coming forward with their account of the incident. They’re often discouraged from doing so by attitudes such as displayed in these comments here; shaming, blaming them for creating they compromising situation in the first place, not collecting instant sufficient evidence to satisfy doubters, not being considerate enough to allow men to control the victim’s narrative and experience. It doesn’t make much sense for people to make up stories out of the blue, especially when they are decades old and don’t reflect one or two incidents, but a pattern of behavior with multiple people over a sustained period of time. If you pay attention, you’ll hear Moonves himself admit to several encounters with his accusers, but minimize his actions. He didn’t harass his doctor, he only tried to kiss her; he made awkward passes at employees in the workplace, etc… There’s clearly much more to these stories and his conduct. If not, we’d know it because he’d still be at CBS and the results of the investigation would be finished and released already.
That’s correct, Fairmont1955. Also, I have a problem with those who think a woman should pay for her spouse’s accusations. For starters, this is probably why his first wife left him. That’s right for all the haters out there. SHE left him and did so before anything ever started between Julie and Moonves. As far as getting her jobs, she was already successful, having been a news anchor and then on the CBS morning show. She’s been on Big Brother since it began in 2000, several years before she and Moonves met. So much for him getting jobs for her.
Thank you! Sick of people saying she won’t get a job without him! People are so clueless about her career!
OMG thank you, you said it perfectly. The misogynists always say “no proof” when we wouldn’t even be hearing about it they weren’t credible complaints. How so these people think harassment can be proven? Let’s all wear body cameras I guess, and then a lot more creeps will those their jobs with all the PROOF.
I’m sure you say the same thing about allegations leveled at you, darling.
JONNYSBRO, aaaahh back to trolling again I see. Seriously dude STFU
If your defense is “it happened 30 years ago,” then you are acknowledging that it happened, THEREFORE, the question is not why does it matter, but why in 30 years he’s done NOTHING to atone
Why 30 years after the fact,it is so hypocritical didn’t you enjoy dancing on the boss desk to get a better position or promotion?Waiting 30 years?Come on
So child like.
I so agree
It is in Julie’s best interest to support her husband Leslie Moonves. He is worth over $700 million dollars. She can end her CBS contracts with Big Brother and The Talk, see how the accusations play out. Then she could decide if she wants to continue being married or divorce him. Julie and her son are set for life either way.
Agreed! Funny how 20 years later, women are hurt and need to ruin a career for 5 minutes of fame, or compensation. No one speaks about women, 20 years ago, walking around in short skirts and low-cut shirts purposely looking for a raise or a promotion, or a rich older man. Where are men to complain? Nowhere!
You’re disgusting.
I agree
You’re absolutely right!
Right. Now a days young women go around in shorts that look like a thong and skirts not much longer. What are we doing as women. It is like a bank placing the money on the sidewalk out front and expecting anyone to steal it.
We all need to pray for our country. All this stuff going on is an elaborate attack to destroy us.
Your disgusting post sounds like you are saying these women got what they asked for. So if your daughter wore a short skirt she would deserve to be sexually assaulted???
Gina, if you haven’t walked in the shoes of these women you have no idea of which you speak. What a woman wears does not give permission for forceful advances, or threats from a man. I was brought up by a father who always accused the woman of being responsible for being raped because “she” wore sexy clothes or “asked for it” for some other reason. It was never the mans fault. When it happened to me, he was forced to rethink his stand. It doesn’t matter how long ago these incidents happened and I totally understand why women didn’t make it public back then or for that matter now. We have been taught for generations that it’s our fault and that nobody will believe us.
I hope you continue to be sick of this #MeToo crap because it’s not going anywhere and these vile predators deserve to pay… I don’t care if it happened 5, 10 or 50 years ago!
Everyone wants to get pay and claim harrasment years ago,im also tire of this bull crap. It is unbelievable what our sociaty has become.
Honest question: why is it less bad if it happened a long time ago? There has been a culture in business that women have to accept this kind of behavior from men without complaining. That’s finally changing, and it is catching up to the offenders. All in all, if losing his job with a nice severance package is the worst thing that happens to Moonves over this, he made out better than his victims. Future executive pay packages should have clawback clauses in the event of this kind of behavior – you don’t want the guy that won’t sign that contract working for you – he’s going to cause problems eventually. One can only wonder about the behavior of those, like Norm MacDonald, who defend this conduct.
The moment she put’s her marriage into the public spotlight, it becomes the public’s business. If she wanted privacy she should have kept her mouth shut like she said would. Multiple accusers don’t come forward with the same accusations, simply because they decide to jump on the bandwagon!
I agree
You’re an idiot
I total agree 👏👏 Who’s business is it anyway 👍
I don’t agree. I am not a fan of Julie Chen but I support her right to support her marriage and not be punished for it. She is arguably the most qualified person on the Talk and a valuable asset to CBS regardless who she is married to…
I just don’t see why they wait over 30 or more years to come out with accusations of sexual assault..even judge kavanaugh is suppose to get voted yes or nae for supreme CT..now some lady is accusing him
If this really happened to all these women why didn’t they call the police and report it when it happened instead of waiting over 30 years..all the evidence is gone…also in most of these cases their is small kids, that’s who I feel bad for.
this is why women continue to suffer bc of totally uninformed, unsuportive, victim-shaming & blaming & utterly clueless women like you who make totally stupid comments like this. You couldn’t report back then and you still can’t bc of fear and intimidation and threats, job loss, unequal power dynamics, no protection from “HR” or any laws, certain career ending scenario in your field if you dare say anything, loss of ability to support yourself and your family, a lifetime of hard fought education and 24-7 work days gone in an instant if you say anything, no one believing you, very real post traumatic stress disorder essentially paralyzing you with fear and shame and anxiety and depression, and there was no system in place or rules or laws or anyone “to run out and report it to” and frankly still isn’t for the majority of nonfamous hard working women in businesses everywhere… Women are finally feeling at least some ability to speak up now bc others finalky have so they feel a bit safer so that is why women are first coming forward now, not bc they are making it up but bc perhaps now their entire lives might not get destroyed if they do bc finally some are being taken seriously and believed and action taken to rid out the dusgusting monsters who have been perpretating this disgusting lack of respect for women and violence since the beginning of time. And did you stop to think that perhaps reading hearing and seeing all of this come out now has made those of us who have sufferred silently for decades and buried and hidden these awful experiences as best we could all these years, that it has brought back our own traumas directly to the forefront bc we can directly relate to everything these brave women coming forward have gone through bc it happened to us too but we had no idea bc it is so isolating and hidden that it hapoened to millions of others too???
Yes, absolutely, this. Any reporting would not be believed, or you’d be told you asked for it, or you’d be transferred to some backwater, or you’d be frozen out of your profession, or all of the above.
I agree. I think some people are paid to make trouble. This day and time, it all seems to depend on what side of the fence you’re on. There’s nothing you can do or say anymore that doesn’t offend people. Sad.
It’s not about punishment. Of course she can support her husband. That’s her business. It has more to do with credibility and what her continued presence would mean for the show. Over the past year The Talk has dealt with many news-breaking stories related to the #MeToo issue. Weinstein, Spacey, Cosby, and others have been torn to shreds by the hosts of The Talk. They’ve also discussed family, friends, and associates of the accused being in denial (like Camile Cosby). Most entertainment gossip of the salacious variety ends up a topic of discussion on the show. It would be difficult to address those issues with the knowledge that Julie’s husband, the ex-head of CBS and everyone’s former boss is under the same scrutiny, left without a clean resolution and would most likely be an off-the-table subject. This would seriously affect the integrity of the show. Also, on a personal level, how comfortable would Julie be (or the other hosts), knowing how her co-hosts slammed her husband on air, returning to the show trying to put on a friendly face among people who’ve made public their negative feelings about something so personal to her. The awkwardness might turn-off viewers.
Omg how come people dont understand that they HAD to talk about it. It would have looked really bad for the show if they hadnt. Julie SHOULD quit because it would be waaayyy too awkward to discuss certain topics in light of her situatoon.
Her co host were being honest, I use to be a fan of Julie bit after her appearance on big brother, that was to much,she needs to stay off the talk.
Right. It is turning back on women. I’m not a young person. I was taught over 50 yrs ago to let someone know if someone touches me inappropriately or tries to abuse me. I know that has been taught ever since. Respect yourself enough to tell. I was taught to expect to be treated with respect. Not dress or act sexy around men. Don’t go swimming in a shark tank. Use your brain. So I’m sure women were taught this too but maybe like the attention so tested the waters.
I hope so!!!!
Agreed.
With all this metoo …let her be..she has nothing to do with what her husband did .
she is her own person..if she supports her husband let her..its her. Perogative!!
We want her classy act back on the Talk! She is talented! The show won’t survive without her anyway! They need the Usual Five Host!
All husbands and grown boyfriends have a past. None of our business especially when the me too girls ALL claim to be saints. I can’t wait for the tables to turn on Me too!
We want her classy act back on the Talk! She is talented! The show won’t survive without her anyway! They need the Usual Five Host!
All husbands and grown boyfriends have a past. None of our business especially when the me too girls ALL claim to be saints. I can’t wait for the tables to turn on Me too!
Ah yes the incessant ringing of the “me too” cowbell, where whatever happens between people is the whole worlds business.
In most of these cases evidence is sketchy, at best, and generally supported with evermore voices that are proff-less. In instances where the evidence is solid if prosecution is still possible it should be so, but kangarooing people without proof is ridiculous.. especially within the American judicial system.
As for Mrs. Moonves, who cares? Nothing she’s ever been involved with has ever had any quality or merit and the only reason she has been involved in anything is due to her useless husband. Perhaps they will leave us in peace and in doing so find their own.
I was thinking maybe she’d return after a few weeks, letting the story die down— but now every time a new person is accused or “falls from grace”, she will be the story instead of reporting on the story. Even if Louis C.K. does another set… she will be hit with questions.
“Falls from grace” seriously?! He’s a predator!
Julie I love you, you can not fight your battle
Aside from what she was obviously saying with her sign-off on Big Brother, she was also telling CBS they can’t trust her on live TV anymore, so I wouldn’t be surprised to see someone else hosting Big Brother next week (maybe Marissa Jaret Winokur and Ross Mathews).
I hadn’t thought about that that! Wow! 100% correct! How can you trust her on live TV after that? Probably 50-75% of what she does requires her being on live TV. Yeah, she’s toast!
Big Brother is over in a week and a half … Julie Chen will appear on 2 episodes … I doubt they will replace her till after the season is over … It’s the 20th season of Big Brother and maybe it will be the last …
There isn’t even a 1% chance Big Brother is canceled. Look at the numbers it pulls in the summer. It’s cheap to make, pulls a reliable audience, eats up three hours of summer real estate and is regularly beating its competition in the time slot. There is absolutely no chance of it being axed.
Big Brother is on a 5 second delay. They could have cut the last word of her sign-off out of the “live” broadcast if they so desired and can do so in the future. .
That’s not the point. Would you put a host back on the air, knowing she could say something inappropriate at any moment? The View is on a time delay, too, but they didn’t let Star Jones back on the air after she suddenly announced her departure from the show.
If she’s going to stand by her man she should step aside from both The Talk and Big Brother. Apparently she has no remorse for what her dirty old husband did. Shame on you!!
How do u all know they are true? The allegations are 30 years old. Why take this many years to say something if its not manipulated. Julie is the best thing about BB.
If you haven’t seen answers to the question of why people wait to come forward by now, you aren’t paying attention. It’s been answered over and over, with several legitimate reasons (fear, shame, guilt, and more). When you asked a question like that, the way you did, you don’t want to believe it, so you won’t. Just think about the people who have suffered at the hands of sexual predators, and what your refusal to believe them might be doing to them. That’s another reason.
TV GORD JONNYSBRO is a troll. I’m very familiar with him from another message board. He’s truly as dumb as he seems and a troll to boot
bravo, so well said, thank you for getting it!!!
Why should she have remorse for what someone else has done. She is not at fault. Also these allegations are from 30 years ago.
Seems like you need to read up and get current- some allegations date back 30+ years, some are much more recent as in only a few years ago. Also, all it takes was one time for him to be guilty and have done it. Time doesn’t undo crime ;)
Les Moonves cheated on his wife WITH Julie Chen, so, she know he isn’t an honest man!
exactly!
All these accusation were way before Julie got with him..not that it matters but just saying this was before she met him ..they should take all there money and move to a different country..sell be all of their houses and start over..get your little boy out of this environment…change your names also .
Lisa Black you said “what her dirty old husband did”. Your were either there and witnessed ‘it’or your omnipotent. How are you so sure and who are you to judge.
Absolutey narcissistic behavior on Chen’s part.
ABC got rid of Roseanne.
CBS needs to let Chen go
Why should she apologize for her husband’s actions or lose her job? She didn’t do anything wrong. Take time off to let the story die down then go back. If a similar topic comes up she can simply let the other hosts discuss it without commenting and then move on.
I personally have no issues with Julie Chen supporting her husband, but by doing that, she’s pretty much alienating a lot of woman who watch The Talk and is no longer relatable. I don’t really see the need for her to return at this point.
Julie should it have to pay the price of what her husband has done. She has always been professional and did her job. She would be a victim also losing a job because of a man. Stay strong Julie Chen
Yeah, support your rapist husband, Julie! You are truly doing God’s work.
🙊🙊🙊
I woulnt want to sit in the far left henhouse after Les’s fickle pickle trouble.
I predict Julie will stick with BB until the end of the season (which is less than two weeks away) and she’ll continue to be on vacation from The Talk. After the BB finale is aired she’ll leave CBS. They’re probably working out the details behind the scenes.
I think she needs to be brave enough to go back to work knowing that she did nothing wrong. If Les committed these atrocities then he will get what is coming to him, and as his spouse, Julie will feel the brunt. Notwithstanding, Julie needs to maintain her independence and continue with her work. I hope that she doesn’t let a bunch of critics shame her from making a living and moving forward. Quitting is not the answer to anything. She has no control over what Les did and she should not have to take responsibility for it – other than by standing by the victims and supporting what is right. Which all of us need to do.
Don’t forget that Julie got involved with him while he was still married and had her wedding a few days after his divorce was finalized. And he had been trying to get with several other women, who have come forward about it, before he got involved with Chen. And you can expect to hear more stories like Linda Bloodsworth’s about his sexism, now that women are not fearful of retaliation. She’s been a staple of Big Brother and they’ll let her keep that gig, but EVERYONE knows she got The Talk because of her husband. She should just go away after BB20 is done until next summer. It’s not like she’s hurting for money.
Leave the moonves alone already.
Regarding Julie Chen’s loyalty to her husband… the test for her is, if this information hadn’t come to the fore, would she want to be with him? If yes, than she has to deal with the current reality and be strong in her loyalty. If not, good bye felicia. And the public opinion is moot.
why in the hell should she be punished, i swear all americans want to do is tear one another down.
I do not want to go in too hard on Julie Chen. She might have a reason for supporting her husband as misguided as it may seem. However, I don’t think I can ever look at her the same way. I really liked her early on in her career at CBS but recently there has been something fake and grandiose about her that borders on the comical. You can almost picture her saying to herself “Yeah, I’m a BIG deal!”. Lol. Her early statement of support for her husband coupled with her defiant sign off is just too much to stomach. CBS should offer her a severance package and let her become someone’s problem. I kind of want to feel sorry for her but she did this to herself.
Well put.
Absolutely agree! Also, everyone feeling sorry for Julie must have missed all the times on The Talk when she acted so high and mighty talking about her “perfect marriage” when they would discuss others cheating. It is kind of comical and a actually perfect karma coming back to her, especially when she cheated with Les before he was divorced. Bye, bye, Julie. Good riddance!
Not a fan of JC. Always wondered why she had the jobs she did but we know why…..she married the BOSS. CBS Should never allowed NEPOTISM. Ever heard of sleeping your way to the top. CBS should cut its losses. You have to remember the many shows that Moonves “created” are all about creating and backstabbing…..Big Bro, Survivor. He cheated on the first wife and probably done it on the his one too. JC knew but had 2 shows that were part of the deal…….you support me and I will support you.
Think about it.
It is really sad.
Sure, she wants to believe her husband. Who wouldn’t in her place? But the stories (and the people who have gone on the record with them) are very credible and if she wants to keep a career, she better separate herself from him and the toxic power structure that enabled his gross behavior and her jobs on Big Brother and The Talk. If she wants to go down with the ship, so be it. Buh bye, Mrs. Moonves!
1. You don’t know if the stories are credible since there is no proof at all
2. You are asking a woman to give up on her husband and father of her child for a job.
You dont know julie and we do not know whats going on so we pass judgement on her
Bring back Aisha Tyler as the leader and moderator – give Aisha the big bucks!
I enjoyed watching ”The Talk”. Most comments made on this show are conversational and based on there own opions. Julie was and is a wonderful host. Sometimes people hide behind there pain and own situations by talking about other topics. When a person becomes victim it is not always easy to come out yes it takes years to find that comfort zone to speak up. Several people have come forward and he has to be proven guilty of something before we should all judge. CBS is just as wrong as Julie for using her married name and CBS wanting to keep everything confidential. During this time it’s Julie decision what she does but if she returns to the talk I do not think she should elaborate about an ongoing investigation until it’s over but she should not have to pay for her husbands dealings.
That sounds like great idea. And she doesn’t have all that baggage that Julie has.
it is a difficult position for any spouse on the public sector or not to find out that their mate has been sexually inappropriate. give her time to adjust. she will divorce him and speak up for “me too
She got herself evicted.
Companion questions are about “Big Brother.” Will she host future seasons? Will CBS want her? Will she even finish the live broadcasts the last two weeks of the season? I’m sure everybody is saying to the last question “of course, no other choice, and if she ever wants a job anywhere on TV again, she’ll lumber through the finale.” And while that is likely, I still wonder. And the rule that large there has to be some understudy contingency plan if nothing else for traffic fatalities, heart attacks or whatever. I’m wondering if somebody is sprucing up that back-up plan just in case?
She will be back I believe simply because if she really stands by him then she’ll need to defend him on on there
Stand by your man, Julie! He hasn’t been convicted of anything, except in the court of public opinion.
I think the rest of the cast of The Talk should quit and it should be recast with people who will support Julie.
No. If she comes back, she should face the opinions and comments of her co-hosts, not have co- hosts who would cater to her. Besides, they didn’t say anything negative about her unless I missed something.
She has the right to support her husband and should still be able to do the show with that same right and opinion for the topic when it comes up again which it will…..it’s called Freedom of speech. She isn’t responsible for her husband’s past behavior
Please stop with Freedom of Speech. It has no bearing here. Look up what it actually means. How many times does it have to be explained before y’all get it?
She will come back if for no other reason to defend hubby. She will be wrong but she will be back.
I really dont see why Julie would have a problem discussing the “MeToo” movement…she frowned on spouses cheating (ex: Ozzy Osbourne) knowing she dated her predator husband while he was married to someone else….shes trash!