FCC Going Door To Door With Auction Pitch

Agency officials are planning to meet with individual broadcasters to persuade them to participate in an auction intended to repurpose broadcast spectrum for smartphones and other wireless devices.

Hoping to ramp up broadcast participation in the FCC’s incentive auction next year, agency officials are planning to start reaching out to individual broadcasters, agency officials announced today.

The FCC officials did not say specifically when the one-on-one sessions would begin — or which TV stations will be targeted first. But during an FCC meeting in Washington, agency executives said the one-on-one sessions were critical to trying to persuade balking broadcasters to play ball in an auction intended to repurpose broadcast spectrum for smartphones and other wireless devices.

“We do not want to hold a party and have nobody show up, so our outreach to broadcasters must be more than broad,” said FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, a Democrat. “One-to-one outreach is essential.”

“We completely agree that broadcaster participation is a key to the whole auction,” added Gary Epstein, chair of the FCC’s incentive auction task force.

Epstein said that the one-on-one sessions would begin before the agency adopts the auction rules this spring. “We do not intend to wait for [the rules to be adopted] to ratchet up an increased targeted individual broadcaster effort,” he said.

The one-on-one sessions are likely to strike a raw nerve in some broadcasters because they need to get their licenses renewed and their station acquisitions approved by the agency, according to one broadcast industry source.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

“These are the guys [FCC officials] who can regulate you out of business if you don’t play ball with them,” the source said.

Also during the meeting, FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai, a Republican, suggested that the agency partner with the National Association of Broadcasters, “somebody broadcasters trust,” to help the agency pitch the auctions to broadcasters.

In addition, Pai said the agency should pull the plug on any plans to change the agency’s regulations on joint sales and shared services agreements.

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler has publicly said that he wants the agency to beef up its scrutiny of the sharing arrangements.

JSAs and SSAs, which allow broadcasters to save money by sharing costs, have been routinely approved by the agency in the past.

“Targeting JSAs and SSAs could harm the FCC’s relationship with broadcasters at the very time we need their cooperation in order to make the incentive auction a success,” Pai said. “I strongly oppose regulatory ratchets designed to pressure broadcasters into participating in the incentive auction.”

Pai also recommended that the FCC tell broadcasters “as quickly as possible” how much money they might be able to get from participating in the auctions. “We need to turn the abstract concept of the incentive into the concrete reality of cash,” he said.

Said Dennis Wharton, an NAB spokesman, in response: “We wholeheartedly support the FCC’s incentive auction process and agree with Commissioner Pai that NAB can play a valuable role, if called upon. We also appreciate Commissioner Pai making it clear that the FCC should not use other broadcast-related proceedings to persuade TV broadcasters to relinquish spectrum in the incentive auction. As Congress made clear, the incentive auction should be completely voluntary and broadcasters should not be coerced into participating in any manner.”

Preston Padden, executive director of the Expanding Opportunities for Broadcasters Coalition, representing stations considering participating in the auction, said: “We commend the hardworking and transparent auction task force on an excellent and informative progress report.  If the commission meets the price expectations of willing sellers, this voluntary auction will be a great success.”

Also today, the FCC announced that Howard Symons, a former attorney with the law firm Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, had been named vice chair of the incentive auction task force. Symons was previously an attorney for the House telecommunications subcommittee.


Comments (9)

Leave a Reply

Ellen Samrock says:

January 30, 2014 at 4:06 pm

And I can just hear their sales pitch: “Hi, we’re here to inspect your station including the public file. Ha, ha. Just kidding. No, we just wanted to know if you want to participate in the incentive auction. By the way, that’s a real nice looking license you have right now. It would be a shame if anything happened to it.” The unnamed source has it right. There is no such thing as a friendly visit from the FCC and for them to ask for participation in the incentive auction is little more than coercion.

ABELARDO BLANCO says:

January 30, 2014 at 4:20 pm

absolutely right, DBP! Like the scene from the Godfather, where either the bandleader’s brains or his signature were going to be on the contract.

Keith ONeal says:

January 30, 2014 at 4:23 pm

In past years, the FCC has dumped channels 70-83, and later, 52-69 from the UHF TV Band. That’s NOT enough? Now they want to dump channels 32-51? Get real, FCC!

Teri Green says:

January 30, 2014 at 4:46 pm

The broadcasters DO NOT OWN their frequencies now. Simply don’t renew their licenses. The FCC needs to petition congress for this power. OTA should be limited to standard definition quality only. This would allow a drastic reduction of needed bandwidth. Those who want high def TV can pay for it via cable or dishes. TV stations should only be allowed ONE CHANNEL not six. High def is a gimick, is the football game any better if you can see a player’s helmet? Is “The Big Bang Theory” any funnier if Sheldon’s pores are clearly visible? Is the local news any better if you can see an anchorman? No it’s not.

    charles spencer says:

    January 30, 2014 at 5:29 pm

    Eric is absolutely correct. In the same spirit, I say that we also move all of the FM stations into the AM band, because even though FM is sonically better and easier to listen to, given the same programming, Eric has correctly pointed out that 300-3000 HZ is GOOD ENOUGH.

bill schneider says:

January 30, 2014 at 4:47 pm

So great the FCC in serving the public will sell spectrum, that has been pioneered and vested in the concept of provifding free entertainment and critical community services to the public with private investment, to subscriber driven models that can be monitored and controled by the government at will, for a monthly fee the public will now pay for what was previously free. Get the public to demand a service he is required to pay for. Hell of a plan wish I had thought of it sooner. So broadcasters can be good citizens and support this plan or fight for the right to continue to fund news departmnents and programming focused on their communities and be reflected as bad citizens. What a choiice I sure they can’t wait for the call.

bill schneider says:

January 30, 2014 at 4:54 pm

Sorry you live in such a data cocoon Eric, let me introduce you to thousands of retirement home communities that can only afford one shared TV yes a big on, yes high def, old eyes can see better with larger, brighter and yes sharper clearer pictures, all for free, no cable fee no sat fee and no data or internet acces fee for full hign quality information and entertainment. So you go tell your grandmother she is not important anymore and tell all of those able to only get free tv they don’t matter.

Abbie Harrison says:

January 30, 2014 at 11:34 pm

Here’s hoping these “companies” that the FCC is wanting to talk to are the ones who buy up stations to lay off employees, run them at the bare minimum, and pipe in automated, outside programming just so they can achieve “must carry” status on cable and satellite. If the only thing that makes a station “local” is the ID keyed on every hour….this spectrum should be the first to go!!!!

Kent Haehl says:

February 3, 2014 at 1:01 pm

So, the part that most broadcasters seem to forget is that the whole reason for the auction is to gain bandwidth for internet wireless providers. That in turn adds competition to broadcasters, but ALSO removes any white space that we all use for wireless microphones, wireless EIM’s, wireless IFB’s, wireless intercoms, etc., etc. The 2.4GHz band is already crammed full of WiFi and every other unlicensed wireless device out there, and is not a reliable option for production. Don’t sell your souls to the FCC!!! Keep our white spaces!!!!