MARKETSHARE BY P.J. BEDNARSKI

LPTV In Atlanta, Portland Live Or Die By OTA

Without must carry, LP stations might rely on viewers with antennas and the willingness to receive TV over the air. One LP operator in Atlanta sees this as a challenge. He is promoting OTA reception the best he can. Another, in Portland, Ore., warns that the FCC spectrum grab is going to make it tougher for LPs and full-power stations alike.

For the last week or so, I’ve retreated from the full cable television experience, mainly because the picture on my Sharp HD television — scarcely four years old — began to look like an Andy Warhol painting. A bad main board, a repairman told me, as if I know from main boards.

Mr. Sharp, if you’re reading, let this be an example of word-of-mouth advertising.

Since deciding to spend $300 to fix it, I’ve had to content myself — a good phrase, I guess — with watching TV from an old, tiny, analog portable hooked into basic cable that gets Philadelphia channels and a few cable networks.

And I realized something: I’m a pretty good television watcher, but, overwhelmingly, I watch broadcast TV and video from the Internet.

Most of the rest of the stuff I get from my Comcast Kitchen-Sink-Plus service is wasted on me. I really ought to quit cable, get myself a good antenna, and see how it feels.

In Portland, Ore., and in Atlanta, two operators of low-power TV stations would like to see that. In fact, they would like to see everybody unshackle themselves from wires and dishes.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

In Atlanta, Vince Castelli runs Prism TV, which owns two LPs, WANN and the WTBS (yes, the call letters once owned by Ted Turner). Making use their multicasting capability, the stations offer a variety of services like the Oldie Goldie vintage movie network, ThisTV, LATV and France 24, an English-language, but obviously French news service.    

Castelli, like other people in the LP sphere, is passionate about his business and especially over-the-air TV mainly because LPs don’t have must carry rights. They can’t force cable systems to carry any of their services and most don’t. Of course, retrans fees are only a dream.

Castelli likes to point people toward his website, freetvatlanta.com. It lists some 70 OTA channels available in that market. The website says that’s more than any other city except Los Angeles.

Twenty of those channels are TV services from WANN and WTBS and another 20 are dedicated WANN-WTBS simulcasts of Atlanta radio stations, though only about half of those “radio on TV” channels are up and running.

“Why pay hundreds of dollars every year to watch your favorite channels?” the website asks, a question that is a lot more potent now as cable and satellite rates go up, and consumers worry about $4 a gallon gasoline and a weak economy.

Another page points out that a viewer could see Glee or American Idol on over-the-air Fox for free, along with more obscure services like Tuff-TV, a sports channel offered on one of the WANN subchannels. WANN’s own website gives viewers tips on how to install their own antennas.

The fact is, if you were to go OTA, it would be to watch the major networks, not Oldie Goldie or ThisTV or Jewelry TV. Still it’s true, when Castelli says, “We’ve got channels you can’t get on cable.”

Castelli, who prefers to call himself the stations’ media coordinator, says he’s now working on a deal to buy a “container-load of inexpensive, high-quality antennas in the next 30 days” and by using the barter time he gets on those radio stations, advertise them to viewers. He talks about mounting an old-fashioned “grass roots campaign, knocking on front doors” to sell antennas.

He thinks all of Atlanta is his market, not just poorer people, and makes the perfectly valid point that OTA HD looks a lot better than when it gets delivered via cable or satellite.

He does point out Atlanta’s Hispanic population increased by an amazing 50% in the last decade, that Hispanics are statistically more likely to be over-the-air viewers than the general population and that WANN carries several Hispanic channels.

In Portland, Greg Herman operates four low-power channels through his WatchTV. He’s convinced that full-power broadcasters no longer want to encourage consumers to receive TV over the air because of the retransmission consent deals they have made with cable and satellite operators.

These low power guys say it’s not in affiliates’ immediate financial interest to encourage anybody to cut the cable chord. They can enjoy that swim in that dual revenue stream just like CNN or any other cable network. Encouraging viewers to hook up to an antenna might damage the business arrangement they now have with cable operators.  

“They’re allowing a different business to control their business,” Herman says. “They’re abdicating their service to cable and satellite operator. These guys have been neutered by the cable industry. Retransmission consent fees are their crack cocaine. History will prove me right.”

Herman, who’s applied for, and been denied, experimental licenses by the FCC, is a passionate broadcaster who worries that the commission will repack the broadcast spectrum to give more to wireless operators.

The fall guys will be not only be low-power outlets like his, but also other broadcasters that are weaker echoes of what they once were.

It won’t be easy for low-power broadcasters to amass huge audiences by relying on people with antennas. In Atlanta, Castelli estimates the OTA crowd at just 10% of the population. Not being on cable and not having many possible OTA viewers, he says, “keep me in a straitjacket.”

In Portland, where there’s a stick-it-to-the-man attitude within the sizeable granola populace there, Herman estimates the OTA audience is as much as 14%.

Herman says he’s quite sure that at any point, he has 60,000-100,000 viewers, but that’s a guess. He says he’s operating his channels “pretty much on my own dime.”

“I’ve had one cable operator tell me, ‘Why would I want to enable a competitor if I don’t have to? I sell low-cost advertising too,'” Herman says. “In all fairness, I see the point. You know, don’t get mad at a lion if he eats you. That’s what they do.”


Market Share by P.J. Bednarski, all about TV sales and TV sales people, appears every other week in TVNewsCheck. Bednarski is longtime TV reporter and a former top editor at TV Week and B&C. If you have comments on this column or ideas for future ones, contact him at [email protected]. Read earlier Market Share columns here.


Comments (16)

Leave a Reply

Robert Klein says:

April 25, 2011 at 2:53 pm

140 plus stations available over the air in Los Angeles with a really strong outdoor antenna, otherwise you can get over 100 stations with good rabbit-ears.

Trudy Handel says:

April 25, 2011 at 3:19 pm

I’m trying to figure out how Herman can have 60,000 to 100,000 viewers when all his stations are currently off the air, so far as I know.

    T Kuhn says:

    April 26, 2011 at 7:43 am

    Have you asked him?

Kathryn Miller says:

April 25, 2011 at 3:51 pm

LPTVs are always a challenge to run, particularly in large cities and without cable carriage. But when you owe your largest vendors, say, $225K (or more) “multicast market coverage” is possible only as long as the gear isn’t repossessed. Train wrecks are almost fun to watch when you’re not personally or professionally affected by the outcome. It’s funny how “10 tv stations” in a market can turn into “2” in just two weeks.

April Davis says:

April 25, 2011 at 3:55 pm

F24? It is about France than you would think. IMHO France24 appeals to the same psycho/demographic as NPR. Intelligent, insightful, and global and huge. They were atop Tunisia before others.. Ivory Coast? Probably no live feeds or reporters on the ground, if there was ANY coverage on CNN or FOX.

Ellen Samrock says:

April 25, 2011 at 3:58 pm

Unfortunately, it will likely be LPTV that will feel the full blunt force trauma of Obama’s ambitions to reclaim spectrum. Now is the time for LPTV station owners to begin campaigning for must-carry rights before their signals are repacked into oblivion.

    Kathryn Miller says:

    April 25, 2011 at 5:10 pm

    Been there, tried that. The only Bush I veto (upheld) and that was after John Dingell (who still holds the same position as committee chairman) eviscerated the bill to make it unusable. This matter will be trampled under bigger feet this time around.

    Ellen Samrock says:

    April 25, 2011 at 6:49 pm

    And former FCC chairman Kevin Martin tried unsuccessfully to get must carriage rights for LPTV as well. So what? It is a status still worth pushing for and especially so now since what Obama is proposing will essentially “eviscerate” the entire broadcast industry.

    Kathryn Miller says:

    April 25, 2011 at 6:57 pm

    LPTVs are lost in the dust when elephants fight. Note that the FCC doesn’t have the jurisdiction today to either re-allocate spectrum, move broadcasters, impose broadband auctions, or grant LPTV’s must carry. How many battles do you think Congresscritters can handle at the same time?

douglas skene says:

April 25, 2011 at 7:34 pm

I can tell you I have viewers and a lot of them OTA we cover 1.18 million homes and have several cable system as well for all three of our channels but we need must carry. It is not for the eyeballs it is for the bussiness owners eyeballs “If I can not see it no one can” Our viwers are increasign every day and bussiness as well but fighting the big cable system lack of carriage it is up hill battle. All that said we are the only stations that bring local may of the local sports ans other events, we are the only place that gets local produced TV shows out there unlike many of the network stations without us you get only a few voices and those are not free to speak

    Kathryn Miller says:

    April 25, 2011 at 8:18 pm

    You can negotiate carriage; it stats with you paying the out-of-market copyright liability for the cable company. You can also get aggressive promotions making fun of what cable customers are missing out on. Think globally, act locally. We both know congress is a dead-end on this issue.

    Ellen Samrock says:

    April 25, 2011 at 10:20 pm

    And that is the main point. Cable carriage is for the benefit of advertisers. Business owners who advertise need the reassurance of cable, even though cable can have limited household penetration compared to OTA which actually offers the greatest potential in household penetration.

mike tomasino says:

April 25, 2011 at 9:36 pm

Cable/Satellite is the obsolete technology. I’m currently watching “The Who” on “The Cool TV” on KMGH! LPs can fill out the spectrum, and the programming choices. May cable become just another ISP option.

Christina Perez says:

April 26, 2011 at 12:15 pm

OTA provides the best quality picture, less compressed than cable, and it’s FREE — but broadcasters won’t promote the two attributes that makes their medium unique and powerful: its free, universal availability, and its quality signal. The reason is GREED. Broadcasting always will remain the most efficient mass media — unless broadcasters commit industry suicide. The new mobile TV standard should be promoted as a FREE service, no cost of entry whatsoever, and broadcasters can make their money by selling add-on services and channels. Mobile could be the savior of OTA broadcast TV — if it weren’t for the greed of the people who control the corporations that own the station groups.

William Winborne says:

April 26, 2011 at 6:25 pm

Switched from Comcast digital cable to OTA recently, and I’m SHOCKED by how clear the network HD signals are in OTA, even compared to my previous cable company’s so-called “HD” channels. The cheapest TV-only package available from my new cable company (RCN) is $75/month. Ummm… how about “no.” I get 37 stations where I am, and am now paying the cable company exactly $0.

The only thing that would get me back onto cable is if there was a $14.99 or less option that isn’t just air channels plus infomercials, public access, and home shopping. So many people are simply “used” to paying for TV they don’t even realize that they don’t have to.

    Kathryn Miller says:

    April 27, 2011 at 12:31 pm

    broadcast HDTV is the “bomb.”