TVNEWSCHECK FOCUS ON BUSINESS

CBS Targets Gray For Hefty Comp Raise

Gray Television, whose affiliation agreement with CBS expires by year end, looks likely to be a significant contributor in getting CBS to its stated target of $1 billion in retrans and reverse comp revenue by 2017. Sources say the network wants Gray to pay up to 90 cents per month per TV household in comp. And that's just the beginning. "CBS may target Gray, but they will go after everybody else in very short order," says a source familiar with the players.

CBS is upping the ante in reverse compensation negotiations, asking as much as 90 cents per month per TV household from Gray Television, according to informed sources.

CBS boss Les Moonves has boasted that the company will hit $1 billion in retrans and reverse compensation revenue by 2017 and $2 billion by 2020.

Gray, whose affiliation agreement with CBS expires by year end, looks likely to be a significant booster in getting CBS to those targets.

Officials at Gray and CBS declined to comment.

Gray has paid little or nothing in reverse compensation to CBS, according to sources, largely because its affiliation agreements reach back into a past when paying for network programming wasn’t part of the deal.

“Les is probably reminding them they’ve had a free ride for some years,” says Edward Atorino, a securities analyst with Benchmark Capital.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

There’s a difference between ask and get, but if anything like the 90-cent figure sticks, it would cut deeply into Gray’s finances.

Gray is heavily dependent on its CBS affiliates, which accounted for 45% of its $346.2 million in revenue in 2013, according to the company’s annual report.

Counting all acquisitions pending at the time that report was issued a month ago, Gray operates — or soon will operate — CBS affiliates in 21 markets. Combined, they will reach some 4.2 million homes. At even 80 cents per home, Gray would owe CBS $40 million a year, the same amount that it took in from all of its retransmission consents deals in 2013.

CBS is clearly breaking new reverse comp ground with Gray.

According to a November 2013 report from Wells Fargo analyst Marci Ryvicker, CBS is on target to achieve its 2017 goal of $1 billion based on retrans of $1 and reverse comp of just 50 cents.

A number of groups will be paying close attention to how the CBS-Gray negotiations shake out. That was a popular unofficial topic at the NAB Show last week.

LIN Media and Media General, which recently announced plans to merge, will be paying particularly close attention. LIN has seven CBS affiliates and Media General has three. Contracts between the network and both those groups expire by year end.

That’s not all. Contracts encompassing 91 other CBS affiliate expire by the end of 2018, according to research from SNL Kagan.

“CBS may target Gray, but they will go after everybody else in very short order,” says a source familiar with the players.

That’s what happened three years ago when Fox pushed the boundary to 50 cents per subscriber in year four of affiliation contracts. There was a lot of hand-wringing and gnashing of teeth but, for the most part, Fox apparently got what it wanted.

“The numbers are getting big,” Atorino says. “They seem to be somewhere between 50 cents and a buck and escalating from there. CBS is in strong shape. They’re going to push the envelope on the ask.”

With the contract to air the NFL’s AFC package through 2021 and as the recent winner of the NFL Thursday Night Football contract for eight early-season games, a deal valued at $250 million according to Sports Business Daily, CBS has considerable leverage.

“CBS is behind Fox and other nets with regards to affiliation agreements,” one source notes. “They feel that as the No. 1 network, they should be getting a premium. Eighty to 90 cents per household wouldn’t surprise me. But it seems like a fairly aggressive ask.”

CBS is seeking reverse comp payments based on a television household basis, versus per pay subscriber, is standard operating procedure for the network, according to one source.

It’s also a strategy to protect the network as emerging distribution platforms, namely the Internet, alter the economics of television. If affiliates begin distributing their signals locally via the Internet, CBS would get paid just as it does for distribution over cable and satellite.

Broadcasters are just beginning to figure out how to navigate the emerging distribution platforms to their advantage, says Atorino. “For a long time, cable had the game all to themselves and they’ve taken a lot of money out of the marketplace.”

Atorino, doesn’t perceive the push for more reverse comp as a threat to the network-affiliate model, nor does he consider CBS’s ask out of line.

“This is not a big deal,” he says. “Fragmentation of viewing is creating different piles of viewers and guys with content want to get paid by the guys using their stuff.”

While CBS’s costly NFL rights contracts may increase pressure for reverse comp, they also help to undergird the network-affiliate partnership.

“The Sunday NFL agreement is through 2021,” says a source. “That contract, as with all other broadcast networks that have football, requires an over-the-air broadcast of those games. They can’t go over the top, they don’t have the rights for that. The NFL is very particular about making sure they can deliver to the greatest common denominator out there.

“The networks have to remember that there is no network without affiliates. We are the linchpin for launching shows that they, because they have own studios, can sell domestically and internationally for a boatload of money. That’s done on the backs of broadcasters.”


Comments (13)

Leave a Reply

kendra campbell says:

April 17, 2014 at 9:43 am

Pigs eventually get slaughtered.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    April 19, 2014 at 4:54 pm

    So that’s what happened to you, you got slaughtered?

Joe Jaime says:

April 17, 2014 at 9:44 am

Even at .50 a sub that’s a big jump in one year..perhaps something scaled over 10 years would be easier to absorb.

Kristine Melser says:

April 17, 2014 at 10:33 am

Ha! This is funny because WKYT in Lexington and WVLT in Knoxville are probably on the CBS network radar, those affiliates are making bank with UK basketball and UT Football, the SEC football ratings in Knoxville are nice for non UT games. Les wants his share! Don’t worry Gray, they are probably going after most of their SE affiliates since the football ratings are up. Buyer be aware for that CBS affiliate up for sale in Birmingham!

Mike Long says:

April 17, 2014 at 11:04 am

CBS affiliates will get $2+ per sub, especially when Cable pays ESPN $5+, and the regional Fox Sports channels, $4+. CBS content is far stronger. Gray will do well because they will be on the ground floor and cut the best deal, all others after that will pay more. Welcome to the brave new world!

    Terry Dreher says:

    April 17, 2014 at 11:28 am

    Not sure I follow your logic. The CBS affiliates will be paying $.90 for each household to CBS Network. How does that translate to affiliates getting $2+ per sub? Affiliate stations don’t get paid by their parent company (Gray in this case) either. They may get capital from the parent company, but affiliates are never paid by anyone on a per-viewer basis except the advertisers. Gone, far gone, are the days where cable or satellite pays the individual station. That money goes to the Group. ‘jdshaw’ has it right: “Pigs eventually get slaughtered.” People will one day soon say “enough” and turn off the boob tube for good.

    Mike Long says:

    April 17, 2014 at 1:15 pm

    The stations will charge the cable providers $2+ per subscriber for each houshold. They will pay CBS .90, and collect the rest for the value of their local news, local programming and their syndication costs. Whether they pay the group or the station, it does not matter, it is revenue earned. Either the group or the station is going to collect for each household that cable charges their customer. The $2+ figure is not out of line when you look at what a CBS affiliate with strong news does ratings wise compared to a ESPN, Sports Channel, CNN, FoxNews, etc. The affiliate has dominant market share among those cable subscribers who pay for the local package. Stations or groups are not going to give away the gains that they have made already with cable. They are going to pass on the increase (.90) that the networks want and will get because they have the content. Stations deserve and should get the other $1.10+ for the millions they invest in excellent local news sports and weather content, top syndication like Wheel and Jeopardy, and in some cases local sports like high school tournaments. Cable has charged the consumers $0.25 or $0.50 per subscriber for cable channels that nobody watched, as a way to increase programming excluisvely for cable. The dollars will now shift. The cable operators will now shift or cut thos payments away from the marginal channels to pay retrans fees for the big 4 affilates, based on the share of audience that each delivers.

    Terry Dreher says:

    April 17, 2014 at 6:42 pm

    tevee, you’re starting with the premise that individual stations negotiate the per-subscriber charge with cable/satellite companies. This isn’t the case and will not be in the foreseeable future. Station Groups negotiate the price with cable. Having said that, comparing a traditional network affiliate to a cable-only channel isn’t a good comparison. ESPN is part of the Disney empire. ESPN doesn’t negotiate directly with cable, Disney does that. And it’s Disney that gets the $5.00+ per subscriber whether the cable customer want’s ESPN or not. ESPN doesn’t then go to the cable company and expect an additional fee for carriage. CBS more than CBS network it’s also CBS News, CBS Sports, Showtime, CBS Studios, CBS Distribution, etc, – another empire if you will. CBS already charges the cable and satellite companies a fee for all entities CBS (minus the affiliates), and now they want another fee from every CBS affiliate for every household the affiliate potentially reaches – even in areas where they are not on cable nor available over-the-air in rural cases. The CBS affiliate can not separately charge the cable company to recoup what CBS is demanding from them, because the cable company will not negotiate with affiliates directly. Plus, how would the affiliate charge the non-cable viewers in order to pay the money to the network?

Tim Pardis says:

April 17, 2014 at 1:21 pm

Sports and entertainment companies raise their prices on the broadcast and cable companies who, in turn, raise their prices on the subscribers. But, because the subscribers rate of compensation is not rising as fast as programming costs, more and more people will be forced to cut the cord. This is a zero sum game.

Rachel Martin says:

April 17, 2014 at 1:47 pm

Many stations groups have agreements with Cable/ADS systems. What CBS wants is rough. It is true based on what ESPN gets ($5.50 per sub), CBS is easily worth $20.00 per sub, but the only $2.00 per sub deals everyone is talking about was the O&O’s. Broadcast affiliate groups don’t get rates that high on the food chain. And CBS asking for rates based on Households…really. 15%-20% of households are over the air ONLY homes. They want stations to pay CBS for those homes…when the stations can’t get paid?
And what about the program fees that stations already pay for…NFL…
We are 5-years away from all of the Networks blowing up their affiliates and taking 100% of the retrans money and going without over the air!

alicia farmer says:

April 17, 2014 at 1:55 pm

The broken model is now at a tipping point. Subscribers have taken enough abuse. OTA/broadbandRokuNetflix,etc. is the future – and it is here.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    April 18, 2014 at 3:15 pm

    This and other posts that show your defeated attitidue explain why you are a FORMERgm instead of a CURRENTgm.

Joanne McDonald says:

April 17, 2014 at 2:36 pm

Gray’s idea with CBS likely will harm broadcasters such as Brian W Brady and likely would end seeing him selling KSWT (NBC KYMA being including) and KVTV to other broadcasters like Nexstar with Nexstar could be a target for KZTV and Mark Nalbone could end up possibly selling KGWC/KGWL/KGWR in Casper to Gray to connected it with NBC affiliate KCWY in Casper and KGWN in Cheyenne due to Gray ownership of KCWY and KGWN and Gray has the resources when it comes to CBS wanting 50 cents. Gray has actually done the best job with CBS stations than Brian W Brady, Mark Nalbone, Sagamore Hill, and other bad broadcasters combined while Nexstar and Sinclair wouldn’t have problems with CBS due to them operating large number of stations with CBS. Brian W Brady is responsible for wanting FOX affiliates to pay 25 cents per subscribers the first year to 50 cents the fourth year with the possibly for him selling his Northwest/Stainless stations to possibly Sinclair in the future mainly as consolidation and virtual duopoly bait.