RETRANS

FCC Asked To Change Retrans Blackout Rule

Cable operator Mediacom Communications files a rulemaking petition at the FCC that would ban stations from pulling their signals from MVPDs after expiration of a retrans license if the stations isn't available over the air or by streaming to 90% of its market.

Cable operator Mediacom Communications wants the FCC to change its rules to condition a television station’s license renewal on the station’s agreeing to not terminate an MVPD’s carriage of the station’s signal upon the expiration of a retransmission consent agreement if the station is not accessible via over-the-air reception or Internet streaming to at least 90% percent of the homes in its local market served by the MVPD.

In a petition for rulemaking filed at the FCC today, Mediacom says that while “broadcast lobbyists contend that free over-the-air television service is universally available, many broadcast stations do not transmit a viewable signal to significant portions of their local markets and, for the past few decades, the broadcast industry has done exceedingly little to expand the free availability of local television stations to in-market viewers.

“Moreover, the unfortunate reality is that broadcasters currently have no incentive to increase the number of viewers receiving free local television service.

“As a result, the broadcast industry’s commitment to free over-the-air service is dying, and television viewers all over the country have become subject to retransmission consent-fueled increases in the price of pay TV service or service disruptions that result from retransmission consent impasses. These price increases and service disruptions hit hardest those viewers retransmission consent was supposed to protect — those that cannot receive local broadcast signals without MVPD service.

“The public interest would be well-served by the adoption of rules that create incentives for local broadcasters to extend free access to their signals.”

The petition also says that in order to “minimize the risk that the proposed rule will encourage retransmission consent negotiating impasses, it would not apply if the MVPD has terminated active negotiations with the broadcaster, as defined by the commission.”

BRAND CONNECTIONS

In a separate letter to FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, Mediacom CEO Rocco Commisso decried what he called broadcasters’ plan to continue to use station blackouts as the primary tool for forcing retransmission consent fees from today’s $6 billion per year level to upwards of $29 billion annually. He expressed his disappointment with the chairman’s policy of not meeting with parties to an ongoing retransmission consent dispute, “the very time when consumers most need your help.”

The petition added: “Simply put, viewers residing in a station’s local market do not benefit from locally-oriented broadcast programming when they cannot view it because they have no free access to the station’s signal and either cannot afford to receive the station via a pay TV service or are blocked from receiving it from their chosen pay TV service due to a retransmission consent shutdown. Even though it may be possible for viewers suffering due to a blackout during a negotiating impasse to switch providers, it is neither cheap nor easy to do so.”

And, Mediacom added, “Even viewers who have free access to broadcast service but nonetheless receive broadcast signals as part of their MVPD service will benefit from the moderating effect that the proposed rule will have on out-of-control retransmission consent fee increases and on the use of shutdowns to force MVPDs (and their customers) to accept such increases.”

The full text of Commisso’s letter to Wheeler and Mediacom’s petition for rulemaking can be found here.


Comments (10)

Leave a Reply

Gene Johnson says:

July 7, 2015 at 2:19 pm

Ridiculous allegation that “out-of-control” increases in retransmit fees have a substantial impact on the consumer. Comcast is my MVPD and it breaks out the “broadcast fees” on my invoice each month. It’s about $3.50. While such fees will no doubt increase in the future, the amount of the monthly fee a subscriber pays for broadcast signals is a tiny percentage of the total cost the MVPD charges. I wonder if Mediacom in its petition stated what percentage of its customer charges is due to retransmission consent fees.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    July 7, 2015 at 3:36 pm

    Furthermore, your package price was not reduced by $3.50 when the “broadcast fees” breakout was implemented, so the increase went towards the programming costs of the other “non-broadcast” channels, while trying to hide where the real increase went.

    Keith ONeal says:

    July 7, 2015 at 11:24 pm

    @JamesV: Bright House is my MVPD and the Broadcast Fee is $2.00 a month.

Brian Bussey says:

July 7, 2015 at 3:48 pm

I care for a parent in a assisted living facility and have been acutely aware of the strength of broadcast signals since the conversion to digital from analog broadcast signals. HUGE SWATHS of DMAs are not receiving local broadcast signals as a result of digital broadcasting. Now the phone companies are trying to take ( spectrum auction) the frequencies that can pass through walls. The stations talk like they care but between unlimited political and retrains money, they can almost air color bars and make money…. This is what happens when broadcasters have to report to bean counters and not the other way around…

    Michelle Underwood says:

    July 7, 2015 at 4:09 pm

    On what parallel universe do you live, with unlimited political and retrains money???

Dante Betteo says:

July 7, 2015 at 4:06 pm

I get 54 OTA channels in the Cincy / Dayton area. Don’t mess with it.

Evan Ortynsky says:

July 7, 2015 at 5:46 pm

As a broadcaster in a smaller market, I can tell you that the Network fee’s just keep climbing. The viewer demand better and better shows, which include more expensive to make shows. Look at Marvel Agents of Shield. That TV show probably costs more per episode that an entire season of shows 5-10 years ago. Big bang every main character gets a million $ per episode. So the networks need more money than what they can get from just ad sales so they have increased the cost to the local affiliate over the years. The affiliate cannot pay that and make it,unless they get money from the MVPD for the use of that channel. Cable/Satellite have to pay similar amounts for things like ESPN, but the # of viewers that want the local channels is far above the everyday cable TV channel due to better programming. The blackout is part of the bargaining tool. When we were dropped by one MVPD as they did not want to pay, their subscribers cried foul and they were calling us back within a few days agreeing to our terms…

Brad Dann says:

July 7, 2015 at 7:17 pm

Rocco runs a company that consistently finishes LAST in Customer Service scores among Cable Companies, doesn’t invest in the system (I’ve had to replace my cable modem 4 times in less than two years) and is losing video subs by the boat load (it’s markets were the first to have DBS subs surpass Cable subs) and it’s all the broadcasters fault! What a joke and if he were overbuilt, they’d go out of business.