FCC: Repack Won’t Force Stations Off Air

If meeting the 39-month deadline to repack spectrum following next year's auction becomes a problem, Chairman Tom Wheeler said today, the FCC will "work it out" with the broadcasters. "This is not a drop-off-the-edge-of-the-table situation.... I totally agree on the importance of local community broadcasting and why it has to remain after the auction."

Under questioning at a congressional oversight hearing today, all five FCC commissioners vowed they would not force any broadcaster off the air for failing to meet the 39-month deadline for moving to new channels after next year’s incentive auction.

If meeting the deadline becomes a problem, Chairman Tom Wheeler said, the FCC will “work it out” with the broadcasters. “This is not a drop-off-the-edge-of-the-table situation…. I totally agree on the importance of local community broadcasting and why it has to remain after the auction.”

Concern about the deadline is growing. Last week, a study commissioned by the NAB concluded that the so-called repacking of the TV band could take anywhere from eight to 11 years, given current estimates of how many stations will have to be moved, and the limited RF equipment and services available to accomplish that task.

The commissioners appeared before the House Communications and Technology Subcommittee. The repacking deadline was brought up twice — first by Doris Matsui (D-Calif.) and then by Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.).

“I know how critical it is to get spectrum into the market,” said Matsui. “But we need to make sure this transition doesn’t leave TV viewers in the dark.”

Kinzinger also asked what would happen if the $1.75 billion that Congress set aside for reimbursing broadcasters for moving to new channels proved insufficient.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

Wheeler stopped short of saying the FCC would ask for more money. But, he said, the FCC may come back to Congress and say: “Hey, there were some judgment calls here that didn’t work out.”

He also said that he did not feel comfortable, in the case of a shortfall, giving some broadcasters more money than others.

“I don’t want to get in a situation where you are picking and choosing. That’s not the job of this agency. I do want to be in the situation of adhering to the law, which is 1.75.”

Wheeler also noted that the NAB originally told the FCC that the repack should take only 30 months.

In a statement following the hearing, NAB spokesman Dennis Wharton said that in January 2013 it told the FCC that the repack would take at least 30 months, assuming that only 400-500 stations would have be repacked.

“Since that time, three things have happened,” Wharton said. “First, the FCC has released repacking simulations suggesting that well over 1,000 stations (more than twice as many as anyone anticipated) could need to move. Second, the FCC adopted a hard deadline for all stations to move, which surprisingly would force them off the air regardless of circumstances. Third, NAB undertook a study earlier this year — the first of its kind — that analyzed how long it would take to conduct a nationwide repack.”

Wheeler also confirmed that he would not be moving ahead immediately with redefining online video distributors as cable and satellite operators or with eliminating the network and syndication exclusivity rules. He said he would fold the latter into the retransmission consent reform proceeding. “That’s the appropriate place to address it.”


Comments (17)

Leave a Reply

Gregg Palermo says:

November 17, 2015 at 3:55 pm

And by “off the air” we assume you mean broadcast signals that hardly anybody uses anymore to receive TV channels. Good Lord, it’s 2015, almost 2016, and everyone is on cable or on satellite or on the Internet. I haven’t seen a rooftop antenna in 30 years! What tiny sliver of homes watches over the air anymore??! Most estimates put it at no more than 10 percent of homes, which is a waste of precious spectrum!

    Joel Ordesky says:

    November 17, 2015 at 4:14 pm

    OTA viewers and cord cutters are growing in number every day. I am one of them and can easily afford cable or satellite. I just don’t want it. The major network stations are just fine with me, thank you, and I get plenty of other content with my Roku.

    Tanya Pavluchuk says:

    November 17, 2015 at 5:25 pm

    Many people hide their antennas in their houses or attics……

    Dante Betteo says:

    November 17, 2015 at 5:56 pm

    Rust Belt, I use over the air TV and I get 60 channels between the Dayton and Cincinnati market. My antenna is outside on top of my directional FM antenna. So I guess with you understanding, I don’t count.

    Ellen Samrock says:

    November 17, 2015 at 6:06 pm

    According to yesterday’s article about Indiana University’s public television station, WTIU, it said that 18 percent of their viewers watch the station over the air. That seems to be on par with the national average as well. The 10% figure was debunked as nonsense not long after the NBP was published.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    November 17, 2015 at 9:51 pm

    The 2012 Research that said 18% is down to 14% in the 2015 edition, meaning if you believe their research, there is a 25% decline in OTA Viewers 2012-2015. If you don’t believe that, then you cannot pick and chose portions of their research.

    Blair Faulstich says:

    November 19, 2015 at 11:56 am

    Rustbelt: The fact is that OTA is growing daily, Millennials are using Netflix, Hulu, etc., in combination with OTA. You don”t have to have an outdoor antenna. What a buffoon.

    james abels says:

    November 19, 2015 at 3:40 pm

    What would you like to waste the spectrum on? It seems to be the entities that will pay for it, and make us pay for it in the end, now matter what is done with the spectrum after the auction.

charles spencer says:

November 17, 2015 at 3:59 pm

Not only have you not been past my house to see my antenna or my neighbors’, you also have not been by the cable headends that use over-the-air to receive our signals and redistribute them.

Liz Sidoti and Bob Lewis says:

November 17, 2015 at 4:06 pm

How arrogant! There are families who cannot afford cable or satellite. You would just consign them to second-class video homes without OTA broadcasters. Your 10 percent figure is also low. You must have no heart or are a stooge for the cable industry. Also, believe me that members of Congress who need those homes depending solely on OTA broadcasters will fight to defend them as well as their local broadcasters. The facts seem irrelevant to you and your numbskull perceptions.

Joli Francis says:

November 17, 2015 at 4:08 pm

Don’t know what estimates you’re thinking of but judging by the many cord cutters seeking antenna advice from us, the rooftop antennas I see all around our markets, and the number of antenna installs that our local antenna retailers have done, the OTA number is every bit of the NAB’s 17 percent finding.

Paul Fiddick says:

November 17, 2015 at 4:18 pm

Unfortunately for RustbeltAlumnus2, the facts simply point in the other direction. Take the thousands of people who stood in line for hours for a free antenna during Antennas Direct’s recent five-city Broadcast TV Liberation Tour: http://www.antennasdirect.com/blog/. Even in DC people want over-the-air TV through an antenna. At an antenna giveaway in Eastern Market last year, 1,000 antennas were given away in less than an hour: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9f9-SBYnM0.

Brett Zongker says:

November 17, 2015 at 4:19 pm

Just for the record, Nielsen says 1.6 million people moved from pay TV to over the air in the last 2 years.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    November 17, 2015 at 5:49 pm

    Well, consider that Nielsen also shows the total number of TV Households down 1.9 million over the last 2 years. So did these people move from pay TV to OTA? Or did the number of Households just decrease – as that number should not decrease if they dropped Pay TV and went to OTA. Instead it appears that Millennials simply moved home and Households decreased.

ABELARDO BLANCO says:

November 17, 2015 at 4:36 pm

and if you believe anything Wheeler and the FCC say, have I got a deal for you on beachfront property in the Mojave desert…

Cheryl Daly says:

November 17, 2015 at 8:36 pm

Indoor antennas – like the one that I have and that my neighbor has – aren’t visible from the street. But I’d have to admit that the internet offers more program choices than over-the-air offers, albeit at a price.