It suggests changes the FCC should consider to make it less repetitive and burdensome for broadcasters and to insure that stations are not forced to reduce service indefinitely during repacking.
It suggests changes the FCC should consider to make it less repetitive and burdensome for broadcasters and to insure that stations are not forced to reduce service indefinitely during repacking.
NAB says the FCC should change its auction repack progress form to remove any suggestion that broadcasters can or should be forced to operate on backup facilities that do not allow it to maintain coverage for an indefinite period of time.
The suggestion came in comments on the FCC’s proposed form for the reports broadcasters involved in the repack following the incentive auction will be required to file.
NAB agrees that such a form is necessary for an undertaking of the size and scope of the repack to succeed. “Regular progress reports will provide critical information to the commission as it manages an incredibly complex transition.”
However, it spelled out four specific points that the FCC should modify:
NAB’s comments also said: “We urge the commission to adjust the proposed reporting requirement to make it less repetitive and burdensome for broadcasters, and to incorporate more flexible options for responding to the proposed questions.”
“Most importantly, the commission must not seek to compel broadcasters to operate with significantly diminished facilities solely to maintain the fiction that its arbitrary 39-month deadline for the completion of repacking is achievable.”
Comments (2)
Ellen Samrock says:
January 26, 2017 at 5:45 pm
Here’s a big repack caveat the Micro-App-Goog crowd didn’t count on: Ajit Pai. He said this at the Brandery
“A Digital Empowerment Agenda” Cincinnati, OH, Sept.13, 2016: “”When it comes to the broadcast television band, broadcasters should have priority.” Pai also said that, “…low-power TV stations and TV translators who provide valuable service across the country will need a home after the auction.” Translation: Obama’s high tech cronies are going to have to “Go Fish” in some markets when it comes to helping themselves to that free 14 MHz slice of vacant channel spectrum. It won’t be there.
Wagner Pereira says:
January 27, 2017 at 2:50 am
“Who provide valuable service”. That’s a short list