OPEN MIKE BY MARTIN FRANKS

On Retrans’ Anniversary, Remembering The Key Roles Of Larry Tisch And Jay Kriegel

The long-serving CBS executive says that while many in the business played a role 30 years ago in creating retransmission consent — long an invaluable revenue stream for TV stations — the contributions of those two CBS executives are often overlooked.

This  marks the 30th anniversary of Congress’s sole veto override of President George H. W. Bush’s presidency, the 1992 Cable Act, which included retransmission consent.

Many people deserve a share of the credit for that incredible achievement:

  • Eddie Fritts, Jim May, Gary Chapman, Jack Goodman and their colleagues at the NAB.
  • Local television broadcasters across the country who were central to the lobbying effort.
  • The late Sen. Daniel Inouye, former Reps. Jack Fields and Dennis Eckart and their staffs.

But two people are often overlooked for their central roles in procuring retrans, which has become a mainstay of the financial viability of television broadcasters: CBS’s Larry Tisch and Jay Kriegel.

More often than not, sometimes unfairly, Tisch is vilified for other actions during his tenure as CEO of CBS, but very early on, he zeroed in on the gross inequity of cable operators getting their most popular programming without having to compensate the sources of that programming, broadcast television. In the late 1980s, with the benefit of new eyes on the broadcast business model, Tisch began looking into how that inequity might be addressed.

His closest aide over the course of many years, even before CBS, was the irrepressible Kriegel. Responding to Larry’s concerns, Kriegel sought the opinion of some key network affiliate broadcast veterans at, among others, Belo, Nationwide and GroupW who agreed that the industry’s then principal effort to secure must carry needed to be superseded by seeking compensation from cable operators.

Out of those conversations came retransmission consent, and thanks to cable’s successful opposition to must carry, broadcasters moved forward to the retrans effort instead.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

At first, Tisch and Kriegel were sometimes ridiculed for their early advocacy of retrans. Cap Cities ABC did not want to jeopardize its cable relationships. Fox wanted to go after the cable compulsory license instead. Only NBC CEO Bob Wright and his network showed initial interest. NAB and leading independent broadcasters were still pursuing the last straws of must carry.

But Tisch and Kriegel persisted. Tisch made countless trips to Washington to educate lawmakers on the illogical business equation between broadcasters and cable operators. Given his position at CBS, to say nothing of his national stature as one of the nation’s most astute investors, he had access to almost every senator and congressman, and he used it.

Ironically, as he tried to make the case for retrans, many of the legislators wanted, instead, his views on the economy and markets, but he worked hard to return the conversations to retrans.

As for Kriegel, he worked ceaselessly in front of and behind the scenes to rally anyone with a stake to the cause. As one who regularly felt his unrelenting pressure to move the issue forward, it was the lobbying equivalent of trying to sip from a fire hose.

And just as important, and no doubt surprising to some, Tisch issued a rare blank check for the effort.

After initial, successful passage in both the House and Senate, the Bush veto was overridden by just one vote in the Senate when Sen. Bob Kasten (R-Wis.), whom Minority Leader Bob Dole thought would be absent, slipped back into D.C. (on a plane owned by an anonymous broadcaster) to cast the deciding vote. Even then, Vice President Dan Quayle tried to abscond with the paperwork which might have resulted in a Bush pocket veto. But staffers for Majority Leader George Mitchell sniffed out the plot and effected the necessary procedural steps to make the veto override stick.

For its leadership advocating retransmission consent, CBS was singled out by the major cable operators for retribution when retrans negotiations began in 1993. Another decade would pass before meaningful compensation would begin to flow, but it would have never happened without Tisch and Kriegel. The industry owes them enduring gratitude.


Marty Franks retired from CBS in 2013 after 25 years in executive posts there. He helped win passage of retrans when head of CBS’s Washington office, and later negotiated CBS’s retrans deals until his retirement.


Comments (5)

Leave a Reply

tvn-member-3628948 says:

October 5, 2022 at 11:34 am

According to Congress.gov., the Senate veto override vote of the 1992 Cable Act was 74-25, meaning it is incorrect to say “the Bush veto was overridden by just one vote in the Senate.” The two-thirds veto override requirement is a 67-vote minimum in the Senate.

10/05/1992 Senate Passed Senate over veto by Yea-Nay Vote. 74-25. Record Vote No: 264.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/102nd-congress/senate-bill/12/all-actions?overview=closed&q=%7B%22roll-call-vote%22%3A%22all%22%7D

Dennis Wharton says:

October 5, 2022 at 2:23 pm

Marty is correct. It was one vote that preserved the veto override. Republican Leader Bob Dole allowed a handful of Republicans to switch their vote to override the veto after it became apparent the GOP lacked the critical final vote to sustain the Bush veto. (Remember, this was an election year, and many Republicans were worried that a “pro-cable” vote would have been perceived — rightfully so — as anti-consumer.)
A great day for NAB, and another clear and convincing victory for broadcasters.
And Marty Franks himself deserved a HUGE amount of credit for his role in this victory for broadcasters.

metrojoe says:

October 5, 2022 at 3:44 pm

That one vote was Senator Thad Cochran (R) Mississippi after Senator Trent Lott (R) Mississippi voted with the cable industry. MS TV stations went in mass to lobby knowing we had to have on or the other to vote with the broadcasters. Later Senator Trent Lott lost his Senate Majority Whip position.

tvn-member-3628948 says:

October 5, 2022 at 4:16 pm

I’m having trouble believing or understanding the VP Dan Quayle anecdote when there is nothing in the US Constitution that provides for a pocket veto of a bill that has become law via successful two-thirds override votes in the House and Senate.

When S.12 passed the Senate 74-25 on Oct. 5, 1992 via a veto override, it’s my understanding that the 1992 Cable Act became law at that moment and could not be blocked by a pocket veto. The President’s pocket veto refers to a bill that wasn’t returned to the House or Senate. It does not refer to legislation that was vetoed and then overridden by the House and Senate,

tvn-member-3628948 says:

October 5, 2022 at 4:20 pm

Reply to Dennis Wharton. Thanks for the update. I’m going to see if Congress.gov will add your comment as footnote to the official record.

“Marty is correct. It was one vote that preserved the veto override. Republican Leader Bob Dole allowed a handful of Republicans to switch their vote to override the veto after it became apparent the GOP lacked the critical final vote to sustain the Bush veto. (Remember, this was an election year, and many Republicans were worried that a “pro-cable” vote would have been perceived — rightfully so — as anti-consumer.)
A great day for NAB, and another clear and convincing victory for broadcasters.
And Marty Franks himself deserved a HUGE amount of credit for his role in this victory for broadcasters.”