A Broadcaster’s Guide To Washington Issues

TVNewsCheck's quarterly quick briefing on the legal and regulatory proceedings affecting broadcasters from communications attorneys David Oxenford and David O'Connor.

As we look ahead to 2018, we can reflect on the significant number of deregulatory efforts adopted by the FCC in 2017. From the elimination of main studio requirements to relaxed EEO requirements and the streamlining of public inspection file obligations, broadcasters can point to concrete examples of regulatory relief, with more promised in 2018.

Meanwhile, broadcasters have commenced their repacking efforts in earnest, with the FCC ramping up its reimbursement process even while questions remain about whether sufficient funding is in place to cover all costs of the repacking. Broadcasters also must consider the impact of the FCC’s decision to adopt ATSC 3.0 as a new voluntary transmission standard, and how that adoption fits in with their repacking plans.

Keep up to date with these and other legal and policy issues affecting television broadcasters by reading FCC Watch, TVNewsCheck’s exclusive briefing on some of the major issues currently being considered in Washington prepared by David Oxenford and David O’Connor, attorneys in the Washington law offices of Wilkinson Barker Knauer LLP. You can reach Oxenford at [email protected] or 202-383-3337 and O’Connor at [email protected] or 202-383-3429.

In alphabetical order:

ATSC 3.0

On Nov. 16, 2017, the FCC voted 3-2 along party lines to adopt new rules authorizing TV stations to use the ATSC 3.0 standard on a voluntary, market-driven basis. This decision was the culmination of years of efforts to introduce this new standard, aka Next Generation TV. The ATSC 3.0 standard was developed by the Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC).


The new standard incorporates Internet-protocol digital encoding and allows for many other major advances, including 4K capabilities, high-efficiency video coding, enhanced compression and significant improvements for both mobile reception and data transmission.

The FCC’s decision incorporates only a portion of the new standard into its rules — specifically, it incorporated two parts of the ATSC 3.0 “physical layer” standard into the rules: (1) the ATSC A/321:2016 “System Discovery & Signaling” (A/321), which is the standard used to communicate the RF signal type that the ATSC 3.0 signal will use, and (2) the A/322:2017 “Physical Layer Protocol” (A/322), which is the standard that defines the waveforms that ATSC 3.0 signals may take.

With respect to A/322, the FCC decided to apply the standard only to a Next Gen TV station’s primary free over-the-air video programming stream and incorporate it by reference into the FCC rules for a period of five years.

The 3.0 standard is an alternative to, but not a replacement for, the current ATSC 1.0 DTV transmission standard. Stations are not required to transition to the new standard. The FCC also declined to mandate that TV manufacturers include a 3.0 tuner in television sets, in keeping with the voluntary nature of this new standard.

Stations choosing to operate using the 3.0 standard will be required to simulcast the primary video programming stream of their 3.0 channels in a 1.0 format, so that viewers will continue to receive 1.0 service.

Stations can comply with this requirement by partnering with another station (i.e., a temporary “host” station) in their local market to either:

  • Air a 3.0 channel at the temporary host’s facility, while using their original facility to continue to provide a 1.0 simulcast channel, or
  • Air a 1.0 simulcast channel at the temporary host’s facility, while converting their original facility to provide a 3.0 channel.

For an initial period of five years, the programming aired on the 1.0 simulcast channel must be “substantially similar” to the programming aired on the 3.0 channel. LPTV and TV translator stations are exempt from the local simulcasting requirement.


A full-power 3.0 signal will not have mandatory carriage rights while the FCC requires local simulcasting. MVPDs will be required to continue to carry 1.0 signals under the must carry rules. The FCC has left it to the marketplace to determine the carriage of 3.0 signals pursuant to retransmission consent agreements.

A number of other conditions and restrictions apply, so stations that are considering the incorporate of 3.0 should review the FCC’s decision carefully. The FCC decision has not yet been published in the Federal Register, so its effective date is not yet set.  

In a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the FCC seeks further comment on three topics:

  • Exceptions to and waivers of the local simulcasting requirement.
  • Whether to allow full power broadcasters to use vacant TV channels to facilitate the transition to 3.0.
  • The FCC’s tentative conclusion that local simulcasting should not change the “significantly viewed” status of a 3.0 station.

Comments are due Feb. 20, and reply comments are due by March 20. See our article here for more on this Further Notice.

Experimental tests of the new system continue around the country, as the remaining aspects of 3.0 are moved to final standards. Many stations are hopeful that they will be permitted to incorporate the 3.0 standard as part of any repacking they need to do as a result of the incentive auction.

Auxiliary Facilities 

In February 2015, the FCC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to eliminate outdated rules in order to promote the conversion of analog remote pickup facilities to digital. The NPRM is available here. The pleading cycle in this proceeding closed in 2015.

CALM Act/Loud Commercials

In 2011, Congress enacted the CALM Act with the aim of ending loud commercials on TV, and the FCC’s rules implementing the CALM Act went into effect in 2012. To comply, TV stations must use equipment that adheres to the A/85:2013 standards adopted by the Advanced Television Standards Committee (ATSC), a standard that has been in place since June 2015. See our summary of CALM Act requirements here and here.

The FCC has previously indicated that it is monitoring complaints related to loud commercials, and suggested that if a particular station receives a sufficient number of complaints, the FCC will issue a Letter of Inquiry regarding the station’s CALM Act compliance. So far, there have been no public actions by the FCC for CALM Act violations. Stay tuned to see if anything changes with the administration’s enforcement of CALM Act issues.

Children’s Programming

The FCC continues to enforce its children’s programming rules. In August 2017, the FCC entered into a consent decree with a TV station that had not been identifying educational and informational programming addressed to children with the on-air “E/I” symbol.

For this and other related violations, the station agreed to make a $17,500 payment to the government, showing that the new administration is still enforcing the rules on its books. See our description of this decision here.

This recent enforcement is similar to past cases under the previous administration where fines were issued for not including the “E/I” symbol on educational and informational programs, and for broadcasting the URL of a commercial website in the body of a program directed to children ages 12 and under. See our summaries of some of these cases here and here.

In the past, fines have also been issued for stations that failed to publicize that educational and informational programming in local program guides. See, e.g., the FCC decision here. TV broadcasters need to carefully observe all aspects of the children’s television rules, as the FCC has been monitoring compliance in this area.

There are numerous other aspects of the children’s television rules to which stations must pay close attention. In July 2015, a station group agreed to pay $90,000 to the federal government and enter into a compliance program in order to resolve claims that the stations were using multiple re-runs of one-time programs to meet their obligations to provide three hours of weekly educational and informational children’s programming.

The FCC asserted that to meet their “core” programming obligation, stations must run regularly scheduled episodes of eligible programs, and not just repeats of one-off programs. See our summary of this case here.

In another 2015 decision, the FCC warned stations to carefully assess the educational and informational aspects of such programs to make sure that there can be no reasonable question as to whether the programs have, as a “significant purpose” the positive development of children’s cognitive and social skills.

The FCC has warned stations about taking too broad an interpretation of “children’s programming,” noting that the FCC “does not automatically accept” a licensee’s claim that its programming adequately meets the standards for children’s programming, but will instead “require the licensee to present credible evidence to support its position in such a situation.” See our summary here.

Throughout the most recent license renewal cycle, the FCC issued significant fines to TV stations for late-filed FCC Form 398 children’s programming reports. In fact, the FCC has been reviewing station’s online public files to more easily locate late-filings. See our article here. Stations need to be diligent in timely filing those reports, and keeping records of when those reports were filed, in preparation for the next round of renewals that will begin in 2020.

In the meantime, some parties have advocated loosening or even eliminating the children’s programming requirements, and for removing the E/I requirement for noncommercial stations. It remains to be seen whether Chairman Pai will take up comprehensive children’s programming reforms.

Closed Captioning

TV Closed Captioning — In 2015, new closed captioning obligations for TV broadcasters became effective. These new “quality” standards for captioning include four distinct areas: Accuracy, synchronicity with the words being captioned, caption completeness from the beginning of a program to its ending, and caption placement so that the caption text does not obscure other important on-screen information.

TV stations are required to use “best efforts” to obtain compliance certifications from their programming providers. For more on the new obligations for quality captioning, see our article here.

In February 2016, the FCC adopted a Second Report and Order which reallocates responsibility for compliance with the closed captioning rules between video programming distributors (VPDs) and video programmers (VPs). The new rules also include methods for measuring closed captioning compliance and responding to consumer complaints. New certifications by VPs to the FCC will also be required.

Although some of these rules took effect in September 2016, most of these new rules will not take effect until they have been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget.

At the same time, the FCC has been restricting the waiver process for closed captioning under the “undue economic burden” standard. That standard is significantly higher than in previous years. The FCC has been reviewing the captioning waivers and issuing public notices soliciting comments. Consumer groups have actively opposed the waiver requests.

The Media Bureau has denied a number of closed captioning waiver requests filed by various churches and other organizations. In doing so, the bureau has conducted a detailed analysis of the financial status of the requesting party, and frequently has concluded that the organization had adequate finances to pay for captioning, and thus a waiver was not warranted. The bureau has also concluded that there are no religious freedom constitutional issues presented by these cases. See our commentary here.

From these cases, it is clear that waivers will be granted only when they would put a burden on the overall financial health of a program producer, and not simply because the cost of captioning would cause the producer to lose money on the program itself.

Top 4 network stations in the top 25 markets have long been prohibited from using the Electronic Newsroom Technique (ENT) to caption their news and other live programming. While other stations can still rely on that technique, the FCC now requires stations to take additional actions with their ENT, including scripting in-studio produced programming, weather information and pre-produced programming (to the extent technically feasible).

Live interviews and breaking news segments need to include crawls or other textual information (to the extent technically feasible). Stations must train news staff on ENT scripting and appoint an “ENT coordinator” accountable for compliance. See this article here for further information.

The FCC required the broadcasting community to submit a report detailing their experiences with the new ENT rules and the extent to which the new ENT rules have been successful in providing full and equal access to live programming on television. The NAB submitted a report on behalf of the TV industry in 2015, and a copy is available here.

IP Captioning — FCC rules require the closed captioning of certain video programming delivered via Internet protocol (i.e., IP video). The rules are a result of the 21st Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act (CVAA), a federal law designed to improve the accessibility of media and communications services and devices.

Under the rules, if programming is delivered using Internet protocol, whether it is prerecorded video programming, live or “near live” programming, it must be provided with closed captions if the programming was shown on television in the United States with captions. However, if the programming aired on TV before certain dates in 2012 and 2013, it may be exempt until it is shown again on TV (the dates will depend on the type of programming — e.g., live programming had a later phase-in date).

TV stations and other video programming distributors (VPDs) are required to make captions available for “archival” IP-delivered video programming within 15 days of the date that an archived program aired on television with captions.

Brief video clips and outtakes (including excerpts of full-length programming) taken directly from captioned TV programming and displayed online must be captioned. In addition, “montages” of multiple clips from captioned TV programs must also be captioned if they are displayed online.

And as of July 2017, clips from live and “near-live” TV programming must also be captioned if they are displayed online. However, such clips may be posted online initially without captions as long as captions are added to clips of live programming within 12 hours, and to clips of “near-live” programming within eight hours, after the conclusion of the television showing of the full-length programming.

The FCC has an open proceeding about how to deal with clips of captioned TV programs that are contained in a “mash-up” with other content that has not been shown on TV with captions. This proceeding also asks whether the grace period provided for live and near-live clips should be phased out over time, and whether the captioning rules should be extended to clips that run on third-party websites or apps. For background, see our summaries here and here.

These requirements govern cable systems, TV stations, broadcast and cable networks and virtually every other professional video program producer who is now, or will be in the future, making programming available online, to the extent that the programming is also exhibited on TV.

For further information, see our blog entry here.


In 2016, new FCC rules became effective which give broadcasters greater flexibility in their disclosure of the material terms of contests which they conduct. Under the new rules, broadcasters may disclose material contest information online in lieu of making on-air announcements, subject to certain requirements. Click here for further information, and click here for our discussion of potential pitfalls when running station contests.

Copyright Infringement Lawsuits for Unauthorized Uses of Internet Photos And Videos

There have been almost daily reports in the broadcast trade press of new lawsuits filed against broadcasters for using photos on their websites and even in their social media accounts without permission of the photographer. In most cases, these photographs were found by station employees on the Internet, and used to illustrate articles on station websites without obtaining permission of the copyright holder.

Similar complaints have been leveled against TV stations for taking Internet photos or video and using them in their on-air programming. Simply because material has been posted on the Internet does not mean that the material is in the public domain and can be reused without permission of the creator. See our articles here, here and here for more information about these issues.

In 2015, the Copyright Office began a proceeding to study how to best protect the rights of photographers and others who produce digital images, while making it possible for users to get the rights to use such photos. See our summary of the initiation of the proceeding here.

A bill was introduced in Congress in August 2016 seeking to establish a copyright small claims court that would allow photographers and others to more easily enforce their rights. See our analysis of that bill here. Congress adjourned without action on these items, but a review of the Copyright Act has been promised in this Congress, so look for these proposals to be considered in the future. See our update here.


The FAA released the final report and recommendations of the UAS Identification and Tracking Aviation Rulemaking Committee in December 2017. The report and recommendations provide the next, although very preliminary, step towards more widespread commercial drone use – especially for drones flown beyond visual-line-of-sight. As the report drew many dissents and did not reach consensus on the scope of applicability of any remote ID and tracking rules, it is unclear how closely the FAA will stick to the group’s ultimate recommendations.

A potential next step is an FAA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, which could address some of the thornier issues left unresolved such as the exact scope of any new rule and protecting the privacy of drone owners and operators, and affirmatively protecting First Amendment newsgathering rights while ensuring public safety interests are met.

In addition to the full plate of legislative issues facing Congress in the new year, the FAA’s authorization and funding will run out on March 31, 2018. The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 remains the most recent long-term authorization/funding law adopted by Congress, with short-term measures adopted in 2016 and again in the fall of 2017 that generally kept the lights on without implementing major changes to the FAA generally or the FAA drone program specifically.

A major sticking point to comprehensive legislation is the potential privatization of Air Traffic Control. That said, comprehensive bills remain pending, and they contain provisions that aim to speed the integration of drones into the national airspace system but also criminalize reckless drone behavior around manned aircraft and runways. For further information about these bills, see here and here.

At the same time, regulation at state, local, and Tribal levels may be entering a new phase through the White House drone pilot program. The pilot program is being administered by the FAA and will select at least five state/local/tribal-private partnerships as participants to test out new ways to integrate drones, promote innovation, ensure public safety, while finding ways to balance national, state, and local interests.

The hope is that the pilot program will provide a vehicle for identifying reasonable state and local regulations that the FAA could approve. Final applications for participation in the pilot program were due Jan. 4 and the FAA will consider those applications on a rolling basis.

EAS — Emergency Information

Broadcasters were required to participate in the nationwide test of the Emergency Alert System (EAS) in September 2017 and to submit the three required forms about their performance by November 2017. On Dec. 7, 2017, the FCC released initial findings from the test, which showed that overall performance appears to have improved from the 2016 test.

This will not be the last nationwide EAS test — in April 2016, the IPAWS Modernization Act (Pub. L. No. 114-143) was enacted which, among other things, requires a nationwide EAS test at least once every three years going forward.

In July 2017, the FCC released a new EAS Operating Handbook, which supersedes all other EAS Handbooks and must be in place in time for the 2017 nationwide EAS test. Copies of the Handbook are available here.

In December 2017, the FCC added a dedicated event code to facilitate the delivery of “Blue Alerts” over the EAS and Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) services. This new BLU event code will be available for state and local officials to notify the public of threats to law enforcement, similar to current Amber Alerts for missing children.

Broadcasters will be required to implement the BLU event code within 12 months of the effective date of the FCC’s decision (which is not yet known as of this writing), while WEA participants have 18 months.

In November 2017, EAS participants were required to provide their State Emergency Communications Committees (SECCs) with information about the ways in which they make EAS information available to non-English speakers, if any. SECCs must now include such information in the State EAS Plans submitted to the FCC for approval.

The FCC specifically declined to mandate multilingual emergency alerts by EAS Participants. In October 2017, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the FCC’s decision not to require multilingual EAS messaging. MMTC recently asked the full DC Circuit to review that decision, and the case remains pending. See our article here for more details on the appeal.

FCC rules require TV stations to ensure that their EAS messages are accessible to members of the public, including those with disabilities. Specifically, EAS messages must appear at the top of the TV screen or elsewhere on the screen where they will not interfere with other visual messages.

In addition, EAS messages must be displayed in a manner that is readily readable and understandable, and in a manner that does not contain overlapping lines of EAS text or extend beyond the viewable display (except for video crawls that intentionally scroll on and off of the screen). Finally, the entire text of the EAS message must be displayed at least once.

Broadcasters must comply with an FCC requirement that emergency information provided in non-news programming be made accessible to individuals who are blind or visually impaired. In doing so, broadcasters must use the secondary audio (or SAP) stream to convey televised emergency information aurally, when such information is conveyed visually during programming other than newscasts (e.g., in an on-screen crawl run during entertainment programming).

This obligation does not cover EAS alerts, but applies to other information about emergency situations that are conveyed by stations over the air in written form (such as crawls). See our summary here for information about these obligations.

The obligation to convert visually-presented emergency information into speech on the SAP channel has been on hold in one instance — where the information is provided graphically, e.g., by broadcasting a weather map or similar non-textual display. In November 2016, the FCC agreed that this requirement will not take effect until this May 26, subject to the filing of an industry status report in November 2017. That status report is available here. See our summary of these issues here.

In January 2016, the FCC adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) soliciting comment on proposed rules to strengthen the EAS. Proposals include improving the utility of state EAS plans, including a requirement that such plans be submitted to the FCC online, whether the current cable “forced tune” and selective EAS override provisions should be retained, and methods to improve state and local usage of EAS. The pleading cycle in this proceeding has closed. For more information on those proposals, click here.

In April 2016, the FCC sought comment on ways to improve earthquake-related emergency alerts, including “Earthquake Early Warnings” to the entire public in fewer than 3 seconds. The FCC was supposed to submit a report on its findings to Congress in September 2016.

The FCC has essentially adopted a strict liability standard for the use of EAS tones (or even EAS tone simulations) in non-emergency situations. In 2015, the FCC fined iHeart Media $1 million over the use of EAS tones in a non-emergency. See our article here. In May 2017, a broadcaster agreed to pay a $55,000 penalty and enter into to a three-year compliance plan with reporting obligations, in connection with a television commercial which incorporated a simulated EAS tone.

For information about other concerns for stations delivering emergency information, see our article here where we talked about these issues in connection with the approach of Hurricane Sandy, and our article here where similar issues were raised in connection with Hurricane Matthew, reminding stations of their obligation to provide visual as well as audio information about imminent threats to assist the hearing-impaired during emergencies.

EEO Rules

In April 2017, the FCC issued a declaratory ruling determining that broadcasters can rely solely on Internet recruitment sources to meet their requirement to widely disseminate information about their job openings. If a broadcaster, in its good faith judgement, determines that an online source will reach members of all of the significant groups in its community, it can rely solely on this online source when seeking candidates for new job openings.

The FCC suggested that stations should still reach out to community groups and educational institutions when recruiting for job openings, and still use its own airwaves for such recruiting. However, these additional outreach efforts are not mandatory if the online source being used reaches members of all significant groups within a broadcaster’s recruitment area. See our summary of the decision here.

While this new ruling significantly lessens the wide dissemination burdens on broadcasters, and is a significant departure from past precedent where stations that relied solely on online sources were fined, other broadcast EEO obligations remain intact. Broadcasters still need to notify specific community groups about job openings if those community groups specifically ask the station to receive such notices, and broadcasters still must conduct non-vacancy specific outreach efforts to educate the community about broadcast employment.

These include the EEO menu options such as attending job fairs, hosting interns, conducting broadcast scholarship programs, and speaking at community groups and educational institutions about what jobs there are at broadcast stations, how to train for them, and how to find them. For more on the remaining obligations, see our article here.

A recent reminder that the FCC is still enforcing its EEO rules came in December 2017, when the Enforcement Bureau announced a $20,000 proposed fine for a broadcaster that apparently failed to sufficiently document its EEO compliance. See our summary here.

Meanwhile, TV broadcasters are obligated to file FCC Form 397 mid-term EEO reports on a rolling basis. This obligation began with stations in Washington, D.C.; Maryland; Virginia; and West Virginia in June 2016, and stations in other states will file as the obligations arise every other month. TV stations with five or more full-time employees will need to file this report by the fourth anniversary of the due date for their last license renewal application. See our summary of this obligation here.

The FCC also continues to enforce its EEO rules by randomly auditing 5% of all broadcast stations annually, as well as through the review of Form 396, which summarizes a station’s EEO performance in the two years prior to the filing of a station’s license renewal filing.

New rounds of random EEO audits were announced in February 2017, focusing on nearly 80 TV stations and more than 200 radio stations, and again in June 2017, targeting nearly 80 radio stations. Read our summary here and here.

In comments filed in its proceeding to modernize media regulation, described in more detail below, a number of parties suggested changes in the current EEO policies. It remains to be seen if the FCC will move further than it already has done in changing these rules.

FCC Commissioners

In October 2017, Chairman Ajit Pai (R) was re-confirmed for another five-year term. Former Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel (D) and former FCC General Counsel Brendan Carr (R) were confirmed by the Senate in August 2017 and are now serving as commissioners. See our article here. Mignon Clyburn (D) and Michael O’Rielly (R) are the other two FCC commissioners. Clyburn’s term technically expired in June 2017, but she can remain a commissioner until the current Congress adjourns at the end of 2018.

FCC Process And Communications Act Reform

With Republicans controlling the White House and both chambers of Congress, we continue to see efforts focusing on FCC deregulation and process reform. Already Congress has passed a number of Congressional Review Act measures overturning rules adopted by the previous administration, including one focused on broadband privacy. Chairman Pai has already adopted a number of process reforms aimed at improving transparency, including the release of draft items before they are voted on at commission meetings. The Chairman is expected to continue these process reform efforts that have been pushed by Republicans in Congress for many years, and to focus on additional deregulatory measures.

Field Office Closures

Following a field office reorganization which closed numerous offices, the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau now indicates that it has three field office “regions.” Region One covers the Northeastern United States. The office is located in Columbia, Md. Region Two covers the Central and Southern United States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The office is located near Atlanta. Region Three covers the Western U.S. including Hawaii and the Pacific island territories with an office in Los Angeles.

The FCC also has offices located in Anchorage, Alaska; Boston, Mass.; Buffalo, N.Y.; Chicago; Dallas; Denver; Detroit; Honolulu; Houston; Kansas City, Mo; Miami; New Orleans; New York; Norfolk, Va.; Philadelphia; Portland, Ore.; San Diego; San Francisco; San Juan, P.R.; Seattle; and Tampa, Fla.

The closure of the San Juan office has created controversy in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria which left the island devastated. Stay tuned for possible efforts by Chairman Ajit Pai to address FCC field offices.

Filing Freeze

On April 5, 2013, the FCC imposed an immediate freeze on most full-power and Class A television modification applications, in connection with the incentive auction. For more on the freeze, see our article here. The FCC temporarily lifted the freeze in late 2017 to permit non-repacked stations to file modification applications, but the freeze is back in place for now.

In June 2015, the FCC also imposed a freeze on the filing of replacement translator applications and displacement applications for Class A, LPTV, and TV translator stations. See our summary here. A new freeze on applications for digital companion channels for LPTV stations was issued in January 2017 (here) to protect opportunities for LPTV stations to seek new channels if they are displaced from their current channel in the repacking following the end of the incentive auction.

In June 2017, the FCC announced that displaced LPTV/TV translator stations will be eligible to file for new channels in a Special Displacement Window, which will most likely open in the first quarter of 2018. On Dec. 21, 2017, the FCC imposed an immediate freeze on the filing of modification applications for LPTV and TV translator stations.

This freeze is intended to stabilize the FCC’s database so that applicants in the upcoming window for the filing of displacement applications by LPTV and TV Translator stations displaced by the incentive auction will have an opportunity to locate new channels on which they can operate. See our summary here.

Foreign Ownership And Investment In Broadcasting

For many years, Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act has been viewed as limiting foreign ownership in a broadcast licensee to 20% of the company’s stock, and no more than 25% of a licensee’s parent company stock. The FCC has taken several steps to emphasize that the 25% limit is not a hard cap on foreign ownership of broadcast stations, but instead is simply a point at which specific FCC approval is needed for additional foreign ownership.

In September 2016, the FCC released an Order extending the same foreign ownership flexibility currently applicable to common carriers, and those rules became effective in April 2017. Under this approach, and with a few broadcaster-specific changes, broadcasters are now able to file petitions for declaratory ruling with the FCC to seek authority:

  • To have up to 100% foreign ownership.
  • For any controlling foreign entity to obtain an additional ownership interest of up to 100% without further FCC approval.
  • For a disclosed, non-controlling foreign interest holder to obtain an additional ownership interest of up to 49.9% without further FCC approval.

In addition, any grant of authority by the FCC pursuant to a Section 310(b)(4) petition filed by a broadcaster automatically will extend to all after-acquired broadcast licenses acquired by the broadcaster. See our summary of the Order here.

Parties seeking to exceed the 25% indirect foreign ownership cap must file a petition for declaratory ruling which details the foreign ownership being proposed. The petition needs to set forth the public interest benefits of the transaction, and demonstrate why the alien ownership would not jeopardize any of the security interests of the United States.

The FCC will allow the public to comment on the petition, and Executive Branch agencies (aka Team Telecom) will be permitted to review the proposal for any national security implications prior to any grant. See our articles here and here for examples.

Even more regulatory relief was granted in the September 2016 Order to U.S. broadcasters that may have incidental foreign ownership. Specifically, the Order requires broadcasters to consider the citizenship of shareholders only if the shareholder is known or reasonably should be known to the broadcaster in the ordinary course of business exercising due diligence.

This approach focuses on only those shareholders that have a reasonable likelihood of influencing the operations of a broadcaster. The FCC will no longer require the use of random shareholder surveys or require broadcasters to assume that unidentifiable shareholders are foreign.

In January 2017, the FCC’s Media Bureau approved up to 49% foreign ownership of Univision. See our summary here. And in February 2017, the FCC approved, for the first time, 100% foreign ownership of a US broadcast station when it allowed an Australian couple to acquire various broadcast licenses in Alaska, Arkansas and Texas. See our article here.

The FCC has additional pending proceedings involving foreign ownership, and recently asked for comments on two such proceedings – one involving a company controlled by Mexican citizens which would go from 25% to 100% foreign ownership and control of a company that owns 2 FM stations in California and Arizona. In the other, an Italian company would acquire a number of radio stations in Florida. See our summary here.

Incentive Auction/Repacking

The incentive auction officially began in March 2016 and officially ended in March 2017, the longest FCC auction in history. Total auction proceeds were about $19.7 billion with 84 MHz of TV spectrum to be cleared.

Most repacked stations filed for construction permits for their new channels by the July 12 deadline, along with their FCC Form 399 cost reimbursements. The combined cost estimates for the repacking for broadcasters and MPVDs was more than $2.13 billion, although that figure has since been reduced by FCC staff to $1.864 billion, which is still above the $1.75 billion that Congress authorized.

Broadcasters and others will now likely look to Congress to cover the shortfall. A bill has been introduced in Congress that would provide additional funding, and would also fund costs incurred by FM stations as a result of the repacking, and potentially LPTV and TV translator repacking costs. See our summary of that proposal here.

As currently scheduled, TV stations have been assigned to one of 10 different transition phases over 39 months, with Phase 1 stations converting to their new channels beginning in September 2018. The 39-month timeline remains controversial, and NAB has filed a petition for reconsideration seeking changes including potential changes in the phase assignments based on the information in the construction permits that were filed in July 2017.

Oppositions to the petition were filed by several wireless companies. We are awaiting word on the FCC’s disposition of the NAB request. Any legislation addressing the financial shortfall could potentially revisit the 39-month timeline as well.

Stations will be required to submit quarterly progress reports throughout the transition — the most recent report was due Jan. 10. Such reports will be available in stations’ online public inspection files.


The FCC continues to enforce its indecency rules. In March 2015, the full commission issued a notice of apparent liability proposing the statutory maximum fine of $325,000 for a television station that “aired graphic and sexually explicit material” during a 3-second video clip on the 6 p.m. newscast.

The licensee argued that the image had not been visible on the monitors in the station’s editing bay, and therefore the station’s management who had reviewed the story did not see the offending material prior to broadcast. The bipartisan nature of this decision suggests that the FCC may not change course on indecency regulation under a Republican-led FCC.

In a news release, the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau chief noted that the FCC’s action sends a clear signal that there are “severe consequences” for broadcasting sexually explicit material when children are likely to be in the audience. More information on this decision is available here.

Meanwhile, a 2013 proceeding on whether to make changes to the FCC’s indecency policies remains pending. In that proceeding, the FCC asked for comments on whether it should continue to apply the hard-line enforcement standard against fleeting expletives that was adopted by the FCC a decade ago, or whether it should go back to the old standard that required a more conscious and sustained use of expletives to warrant FCC action. For a description of some of the issues involved in this proceeding, see our Blog articles here, here, here and here.

It remains to be seen whether Chairman Ajit Pai will act on the open proceeding on fleeting expletives. His only statement on the substance of indecency policy so far was that “the law that is on the books today requires that broadcasters keep it clean so to speak.” 

There was much press coverage earlier this year of a supposed FCC investigation into a remark by Stephen Colbert on The Late Show suggesting that the President had committed a sex act with Vladimir Putin. It appears that this was nothing more than a review of the complaints that were filed about that incident, and the FCC has now terminated its review without further action. See our article on the incident here, and another on the termination of the investigation here.

Nonetheless, indecency enforcement continues, with a New York broadcaster entering into a $10,000 consent decree to resolve indecency allegations in 2017.

Joint Sales Agreements/Shared Services Agreements

In 2014, the FCC decided to make joint sales agreements attributable where one TV broadcaster sells more than 15% of the ad time on another station in its market (meaning that such JSAs are only permissible if the stations can be commonly owned). Under the rule adopted in 2014 (after an initial congressional intervention), existing non-compliant JSAs had to be amended or terminated by Dec. 19, 2015.

However, Congress went further by requiring all JSAs that were in existence prior to March 31, 2014 (the date the FCC voted to restrict them) to be grandfathered until 2025. See our discussion here.

In May 2016, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals threw out the TV JSA attribution rule. See our article here. But on Aug. 24, 2016, as part of its multiple ownership decision, the FCC decided to reinstate the TV JSA attribution rule, but grandfather agreements in existence as of March 31, 2014, and extended the compliance period through Sept. 30, 2025, consistent with congressional mandate.

Until 2025, such grandfathered TV JSAs will not be counted as attributable, and parties will be permitted to transfer or assign these agreements to other parties without terminating the grandfathering relief. New JSAs, however, will only be permitted where the stations engaged in the arrangement can be commonly owned under the TV ownership rules.

In November 2017, the FCC repealed the attribution rules for TV JSAs. That decision will go into effect on Feb. 7, though it is likely to be appealed. See our summary here.

In the same decision, the FCC decided to retain the requirement that parties file shared services agreements with the FCC for review, so that the FCC can better understand what these agreements provide. However, the FCC clarified that these agreements would not require the filing of “ad-hoc” agreements like news sharing of a particular event, or clearly non-broadcast issues like the sharing of the costs of the upkeep of a building or of janitorial services.

But agreements dealing with broadcast operations must be submitted, and will be reviewed by the FCC. The decision stated that the filing was not for purposes of regulation, but instead for purposes of understanding the marketplace. More information is available here.

Meanwhile, the Media Bureau in February 2017 rescinded its 2014 “processing standards” for television acquisitions that included stations involved in any sort of sharing agreement with other local stations, including any form of shared service agreement. These processing standards had the effect of prohibiting certain shared services agreements, even though FCC commissioners themselves had not determined what was permitted and what was forbidden. See our assessment here.

License Renewals

The renewal application cycle for television stations (including LPTV stations, TV translators and Class A stations) ended in 2015, with only the processing of pending applications left for the FCC to complete. The next regular renewal filing deadline for TV stations will not begin until 2020. In that renewal cycle, stations will no longer be required to report on any comments received from the public about violent programming on the station.

In reviewing license renewals, the FCC has focused on issues that have been important in previous cycles, such as public inspection file issues. The failure to timely file FCC Form 398 reports on children’s television programming has been a source of many fines to TV stations during the renewal process. In addition, the online nature of public files now makes it very easy for FCC staff to verify the timeliness (or untimeliness) of station uploads to the public file. See our article here about some of those fines.

While this renewal cycle is essentially over, many of the fines discussed above were based on conduct early in the last renewal cycle. Thus, conduct now can lead to fines in the renewal cycle that will begin in 2020, so do not relax on regulatory compliance merely because the next license renewals seem a long way away.

LPTV Stations And TV Translators

All LPTV stations and TV translators will be required to operate digitally by the end of the repacking process — July 13, 2021 — unless they receive specific extensions or tolling of their construction permit based on unique circumstances. See the FCC’s Public Notice here, and our summary here.

The FCC decided during the incentive auction process that LPTV and TV translator stations, including digital replacement translators (DRTs), will not be protected in the repacking process. However, once primary stations relocating to new channels have submitted construction permit applications and have had an opportunity to request alternate channels or expanded facilities, the Media Bureau will open a Special Displacement Window to offer displaced LPTV, TV translator, and DRT stations an opportunity to select a new channel.

This window seems likely to open sometime in early 2018. See our article here.

In late December 2017, the FCC announced a freeze on the filing of minor change applications by LPTV and TV translator stations. The freeze has been imposed in anticipation of the filing window mentioned above. The specific dates for that window have not been announced yet.

However, the Public Notice indicates that 60 days prior to the opening of the Special Displacement Window, a public notice will be issued to provide data identifying locations and channels where LPTV/translator stations likely cannot propose displacement facilities because of the presence of other non-displaced LPTV/translator stations, full power and Class A television stations, and land mobile operations.

In October 2015, the FCC decided that LPTV operations may continue on new wireless band frequencies until the wireless companies have “commenced operations,” which the FCC defines as the date the wireless company conducts “site commissioning tests.”

In other words, the wireless operator needs to buy and test equipment before it fully starts operations, and once it starts the process through testing on the new spectrum, the LPTV operators need to cease operations. See our article here for further details.

Some newly licensed 600 MHz band wireless operators have announced their intention to commence operations before the window for LPTV/TV translator displacement applications opens early next year.

To assist LPTV facilities that receive “commence operations” notices from these companies before the special filing window is announced, the FCC announced procedures for these LPTV facilities to file for temporary channels on a Special Temporary Authority basis. See our article here.

The FCC also announced that LPTV stations and TV translators can share channels, or can even share channels with full-power stations. Channel sharing with a full-power station would confer some degree of protection against their channel being bumped by future full-power TV facilities changes, as long as the channel sharing arrangement is in place. See our article here.

It remains an open issue whether LPTVs on ch. 6 may continue transmitting, post-digital transition, an analog audio channel so that “Franken FMs” (radio stations received on FM radio receivers on 87.7 MHz that really are the audio portion of the LPTV’s programming). See our summary of the proposals here.

A new freeze on applications for digital companion channels for LPTV stations was issued in January 2017 (here) to protect opportunities for displaced LPTV stations to seek new channels in the special filing window. In June 2014, the FCC announced an immediate freeze on the filing of displacement applications for LPTV and TV translator stations, as well as displacement applications for Class A TV stations. See our summary here. In a Public Notice, the FCC said that these freezes will be lifted at a later date.

In November 2017, the FCC issued an Order and Consent Decree agreeing to end an investigation of an LPTV station licensee that had impermissibly moved rural LPTV facilities to larger, urban area areas. Through a series of minor change applications, the licensee moved stations hundreds of miles from where they were initially granted, to more urban communities where applications could not have been filed.

The FCC required that the licensee pay a penalty of $1.5 million and forfeit about 30 licenses to settle the case, finding that the certification made in the license applications affirming that the stations were constructed in accordance with their construction permits was not accurate given that these stations were not permanently constructed. See our summary here.

Main Studio Rule

In October 2017, the FCC decided to abolish all main studio requirements, including the requirement that a station maintain a minimum staff presence and program origination requirements. The elimination of these requirements was effective as of Jan. 8. See our summary here.

Market Modifications

See Retransmission Consent section below.

Modernizing Media Regulation Inquiry

In May 2017, the FCC initiated a comprehensive review of its broadcasting and MVPD regulations, through its Modernization of Media inquiry. After receiving public comments, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced that he would place at least one Media Modernization item on each monthly open meeting agenda going forward.

True to his word, the FCC has initiated a number of proceedings in recent months to eliminate or modify outdated media regulations, including the proposed elimination of obligations to maintain paper copies of the FCC’s rules; eliminating the requirement to file ancillary/supplementary DTV service reports annually, unless a station actually provided ancillary/supplementary services; modifying local public notice requirements for certain applications; and revising MVPD notifications, including the must carry/retransmission consent election notices sent by broadcasters to MVPDs every three years.

The FCC has proposed to consider other changes at its January 30 meeting — eliminating the requirement that broadcasters submit paper copies of certain licensee contracts, and deleting rules that apply to full-power analog TV stations as such stations no longer exist. See our summary here. Stay tuned for more FCC efforts to eliminate or modify unnecessary regulations.

Over-The-Top Video As A Multichannel Video Programming Distributor (MVPD)

The Aereo case prompted renewed questions about what it means to be an MVPD, and whether the definition of MVPD should include over-the-top (OTT) providers like Hulu and Sling. In 2014, the FCC released a notice of proposed rulemaking to modernize its interpretation of the term “MVPD” to include “services that make available for purchase, by subscribers or customers, multiple linear streams of video programming, regardless of the technology used to distribute the programming.”

The comment cycle in this proceeding has closed, and the matter remains under consideration by the FCC. Click here for more on this item. Resolution of the proceeding stalled in 2016 under then-Chairman Tom Wheeler, according to trade press reports, and whether the new Commission will address it remains unknown.

Copyright issues about OTT systems continue to be litigated in the courts. A 2015 court case in California determined that, under the Copyright Act, OTT providers qualified as “cable systems” that could rely on the statutory license to retransmit the signals of local television stations. See our summary here. However, in December 2015, a District Court in Washington, D.C., reached the opposite conclusion (see our summary here), and in March 2016, another court in Illinois agreed with the DC court’s decision  (see our summary here).

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals then overturned the California decision, concluding in March that Film On X, an Aereo-type service, is not a “cable system” for Copyright Act purposes. See our summary of that decision here.

Following the defeat in the Court of Appeals, FilmOn reached a settlement of its disputes with broadcasters and dismissed all further appeals, so these cases may be over for now. The Copyright Office is looking for comments on its tentative conclusion that the Copyright Act’s definition of a cable system does not include online video services like those of Aereo and FilmOn. Comments in that proceeding are due on March 16, with replies on April 6. See our articles here and here for more information.

Network Nonduplication/Syndicated Exclusivity

See the Retransmission Consent discussion below.

Ownership Limits/Shared Service Agreements

Every four years, the FCC is required by Congress to review and possibly update its broadcast multiple ownership rules. A review initiated in 2009 was ultimately abandoned in 2013. In its place, the FCC announced a new review in 2014.

In May 2016, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia issued an opinion faulting the FCC for not completing any required review of its broadcast ownership rules in 9 years. The court ordered the FCC to meet with certain parties who brought the appeal to finalize a timetable for FCC review of the rules designed to promote minority ownership of broadcast stations.

At the same time, the Court threw out the FCC’s 2014 decision determining that television Joint Sales Agreements were attributable interests. A summary of the court’s decision is available here.

In August 2016, the FCC released a Second Report and Order to complete the review begun in 2014 and respond to the court’s decision. The FCC retained the local TV ownership restrictions, the dual network restriction, and the radio-TV crossownership restrictions. The FCC also decided to adopt a new obligation for commercial TV stations to disclose any shared services agreement by placing a copy of the agreement in their online public inspection file (but the FCC did not make SSAs attributable at this time).

The FCC retained the newspaper-broadcast crossownership prohibition but added a waiver exception for failed and failing broadcast stations and newspapers. Appeals of that decision remain pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

In November 2017, in response to petitions for reconsideration of the August 2016 decision, the FCC took a number of steps to roll back its regulation of media ownership.

Specifically, the FCC:

  • Repealed the newspaper-broadcast crossownership rule.
  • Repealed the radio-television crossownership rule.
  • Eliminated the requirement that at least eight independently-owned television stations remain in the market after ownership of two stations is combined — the “Eight Voices” test.
  • Incorporated a case-by-case review option of the prohibition against common ownership among the top four stations in the market.
  • Repealed the attribution rules for television joint sales agreements (JSAs).
  • Retained the disclosure requirement for shared service agreements (SSAs) involving commercial television stations.
  • Adopted an incubator program to promote new entry and ownership diversity in the broadcast industry.

These revisions are scheduled to go into effect on Feb. 7. However, it is likely that this decision will be appealed, and the entire media ownership proceeding will probably end up back in the Third Circuit, where it essentially has been under review in one form or another for the past 15 years.

In a separate decision, the FCC last year eliminated the so-called “UHF discount” in connection with the national television ownership caps, a decision that has been reversed by the new FCC. See our article here. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit refused to stay the effect of the reinstatement in response to a request by public interest groups, so the reinstatement is now in effect pending the resolution of the appeal by these groups. See the UHF Discount section below.

Ownership Reporting

All commercial and noncommercial broadcasters are required to file a biennial ownership report by March 2. These reports will provide a snapshot of the ownership of broadcasters, accurate as of Oct. 1, 2017. See our summary of this obligation, here.

In April 2017, the FCC adopted an item eliminating the need for individuals being reported on ownership reports to provide their full Social Security Numbers in order to obtain a required FCC Registration Number (FRN). Instead, individuals have the option of obtaining a Restricted Use FRN, with only the last 4 digits of an individual’s Social Security Number, and a date of birth. See our summary here.

The FCC long ago sought comment on whether biennial ownership reporting requirements should include interests, entities and individuals that are not attributable because of:

  • The “single majority shareholder” exemption.
  • The exemption for interests held in eligible entities pursuant to the higher “equity debt plus” threshold.

Reply comments in that proceeding were due in 2013. See our summary here. The FCC announced in 2016 that it would address these issues in a subsequent decision. It remains to be seen whether a Republican FCC will address these issues.

Political Broadcasting

With 2018 shaping up to be a major year for political advertising, stations should brush up on their political broadcasting reporting requirements, particularly since all documentation is available 24/7 in broadcasters’ online public inspection files these days.

While stations do not have an obligation to sell time to candidates for state and local races, once they decide to do so, all other political obligations arise. See our article here for more on this reminder.

For more information on the political broadcasting rules, see our Guide to Political Broadcasting here. In addition, the NAB has released the 18th edition of its Political Broadcast Catechism which answers a number of political advertising questions. While we can’t summarize all of the political advertising rules here, there are a few key concepts, including:

Once you have a legally qualified candidate for federal office, the reasonable access obligations are triggered. Reasonable access requires that broadcasters sell reasonable amounts of commercial airtime, during all classes and dayparts, to federal candidates. While reasonable access only applies to federal candidates, almost all of the other political rules apply to all candidates — including those for state and local offices, once the station decides to make time available for those races.

So, while you don’t have to sell advertising time to candidates for state and local candidates like those running for governor or mayor, once you do, equal opportunities, no censorship and lowest unit charges apply in the same way that they do to federal candidates. See our refresher on reasonable access here.

Stations also need to be careful about on-air employees who decide to run for an elective office, as their on-air appearances will trigger Equal Opportunities rights for their opponents. See our story about a radio sportscaster who decided to run for mayor and the issue that it raised under the political broadcasting rules, here.

In many contentious races, you may see third-party ads from SuperPACs and other non-candidate organizations. These organizations may also be buying ads on other controversial issues before Congress or in local areas, and may raise many of the same issues that are raised when they advertise in political races.

Because third-party advertising does not provide the same liability protections that candidate ads provide, stations need to be concerned with such ads. While stations are generally immune from any liability for statements made in candidate ads, there is potential liability if the station is put on notice of defamatory content or other illegal material in non-candidate ads. See our article about these issues, here.

Such a claim was made to a station by at least one Republican presidential candidate last year. See our article here.

As noted above, candidate ads are covered by the “no censorship” provisions of the Communications Act. Thus, as long as the ad is a “use” by the candidate (i.e., it is sponsored by the candidate’s official campaign committee, and features the candidates “recognizable voice or image,” the spot cannot be rejected based on its content, and the stations cannot (except in very limited circumstances not relevant here) take it down at the request of a complaining opponent.

Numerous requests for take-downs of candidate ads occurred in races across the country in recent elections, so stations need to be aware that they usually cannot honor those requests, even if the broadcaster does not like the content of the candidate’s ad. We wrote more about the no-censorship rule here.

In 2015, the FCC sought public comment on a complaint filed by Canal Partners Media during the 2014 election cycle, in which Canal claimed that two television stations were violating Section 315(b) of the Communications Act, as amended, by prioritizing commercial advertisers over political candidates when making preemption determinations.

Specifically, Canal claimed that the stations’ Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) policy preempted candidates’ advertisements in favor of commercial advertisers purchased earlier in time. Canal’s complaint requested that “if broadcast stations are using LIFO as a method to determine preemption priorities, they must treat political candidates as being the First-In advertiser regardless of when the candidate purchased its airtime in order to be in compliance with Section 315(b) of the [Act].” That proceeding remains pending. See our summary of the issues here.

Separately, the Sunlight Foundation and Campaign Legal Center filed complaints against 11 large market stations alleging that their online political files were incomplete. See our summary of the complaints here. On Jan. 6, 2017, the FCC staff issued two decisions, summarized here, which stated that broadcasters need to assess and include in their public file all of the issues of national importance addressed in political ads, and also need to inquire of issue ad sponsors about the identity of all of their executive officers or members of their board of directors, especially if the sponsoring group list only one person’s name on the disclosure forms submitted to the station.

In February 2017, the Media Bureau, under Chairman Ajit Pai, rescinded the Jan. 6 guidance and decided that such issues need to be addressed by the full commission and not at the Bureau level. See our article here. However, in August 2017, two new complaints raising similar issues were filed at the FCC (see our article here), so these matters may be addressed by the commission in the not too distant future.

Sunlight also filed complaints against two other stations alleging that they did not adequately disclose the true sponsor of PAC ads. The complaints alleged that the sponsorship identification of the PAC that sponsored ads attacking political candidates was insufficient when the PAC was essentially financed by a single individual.

In September 2015, the Media Bureau dismissed the complaints. However, the bureau did not specifically find the allegations to be incorrect. Instead, the complaints were dismissed because petitioners never went to the stations to ask that they change the sponsorship identification on the PAC spots during the course of the election.

The bureau stated that it was using its prosecutorial discretion not to pursue these complaints, going so far as to say that the ruling might have been different had the request for a proper identification been made to the stations during the course of the election. Thus, broadcasters should be on the alert for complaints alleging that they have not properly identified the true sponsor of a PAC ad, and treat such ads seriously. See our summary here.

After the elections in November 2014, another complaint was filed by the same groups against a Chicago TV station claiming that the station should have identified former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg as the true sponsor of an ad run by a PAC. In this case, the station apparently was given written notice of the claim that the sponsorship identification should have included Mr. Bloomberg, which may distinguish it from prior cases. That issue remains pending. See our summary here.

Stay tuned for whether the Republican-led FCC takes further action on these issues.

Public Inspection File

TV stations are required to place their public inspection files online using an FCC-hosted website. As of June 29, 2017, broadcasters are no longer required to retain copies of letters and emails from the public in their public inspection files. The elimination of this rule essentially removes any responsibility for broadcasters to maintain a paper public file that is accessible to the public at their main studios. See our article here.

On a related note, the FCC has changed TV renewal applications to remove the requirement that TV stations identify any comments from the public about violent programming on the station.

For a summary of the general online public file obligations, see our summary here.

Retransmission Consent-Must Carry-STELAR

In July 2016, the previous FCC chairman announced in a blog post that the FCC was ending its inquiry into the retransmission consent rules without the adoption of any new rules. He stated that, after an extensive review of the record, “it is clear that more rules in this area are not what we need at this point.”

He noted that the FCC’s existing “totality of circumstances” standard for weighing complaints about violations of the good faith requirements was sufficiently inclusive to give the FCC scope to take enforcement action. “To start picking and choosing, in part, could limit future inquiries.”  See our analysis here and here. The item was formally removed from circulation by Chairman Ajit Pai.

As required by the STELA Reauthorization Act of 2014 (STELAR), the FCC adopted a new rule prohibiting the joint negotiation of retransmission consent agreements by two stations in the same market that are not “directly or indirectly under common de jure control,” regardless of whether those stations are among the top 4 stations in the market.

In September 2016, the FCC’s Media Bureau entered into a consent decree with Sinclair regarding this prohibition. While the company did not admit liability, the consent decree includes a finding that the company engaged in such negotiations on behalf of 36 non-owned stations. The company agreed to make a $9.495 million settlement payment and to implement a compliance plan. See our summary here.

STELAR also provides satellite television companies (essentially Dish Network and DirecTV, now owned by AT&T) with renewed eligibility, until the end of 2019, to rebroadcast the signals of over-the-air television stations without authorization from every copyright holder of the programming broadcast on those stations, through a so-called blanket compulsory license. Our summary of STELAR is available here.

STELAR required significant changes to the FCC’s market modification rules. Prior to STELAR, the FCC’s market modification rules did not apply to satellite companies. STELAR now puts those MVPDs on essentially the same footing as cable MVPDs in terms of market modifications.

In 2015, following a rulemaking proceeding to address these proposals, the FCC adopted new rules permitting the modification of satellite television markets.

Under the new rules, the FCC may, upon the request of a television station, satellite operator or county government, modify a particular commercial TV broadcast station’s local television market to add or delete communities from the market.

A related Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposes getting rid of the network nonduplication protection rules and the syndicated exclusivity rules. The abolition of these rules could affect the retransmission consent negotiation process, by allowing MVPDs to replace the programming of a television station that does not agree to proposed retransmission consent fees with the signal of another distant television station carrying the same programming.

See our discussion here for more details of the proceeding. It is unclear whether a Republican-led commission will take any action on this proposal.

Retransmission consent/must-carry election letters were required to be mailed by TV stations and received by MVPDs no later than Oct. 1, 2017, to be effective. These elections cover the period from Jan. 1, 2018, to Dec. 31, 2020. Copies of the election letters must be available in the station’s online public inspection file.

Sponsorship Identification

The FCC under the previous administration vigorously enforced its sponsorship ID rules, and the FCC under Chairman Ajit Pai has continued those enforcement efforts.

In December 2017, the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau proposed a fine of more than $13.3 million for apparent sponsorship identification violations by Sinclair Broadcast Group.

The FCC alleges that program segments contained in news broadcasts of certain Sinclair stations and certain program-length reports featured stories about the Huntsman Cancer Institute which were not tagged as being sponsored – even though they were broadcast as part of a contract that required that Sinclair air advertising for the Institute and develop programming about the Institute’s activities. See our summary here.

In January 2016, the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau announced a consent decree with Cumulus Radio to settle a matter in which full sponsorship identification announcements were not made on issue ads promoting an electric company’s construction project in New Hampshire.

In the consent decree, Cumulus agreed to pay a $540,000 civil penalty to the FCC for the violations of the rules — plus it agreed to institute a company-wide compliance program to make sure that similar violations did not occur in the future. See our article here.

In December 2014, the Enforcement Bureau entered into a consent decree with a television licensee for broadcasting “Special Reports” formatted in the style of a news report and featuring a station employee without disclosing that they were actually commercials paid for by local car dealerships, as required by the sponsorship identification rules. The licensee admitted liability and agreed to pay a $115,000 civil penalty.

The accompanying order described the rules not only as protecting consumers by “ensuring they know who is trying to persuade them,” but also as protecting competition by “providing a level playing field for advertisers who follow the rules.” See our summary here.

In February 2014, a Chicago radio station was fined $44,000 for 11 missing sponsorship ID tags. See our summary here. As set forth above in the Political Broadcasting discussion, the FCC recently acted on a complaint against two TV stations over the identification of the sponsor of ads attacking political candidates, alleging that the identification of the PAC that sponsored the ad was insufficient when the PAC was essentially financed by a single individual. It is unclear whether a Republican FCC will focus on these issues.

While a proposal was filed in 2015 suggesting that many sponsorship identification obligations be moved online, similar to the disclosure obligations for contest rules (see our summary of the proposal here), that proceeding has not progressed further. It is unclear if the new commission will revive that proposal.

Video News Releases The FCC has issued fines to television stations for airing freely-distributed video news releases without identifying the party who provided the VNR, and for broadcasting other programming for which the station or program host received consideration that was not disclosed.

For political matter or other programming on controversial issues, the station must announce who provided any tape or script used by the station.

For commercial programming, if the station airs content provided by a commercial company, and that use features the product of the company in more than a transient or fleeting manner, the party who provided the content must be disclosed.

A summary of some of the FCC cases where stations were fined for VNRs is available here.

Sponsorship Identification Online and In Social Media — In addition to FCC rules, the FTC requires that parties that have received any compensation in exchange for posting any materials online, disclose that the online material was sponsored. The extent of the sponsorship varies by the technological capabilities of the medium — with a “#ad” being the likely disclosure on Twitter, with more extensive disclosures on other platforms.

As broadcasters incorporate website content and social media mentions with on-air advertising campaigns, they should be aware of these obligations. See our summary of the FTC rules here, and an article here about the recent letters from the FTC to over 90 online “influencers” reminding them to abide by this policy.


See Retransmission Consent section above.


The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) is a law that restricts businesses and organizations from making calls and texts to consumers’ residential and wireless phones without having first received very specific permission from the recipient.

Sending texts to broadcast station viewers or listeners who are contained in a station’s loyal listener or loyal viewer clubs can lead to liability if the proper releases are not obtained, and collecting text addresses from contest participants and adding them to station databases can similarly be problematic.

Even where proper permission has been obtained, there can be liability for calls and texts to wireless numbers that have been reassigned, as well as to viewers or listeners who have revoked their consent.

Because violations of the TCPA can result in civil liability of $500 to $1,500 per call or text plus FCC fines, and as there have been a number of law firms around the country that have been active in filing class action suits against businesses to collect those potentially very high per-call damages, broadcasters need to ensure that their practices comply with the TCPA and the FCC’s rules which implement the Act.

In June 2016 a major radio group, iHeart Media, settled a TCPA lawsuit for $8.5 million. Read more about this issue here. Many parties are pushing the new FCC to reform its TCPA policies.

Tower And Antenna Issues

Under new legislation enacted by Congress in July 2016, rural towers that are less than 200 feet in height may need to have tower lights installed. The FAA is to conduct a rulemaking to adopt rules to implement this requirement. See more about this issue here. Many in the communications industry have expressed concern that the costs of implementing this rule outweighed any potential benefits of the rule.

In a blog post in March, FCC Commissioner Michael O’Rielly raised questions about whether the facts about communications towers had been fully considered when the legislation was adopted. He questioned why communications towers have been singled out, while wind turbines and electric towers are not covered, and he asked whether this disparate treatment was really justified. See our article here. The new Congress or the FAA may be revisting this legislation in the near future.

The FCC has aggressively enforced tower lighting and other tower-related violations, in one case seeking a fine of $25,000. Tower owners have been penalized for failing to have the required tower lights operating after sunset, failing to notify the FAA of any outages in a timely manner (so that the FAA can send out a NOTAM — a notice to “airmen” notifying them to beware of the unlit tower), and failing to update tower registration information, particularly when the tower is acquired by a new owner.

Failing to notify the FAA of tower light failures, as required by the rules, can lead not only to FCC fines but also to huge liability issues if the worst case happens and an aircraft should hit the unlit tower. We discuss many of these issues here and here.

In December 2015, the FAA announced new standards for tower lighting. See our summary here. The FAA’s guidance on tower lighting is now effective and will apply to any modified towers.

UHF Discount

Since 1985, in an effort to encourage further TV use of the UHF band over traditional VHF channels, TV licensees have received a one-half discount for UHF stations when analyzing the FCC’s 39% cap on the nationwide audience that can be reached by any one owner.

In September 2016, the commission voted 3-2 to eliminate the UHF discount. See our analysis here and here. That decision was challenged in court, and a petition for reconsideration was also filed with the FCC.

At its April 20, 2017, meeting, the FCC voted 2-1 to reinstate the UHF discount. See our summaries here and here. While this decision is not yet final, it has already triggered announcements of combinations of TV companies permissible only in reliance on the UHF discount.

On June 15, 2017, the US Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia denied a request by public interest groups to block the reinstatement of the UHF discount. See our article here. However, while the rule is now in effect, the public interest groups’ underlying appeal remains pending.

In December 2017, the FCC initiated a comprehensive review of the national audience reach cap and the UHF discount. The FCC’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking does not draw any conclusions, but is seeking comment on the following issues:

  • Whether the FCC has the statutory authority to modify or eliminate the national cap.
  • If statutory authority exists, whether the national cap should be modified or eliminated in light of increased video programming options or other factors since the FCC adopted the current 39% cap.
  • If a national cap is retained, whether it should be raised simultaneously with the elimination of the UHF discount and if so, by how much.
  • Whether the national cap continues to serve the public interest and if so, what public interest goals, such as localism, it continues to foster.
  • The benefits and costs associated with maintaining or increasing the cap.
  • The comment deadlines for this proceeding have not been announced yet.

Video Description

The video description rules are intended to assist individuals with visual impairments by requiring the insertion of audio narrations into the natural pauses in programming to describe what is happening on-screen. These narrations are carried on the secondary audio program (SAP) channel.

Under the video description rules, Top-4 affiliates (ABC, CBS, Fox and NBC) in the top 60 markets, and multichannel video programming distributor systems (MVPDs) with more than 50,000 subscribers, must provide approximately four hours per week (for a total of 50 hours per quarter) of video-described primetime and/or children’s programming.

Beginning July 1, 2018, each broadcast station affiliated with a top 4 network (ABC, CBS, Fox and NBC) in the top 60 markets, and each of the top 5 non-broadcast networks (currently Disney Channel, History, TBS, TNT, and USA) must provide 87.5 hours of qualifying video-described programming per quarter on each stream or channel on which it carries an included network. This is an increase from the current obligation to carry 50 hours of qualifying video-described programming per quarter.

The FCC provided flexibility to allow some non-prime time, non-children’s video-described programming to count towards the additional 37.5 hours per quarter. The FCC left unchanged the rule that a particular video-described program/episode can be counted toward the benchmark no more than a total of two times on each channel on which the program is shown.

The rules also require that all television stations and MVPDs, regardless of market or system size, “pass through” any such video-described programming. All of these requirements are now in effect.

White Spaces/Unlicensed Devices/Wireless Microphones

The FCC has proposed that in each TV market, one UHF TV channel (above ch. 21) that is not assigned to a TV station following the repacking will be designated for use by TV white space (TVWS) and wireless microphones. In certain markets, where TV stations are placed into the wireless 600 MHz band, the FCC proposed a second open TV channel for shared use by TVWS devices and wireless microphones, in addition to the other channel it is already proposing to reserve.

Microsoft has been pushing unlicensed TV white spaces as a rural broadband solution. The NAB is pushing back, particularly on Microsoft’s effort to set aside one 6 MHz channel in each market for unlicensed devices. Notably, Commissioner (now Chairman) Ajit Pai dissented on this issue, as did Commissioner Michael O’Rielly. So it remains to be seen whether this proposal goes anywhere under the new Republican-led commission.

Microsoft was not an incentive auction participant, and is arguably trying to get access to unlicensed airwaves without paying for them. There are numerous technological hurdles for Microsoft and other white space operators, and there is of course the potential for harmful interference to over the air broadcasting.

The FCC also proposed to require applicants for LPTV, TV translator and Broadcast Auxiliary Service facilities to demonstrate that any proposed facilities would not eliminate the last available vacant UHF television channel for use by TVWS devices and wireless microphones in the market. The pleading cycle has ended for this proceeding, but questions have been raised about whether these proposed spectrum reservations would unlawfully prioritize unlicensed facilities over licensed ones.

In February 2016, in response to a petition filed by the NAB, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Order, proposing to amend its rules to improve the quality of the geographic location and other data submitted for fixed TVWS devices operating on unused frequencies in the TV bands and the new 600 MHz wireless band.

According to the NPRM, the proposals are designed to improve the integrity of the white space database system and to increase the confidence of all users of these frequency bands that the white space geolocation/database spectrum management scheme fully protects licensees and other authorized users.

In November 2016, the NAB asked the FCC to either adopt and enforce geolocation requirements that allow TVWS devices to coexist with licensed operations, or eliminate or suspend TVWS operations.

NAB also suggested that TVWS database managers are not complying with push-notification requirements about updated channel availabilities because there are no industry standards for implementing push notifications, and TVWS manufacturers have not taken steps to implement the requirements. More information is available here.

The use of wireless microphone devices in the 700 MHz band was prohibited by the FCC in 2010. However, the current 600 MHz band and other frequencies remain used by broadcasters and others for wireless microphones. In July 2017, the FCC announced new point-of-sale disclosure requirements for 600 MHz licensed wireless microphones. Once the new rules are published in the Federal Register, the required disclosure language will read as follows:

“This particular wireless microphone device operates in portions of the 617-652 MHz or 663-698 MHz frequencies. Beginning in 2017, these frequencies are being transitioned by the [FCC] to the 600 MHz service to meet increasing demand for wireless broadband services. Users of this device must cease operating on these frequencies no later than July 13, 2020. In addition, users of this device may be required to cease operations earlier than that date if their operations could cause harmful interference to a 600 MHz service licensee’s wireless operations on these frequencies.”

In July 2017, the FCC refused to permit wireless microphone users that operate on an unlicensed basis in the TV bands, the 600 MHz duplex guard band and duplex gap to register their operations in the TV white spaces databases to obtain interference protection from white space devices.

However, the FCC issued a Further Notice proceeding in which it proposes to permit certain qualifying professional theaters, music, and performing arts organizations to obtain a Part 74 license that would allow them, as licensees, to obtain interference protection in the TV bands and, when needed, also to operate in other spectrum bands authorized for licensed wireless microphone operations. The pleading cycle for this proceeding has not been announced yet.

Separately, the Further Notice will revisit the FCC’s previous decision that companies that use 50 or more wireless microphones will have the same interference protection as low power wireless audio devices. The Further Notice proposes expanding this group to include:

  • Wireless microphone users that routinely use 50 or more wireless microphones where the use is an integral part of major events or productions (as provided under existing rules).
  • Wireless microphone users that otherwise can demonstrate a particular need for, and the capability to provide, professional, high-quality audio that is integral to their events or productions.

In addition, the FCC clarified various rules for licensed wireless microphone use in the 169-172 MHz band, the 941.5-944 MHz band, and the 1435-1525 MHz band.

Comments (241)

Leave a Reply

Amneris Vargas says:

January 15, 2018 at 1:01 pm

Incredible piece of work and organization here. Copied as reference manual.

Veronica Serrano Padilla says:

January 15, 2018 at 9:37 pm

Yeah, this is the series that fake poster “Roger Thornhill” complained in 2016 was so many pages due to the Obama administration and its supposed penchant for regulations. This year it’s 17 pages long yet no complaints from Fake Roger. What’s up with that? Oh, yeah, he can’t blame Obama any more (and would never say anything bad about his hero, Trumpo the Cheeto-faced Clown).

garciniacambogiapremium.net says:

July 13, 2018 at 9:16 am

Have actually been taking little over a month.

garciniacambogiapremium.net says:

July 13, 2018 at 9:44 am

Have actually been taking little over a month.

Blundering Ben says:

July 15, 2018 at 2:37 am


Robert's Blow Boy says:

July 15, 2018 at 8:42 am

Most people do not actually understand what it is about.
I thought it will be interesting to show the details.

Robert's Blow Boy says:

July 15, 2018 at 1:24 pm

Whenever I feel any outward symptoms coming on we straight away take action to ensure
I will not be entirely out the week.

joma jewellery busy bee says:

July 15, 2018 at 2:37 pm

However it is typically very difficult to seek out one that will be
a precise match for an unusual engagement ring.

Robert's Blow Boy says:

July 15, 2018 at 5:19 pm

Get six-pack abs by doing yoga exercises. Performing yoga postures can provide a curvy shaped figure to flaunt it with
full confidence.

Blundering Ben says:

July 16, 2018 at 5:56 am

To handle the animal legal rights activists, I am completely with you about the
undeniable fact that pets must stop being ill-treated while
in captivity.

garciniacambogiapremium.net says:

July 16, 2018 at 9:54 am

Have actually been taking little over a month.

https://uk.linkedin.com/in/benjamin-appleby-21bb75a0 says:

July 16, 2018 at 10:31 am

Here we explain why i really believe this
isn’t true and just why I think the band is going to succeed even more!

Blundering Ben says:

July 16, 2018 at 3:52 pm

Are you guaranteed in full another alive when you get into a motor

Blundering Ben says:

July 17, 2018 at 2:25 am

Chunk down and act usually. Stop talking about the
issue to other individuals preventing taking into consideration the problem
in your thoughts – and start doing.

Blundering Ben says:

July 17, 2018 at 3:07 am

It is not real therefore stop whining and obtain over yourselves.

Bungling Ben says:

July 17, 2018 at 3:20 am

This short article allow you to design and keep a far more
effective notebook.

Blundering Ben says:

July 17, 2018 at 3:34 am

Let us simply say all you needed ended up being a kiddie pool,
only a little beach sand while could have gone swimming it absolutely was so hot!

indiancountrymedianetwork.com says:

July 17, 2018 at 11:59 am

You coսld defnitely seee your enthusiasm within tһe work you ᴡrite.
The sector hopes for more passіonate wгiters like you who are not afraid to mention how they
believe. Always go aftеr your heart. “In America, through pressure of conformity, there is freedom of choice, but nothing to choose from.” byy
Pete Ustinov.

https://i.imgur.com/l7Zk2xt.jpg says:

July 20, 2018 at 10:16 am

Tips for those hesitant to become listed on Twitter.

joma jewellery snowflake says:

July 20, 2018 at 3:34 pm

Chitrangada, thanks for sharing these useful tricks to keep the gold jewellery shining and good.
And to think I bought it for its history!

login.libproxy.Aalto.fi says:

July 20, 2018 at 9:45 pm

Traditional promenade gown types, comparable to those that reflect back to outdated Hollywood glamour and dresses with
sequins all the time function well-liked alternatives.

Robert's BJ boy says:

July 21, 2018 at 11:22 am

No model had been sacrificed in this story of our head.

joma jewellery liverpool says:

July 21, 2018 at 5:08 pm

7. Mirali Gulati: She is a Delhi-primarily based designer and proprietor of the Mirari boutique, trained
for two years in the US as a gemologist and jewelry designer.

zvodretiluret says:

July 21, 2018 at 7:40 pm

Very interesting topic, appreciate it for posting.

chinapaper.org says:

July 22, 2018 at 11:05 am

It’s enjoyable to share opinions, and jewellery (as long as it isn’t mass produced, boring jewellery) is a favorite topic of mine.

zvodret iluret says:

July 23, 2018 at 6:29 am

Hey there would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re working with? I’m going to start my own blog in the near future but I’m having a tough time making a decision between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something unique. P.S Sorry for getting off-topic but I had to ask!

scarlett pain big cock says:

July 23, 2018 at 6:43 am

I like this weblog very much, Its a real nice billet to read
and receive information.

zvodret iluret says:

July 24, 2018 at 3:50 am

As I website owner I think the subject matter here is very good, appreciate it for your efforts.

zvodret iluret says:

July 24, 2018 at 3:54 am

I do not even understand how I stopped up right here, however I believed this publish was good. I don’t understand who you might be however definitely you are going to a famous blogger if you aren’t already 😉 Cheers!

ergfir nolikz says:

July 25, 2018 at 7:57 am

The subsequent time I read a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as a lot as this one. I mean, I know it was my choice to read, however I actually thought youd have something fascinating to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about one thing that you can fix for those who werent too busy looking for attention.

Saudi Airlines Dhaka Office says:

July 27, 2018 at 11:42 am

Respect to post author, some excellent selective information.

etihad airlines dhaka office says:

July 27, 2018 at 11:44 am

You actually make it appear so easy with your presentation but I to find this topic to be actually one thing that I think I would by no means understand. It seems too complex and extremely vast for me. I am taking a look ahead for your next put up, I will try to get the cling of it!

empreender says:

July 27, 2018 at 4:21 pm

Very interesting topic, appreciate it for putting up. “Experience a comb life gives you after you lose your hair.” by Judith Stern.

how to patent a product idea says:

July 27, 2018 at 8:52 pm

Very interesting details you have mentioned, thankyou for putting up. “The biggest fool may come out with a bit of sense when you least expect it.” by Eden Phillpotts.

new product idea says:

July 27, 2018 at 8:53 pm

I dugg some of you post as I cogitated they were invaluable very beneficial

Matthew Henson says:

July 28, 2018 at 3:48 pm

I like what you guys are up also. Such clever work and reporting! Keep up the superb works guys I have incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it’ll improve the value of my site 🙂

anon says:

July 28, 2018 at 8:06 pm

How wrong it is to cling closely onto ATSC 1.0 so that it could be used for ever.
I am no engineer but ATSC 3.0 brings us efficiency with a robust modulation by removing 8VSB and adopting OFDM so it works best with SFN.
I do not believe that ATSC 1.0 users and broadcasters should be forced to give up their assets of ATSC 1.0 be scrapped any time soon; or/and be marooned on a deserted island but there has to be a sensible mandate to defunct ATSC1.0. …May be after a reasonable time elapses: after a decade? may be 15 years from 2018? or may be two decades from the year 2018? But change has to happen!!
…If not the whole ATSC be made defunct in the future so that a new system could be forged.

alprazolam pills says:

July 30, 2018 at 5:57 am

I have been examinating out some of your stories and i must say clever stuff. I will surely bookmark your blog.

restoril online says:

July 30, 2018 at 5:58 am

I?¦ve recently started a website, the information you offer on this web site has helped me tremendously. Thanks for all of your time & work.

Tips Certification says:

July 30, 2018 at 10:55 am

I truly appreciate this post. I’ve been looking everywhere for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You’ve made my day! Thank you again!

Tips Certification says:

July 30, 2018 at 10:56 am

This web site is really a walk-through for all of the info you wanted about this and didn’t know who to ask. Glimpse here, and you’ll definitely discover it.

Scottsdale Tow Truck Company says:

July 31, 2018 at 9:38 am

I appreciate, cause I found just what I was looking for. You have ended my four day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a nice day. Bye

link says:

July 31, 2018 at 2:53 pm

I have learn a few excellent stuff here. Definitely worth bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how so much attempt you set to make this type of great informative website.

visit says:

July 31, 2018 at 2:55 pm

I do not even know how I stopped up here, however I thought this submit was great. I don’t recognize who you might be however definitely you are going to a famous blogger if you happen to are not already 😉 Cheers!

http://lauragettinger.tumblr.com/post/176299093621/how-inventhelp-can-change-your-business-destiny says:

August 1, 2018 at 10:01 am

You made certain nice points there. I did a search on the theme and found mainly persons will consent with your blog.

https://irinawheeler.wordpress.com/2018/07/27/inventhelp-the-best-way-to-protect-your-business-ideas/ says:

August 1, 2018 at 3:49 pm

Great tremendous things here. I am very happy to see your article. Thanks a lot and i am taking a look ahead to touch you. Will you please drop me a mail?

https://irinawheeler.wordpress.com/2018/07/27/the-improvements-inventhelp-offers-to-your-company/ says:

August 1, 2018 at 3:50 pm

A formidable share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing slightly analysis on this. And he actually purchased me breakfast as a result of I discovered it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the deal with! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to debate this, I feel strongly about it and love studying extra on this topic. If attainable, as you turn out to be expertise, would you thoughts updating your weblog with more details? It’s highly helpful for me. Massive thumb up for this weblog post!

http://guevara.activite-domicile-mlm.com/inventhelp-review-and-how-to-help-turn-your-idea-into-an-invention/ says:

August 3, 2018 at 6:00 am

I reckon something genuinely interesting about your weblog so I saved to bookmarks.

www.lao88.co says:

August 3, 2018 at 9:22 pm

I haven’t checked in here for some time since I thought it was getting boring, but the last several posts are great quality so I guess I’ll add you back to my daily bloglist. You deserve it my friend 🙂

www.lao88.co says:

August 3, 2018 at 9:23 pm

Real clear web site, thankyou for this post.

Free auto approve list 7-27-2018 says:

August 4, 2018 at 1:06 am

I added a new list. As you’ll see it’s bigger than most of them. I hope you all have had a great week!

concrete patio repair says:

August 4, 2018 at 11:17 am

Your house is valueble for me. Thanks!…

click says:

August 4, 2018 at 11:17 am

Thanks for every other fantastic post. The place else could anyone get that kind of info in such an ideal way of writing? I have a presentation subsequent week, and I am at the look for such info.

car insurance cost says:

August 4, 2018 at 4:29 pm

You are a very intelligent individual!

vehicle insurance cost comparison says:

August 4, 2018 at 4:29 pm

I think this web site contains some very superb information for everyone. “Billy T-T-T-T-Today, Junior” by Billy Madison.

payless auto insurance tips says:

August 4, 2018 at 10:06 pm

I cling on to listening to the newscast lecture about getting free online grant applications so I have been looking around for the top site to get one. Could you advise me please, where could i get some?

True First Sitemap says:

August 4, 2018 at 11:27 pm

Real nice design and fantastic content material, nothing at all else we need : D.

True First says:

August 4, 2018 at 11:28 pm

Very good written post. It will be valuable to everyone who usess it, as well as me. Keep doing what you are doing – looking forward to more posts.

start auto insurance comparison says:

August 5, 2018 at 3:40 am

Wonderful items from you, man. I’ve take note your stuff prior to and you’re just extremely great. I actually like what you have acquired here, really like what you are stating and the way in which wherein you are saying it. You make it enjoyable and you still care for to stay it sensible. I cant wait to learn much more from you. This is actually a wonderful web site.

compare auto insurance USA says:

August 5, 2018 at 3:40 am

Hi, just required you to know I he added your site to my Google bookmarks due to your layout. But seriously, I believe your internet site has 1 in the freshest theme I??ve came across. It extremely helps make reading your blog significantly easier.

Auto quotes says:

August 5, 2018 at 9:01 am

As I website owner I think the content material here is real excellent, thankyou for your efforts.

Get auto in us says:

August 5, 2018 at 9:02 am

Appreciate it for all your efforts that you have put in this. very interesting info .

Motley says:

August 5, 2018 at 9:13 am

My brother suggested I might like this website. He was totally right. This post actually made my day. You can not imagine simply how much time I had spent for this information! Thanks!

True First Series says:

August 5, 2018 at 9:14 am

Your style is so unique compared to many other people. Thank you for publishing when you have the opportunity,Guess I will just make this bookmarked.2

average home insurance cost says:

August 5, 2018 at 2:52 pm

I will immediately grasp your rss as I can not find your email subscription link or newsletter service. Do you’ve any? Please allow me know so that I may just subscribe. Thanks.

home insurance cost calculator says:

August 5, 2018 at 2:53 pm

Well I really liked studying it. This tip provided by you is very effective for correct planning.

average cost of home insurance in california says:

August 5, 2018 at 8:24 pm

I really like gathering utile information , this post has got me even more info! .

average cost of house insurance massachusetts says:

August 5, 2018 at 8:25 pm

Hi, i think that i saw you visited my website thus i came to “return the favor”.I’m trying to find things to enhance my website!I suppose its ok to use a few of your ideas!!

home and car insurance bundle says:

August 6, 2018 at 2:04 am

I’ve recently started a website, the information you provide on this website has helped me tremendously. Thanks for all of your time & work.

auto home insurance quotes in usa says:

August 6, 2018 at 2:05 am

Awsome website! I am loving it!! Will be back later to read some more. I am bookmarking your feeds also

True First says:

August 6, 2018 at 5:19 am

I’ve been surfing on-line greater than 3 hours lately, but I never found any interesting article like yours. It’s lovely value enough for me. Personally, if all web owners and bloggers made just right content material as you probably did, the net shall be a lot more helpful than ever before.

Miller says:

August 6, 2018 at 5:20 am

I’ll right away snatch your rss feed as I can’t in finding your email subscription hyperlink or newsletter service. Do you’ve any? Kindly let me recognise so that I may subscribe. Thanks.

types of homeowners insurance policies says:

August 6, 2018 at 7:36 am

That is the correct blog for anybody who wants to find out about this topic. You realize so much its virtually laborious to argue with you (not that I truly would need…HaHa). You definitely put a new spin on a topic thats been written about for years. Great stuff, just great!

home insurance coverage types says:

August 6, 2018 at 7:36 am

Good day! I know this is kinda off topic however I’d figured I’d ask. Would you be interested in exchanging links or maybe guest authoring a blog post or vice-versa? My site addresses a lot of the same topics as yours and I feel we could greatly benefit from each other. If you are interested feel free to send me an email. I look forward to hearing from you! Great blog by the way!

appliance home insurance says:

August 6, 2018 at 12:31 pm

excellent post, very informative. I wonder why the other experts of this sector do not notice this. You should continue your writing. I am sure, you’ve a huge readers’ base already!

additional homeowners insurance for appliances says:

August 6, 2018 at 12:32 pm

Hey there are using WordPress for your blog platform? I’m new to the blog world but I’m trying to get started and create my own. Do you need any coding expertise to make your own blog? Any help would be really appreciated!

Walker says:

August 6, 2018 at 2:14 pm

Of course, what a fantastic blog and revealing posts, I will bookmark your site.Best Regards!

Brian Cook says:

August 6, 2018 at 2:16 pm

Valuable info. Lucky me I found your site by accident, and I’m shocked why this accident did not happened earlier! I bookmarked it.

getting home insurance quotes says:

August 6, 2018 at 6:00 pm

In this awesome design of things you actually receive an A+ with regard to hard work. Exactly where you actually confused us was first in your particulars. As they say, the devil is in the details… And it could not be much more true here. Having said that, allow me reveal to you exactly what did deliver the results. Your authoring is rather powerful and this is possibly why I am making an effort in order to opine. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Next, although I can certainly notice the leaps in reasoning you come up with, I am not sure of just how you appear to unite the details which in turn produce the conclusion. For right now I shall subscribe to your point but trust in the foreseeable future you actually link the dots much better.

getting home insurance before closing says:

August 6, 2018 at 6:02 pm

I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great. I do not know who you are but certainly you’re going to a famous blogger if you aren’t already 😉 Cheers!

True First Series says:

August 6, 2018 at 11:39 pm

Thank you for sharing with us, I think this website really stands out : D.

True First Series says:

August 6, 2018 at 11:40 pm

Excellent blog! Do you have any hints for aspiring writers? I’m planning to start my own blog soon but I’m a little lost on everything. Would you propose starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a paid option? There are so many options out there that I’m completely overwhelmed .. Any ideas? Thanks a lot!

xxx-partner.com says:

August 7, 2018 at 4:52 am

I haven?¦t checked in here for a while as I thought it was getting boring, but the last few posts are good quality so I guess I?¦ll add you back to my daily bloglist. You deserve it my friend 🙂

adult partners says:

August 7, 2018 at 4:53 am

This really answered my downside, thank you!

adderall dosage says:

August 7, 2018 at 4:14 pm

Does your blog have a contact page? I’m having problems locating it but, I’d like to send you an email. I’ve got some creative ideas for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great site and I look forward to seeing it grow over time.

adhd treatment says:

August 7, 2018 at 4:14 pm

Hiya very nice site!! Guy .. Excellent .. Wonderful .. I will bookmark your web site and take the feeds additionally…I am satisfied to find numerous helpful info right here within the post, we’d like work out more strategies in this regard, thank you for sharing.

cathleenprecious says:

August 7, 2018 at 9:40 pm

It’s been a busy week for you. What’s the best way to get rid of the stress of a busy week? The best and only way is by spending some time with the beauties over at http://www.camgirl.pw These are the girls who know how to treat a man right.

InventHelp Office Locations says:

August 8, 2018 at 4:53 am

Precisely what I was searching for, thankyou for putting up.

Dow Theory signals says:

August 8, 2018 at 7:48 am

I wanted to create you that little remark so as to thank you very much as before about the exceptional secrets you have shared on this site. It has been quite shockingly generous with you to deliver publicly just what some people would have offered for sale as an electronic book in making some dough for their own end, precisely given that you could possibly have done it in case you desired. Those inspiring ideas additionally acted like the great way to fully grasp other people have similar keenness like my personal own to know the truth way more with reference to this issue. I’m certain there are lots of more pleasant occasions up front for those who discover your blog post.

amberlaray says:

August 8, 2018 at 8:56 am

A good time is what you’ll have with the girls at http://www.camgirl.pw. This is by far the most exciting site on the entire internet. Don’t think twice about visiting this site. Not if you’re in the mood to have a little kinky fun.

Inductive Vs deductive reasoning, which one is better says:

August 8, 2018 at 10:08 am

I think you have observed some very interesting points, appreciate it for the post.

Tactical Investors says:

August 8, 2018 at 1:34 pm

Hi! I’ve been reading your blog for some time now and finally got the courage to go ahead and give you a shout out from Atascocita Tx! Just wanted to tell you keep up the excellent job!

ryannabanks says:

August 8, 2018 at 3:13 pm

Are you searching for a little fun? If you are, then http://www.camgirl.pw is the best site for just that. You’ll find plenty of hot babes there who love to get down and dirty. That’s exactly what you’re looking for right this very second.

Is value investing dead? says:

August 8, 2018 at 3:50 pm

It is really a nice and helpful piece of information. I am glad that you shared this helpful information with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thank you for sharing.

Mass Psychology says:

August 8, 2018 at 7:06 pm

Loving the information on this internet site, you have done outstanding job on the blog posts.

Stock Market Bull 2018 says:

August 8, 2018 at 9:24 pm

Hi, just required you to know I he added your site to my Google bookmarks due to your layout. But seriously, I believe your internet site has 1 in the freshest theme I??ve came across. It extremely helps make reading your blog significantly easier.

Stock Market Bull 2018 says:

August 9, 2018 at 12:46 am

After study just a few of the weblog posts in your web site now, and I really like your means of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark website checklist and will probably be checking back soon. Pls check out my web site as properly and let me know what you think.

Black Monday worst one-day stock market crash says:

August 9, 2018 at 3:06 am

An interesting discussion is worth comment. I think that you should write more on this topic, it might not be a taboo subject but generally people are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers

Mass Psychology says:

August 9, 2018 at 8:45 am

I like what you guys are up also. Such smart work and reporting! Carry on the excellent works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it’ll improve the value of my site 🙂

Is value investing dead says:

August 9, 2018 at 11:58 am

Hey, you used to write wonderful, but the last few posts have been kinda boring… I miss your super writings. Past few posts are just a bit out of track! come on!

The cholesterol Myth that could harming you says:

August 9, 2018 at 2:21 pm

I would like to thnkx for the efforts you have put in writing this blog. I am hoping the same high-grade blog post from you in the upcoming as well. In fact your creative writing abilities has inspired me to get my own blog now. Really the blogging is spreading its wings quickly. Your write up is a good example of it.

Stock Market Bull 2018 says:

August 9, 2018 at 5:29 pm

Thank you, I have just been searching for info about this topic for ages and yours is the greatest I’ve discovered till now. But, what about the bottom line? Are you certain in regards to the source?

Is value investing dead? says:

August 9, 2018 at 7:47 pm

I always was interested in this topic and still am, regards for putting up.

Stock Market Bull 2018 says:

August 9, 2018 at 11:03 pm

When I initially commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get three emails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove people from that service? Many thanks!

Mass psychology for dummies says:

August 10, 2018 at 4:45 am

Good write-up, I?¦m normal visitor of one?¦s site, maintain up the excellent operate, and It’s going to be a regular visitor for a lengthy time.

Is the stock market going to crash? says:

August 10, 2018 at 7:05 am

I am not rattling great with English but I find this real easygoing to translate.

Best online dating site says:

August 10, 2018 at 9:55 am

Are you looking for love in all the wrong places? There’s just one site where you can meet all kinds of local singles. There’s never a shortage of girls at this site. By far the best part is, you can go on a date tonight. Hook up here https://t.irtyc.com/awx9mr337k?aff_id=29696&offer_id=3788&nopop=1 and start the day off right. Before you know it, you’ll be in love and hearing the birds sing once again.

Contrarian Investing says:

August 10, 2018 at 10:34 am

We’re a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your site offered us with valuable information to work on. You’ve done a formidable job and our entire community will be grateful to you.

Contrarian investors says:

August 10, 2018 at 12:49 pm

Please let me know if you’re looking for a writer for your blog. You have some really great articles and I feel I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d love to write some material for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please send me an email if interested. Thanks!

Best dating site says:

August 11, 2018 at 1:07 am

Are you searching for a date? If so, there’s just one place where you should go. https://t.irtyc.com/vb8tffw9ts?aff_id=29696&offer_id=3785&nopop=1 has more horny singles than any other place online. You can go there and hook up immediately. These are the type of singles who like to have some fun in the sack. Get laid today and put a big smile on your face tonight.

pikachu onesie says:

August 11, 2018 at 2:08 am

I’m not sure where you are getting your info,
but good topic. I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more.
Thanks for great information I was looking for this info for my

business ideas in canada says:

August 11, 2018 at 3:16 am

Great line up. We will be linking to this great article on our site. Keep up the good writing.

flipkart company profile says:

August 11, 2018 at 5:21 am

Thanks for the sensible critique. Me & my neighbor were just preparing to do some research about this. We got a grab a book from our area library but I think I learned more clear from this post. I’m very glad to see such excellent info being shared freely out there.

www.ilpc.ssru.ac.th says:

August 11, 2018 at 8:12 am

I like this weblog very much, Its a real nice office to read and incur info .

www.ilpc.ssru.ac.th says:

August 11, 2018 at 10:17 am

great points altogether, you just gained a brand new reader. What would you suggest about your post that you made a few days ago? Any positive?

buy anabolic steroids says:

August 11, 2018 at 5:19 pm

Great write-up, I am normal visitor of one’s site, maintain up the nice operate, and It is going to be a regular visitor for a long time.

buy anabolic steroids says:

August 11, 2018 at 6:30 pm

Great write-up, I am normal visitor of one’s web site, maintain up the excellent operate, and It is going to be a regular visitor for a long time.

como seduzir as mulheres says:

August 11, 2018 at 10:54 pm

excellent post.Ne’er knew this, appreciate it for letting me know.

não crie expectativas says:

August 12, 2018 at 12:04 am

I’m typically to running a blog and i actually appreciate your content. The article has actually peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your website and maintain checking for brand spanking new information.

Learn how to become a millionaire says:

August 12, 2018 at 12:57 am

Just imagine for a second if you could get into the mind of a millionaire. Think of all the things that you could learn. Well, you actually can do just that. A millionaire is giving away all of his secret right on the internet. You don’t even need to leave the house to learn what made him rich. All it takes is visiting http://e31a67zd-ccr7u13el2cflqp0d.hop.clickbank.net He will literally teach you all of the secrets to making money. Don’t you think it’s time that you earned the living that you deserve? Change your life today by simply following the link above. Do it for yourself and everyone that you care about.

Make Money Promoting ClickBank says:

August 13, 2018 at 1:35 am

Did you know that people make their entire income promoting ClickBank? You too could be one of the many who have quit their job. Affiliate marketing is as old as the internet. It’s not going to go away any time soon. You too can get your piece of the pie. Why shouldn’t you? Do you really like working the job you have? Are you going to be able to do it until you retire? If you’re job requires physical labor, then you know the answer to that question. There’s no way you’re going to be able to do that when you get older. That’s just the truth and no one needs to tell it to you. Right now you could be making money online. Does it require work? You better believe it does. No honest person is ever going to tell you that it’s possible to become a millionaire online without doing any work whatsoever. It’s not possible. That doesn’t mean there isn’t money to be made. There’s plenty of money out there to be made by people just like yourself. Now you know there’s going to be a pitch for a product. You’re right about that. Click on the link http://64efd6-lz41s3rcelbr7s2xl7x.hop.clickbank.net/ and check it out. There’s a video you can watch that will explain everything. It will tell you how to make money using ClickBank. Watch the video and see what you think. You too can be one of the many who earn a living promoting ClickBank. Some people earn a good living and there’s no reason why you can’t.

film 4k streaming says:

August 13, 2018 at 6:52 am

Howdy very nice blog!! Guy .. Excellent .. Wonderful .. I will bookmark your site and take the feeds also…I am satisfied to find so many useful info right here in the publish, we need work out more strategies in this regard, thank you for sharing. . . . . .

film 4k streaming says:

August 13, 2018 at 8:05 am

Rattling good information can be found on web site.

Kit Fetiche says:

August 14, 2018 at 8:14 am

Great line up. We will be linking to this great article on our site. Keep up the good writing.

https://lawandajuarez.wordpress.com/tag/inventhelp-blog/page/3/ says:

August 15, 2018 at 2:51 am

You made a few fine points there. I did a search on the subject and found the majority of people will agree with your blog.

InventHelp Commercial says:

August 15, 2018 at 10:57 am

I love it when people come together and share opinions, great blog, keep it up.

how do i patent an idea says:

August 15, 2018 at 12:08 pm

This is the right blog for anyone who wants to find out about this topic. You realize so much its almost hard to argue with you (not that I actually would want…HaHa). You definitely put a new spin on a topic thats been written about for years. Great stuff, just great!

mobile back cover with my photo says:

August 17, 2018 at 3:59 am

Good info. Lucky me I reach on your website by accident, I bookmarked it.

personalised gifts for men India says:

August 17, 2018 at 5:11 am

Magnificent web site. Lots of useful info here. I am sending it to a few friends ans also sharing in delicious. And obviously, thanks for your effort!

check out the post right here says:

August 17, 2018 at 9:30 am

Wow! Thank you! I continuously wanted to write on my website something like that. Can I take a portion of your post to my website?

fotballdrakter barn says:

August 18, 2018 at 11:19 pm

You have got awesome knowlwdge on this site.

magliette calcio says:

August 18, 2018 at 11:43 pm

The posts is extremely exciting.

nuove maglie calcio says:

August 18, 2018 at 11:46 pm

I treasure the info on your internet site. Thank you so much!

fotballdrakter barn says:

August 19, 2018 at 1:06 am

I appreciate the info on your websites. Appreciate it!

giá hạt xốp màu says:

August 19, 2018 at 3:19 am

The very root of your writing whilst appearing agreeable in the beginning, did not settle well with me after some time. Someplace within the sentences you were able to make me a believer unfortunately just for a very short while. I nevertheless have a problem with your jumps in logic and one would do well to fill in all those gaps. In the event that you actually can accomplish that, I could certainly be fascinated.

fodboldtrøjer says:

August 19, 2018 at 4:08 am

You’ve got wonderful thing in this article.

billige fodboldtrøjer says:

August 19, 2018 at 4:24 am

Your advice is very significant.

xốp bỏ hộp quà says:

August 19, 2018 at 5:48 am

I’m extremely inspired together with your writing talents and also with the format in your weblog. Is that this a paid subject or did you customize it yourself? Either way stay up the excellent high quality writing, it is uncommon to see a great weblog like this one today..

hoodies for men says:

August 19, 2018 at 9:41 am

Have you ever thought about including a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is important and all. But think about if you added some great graphics or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with pics and video clips, this site could definitely be one of the most beneficial in its field. Very good blog!

fodboldtrøjer børn says:

August 19, 2018 at 10:25 am

You’ve got among the best online sites.

leather backpack for men says:

August 19, 2018 at 11:11 am

I love your blog.. very nice colors & theme.
Did you make this website yourself or did you hiure someone to doo
it for you? Plzz answqer back as I’m looking to constrhct
my own blog and wwould like to find out whhere u got this from.

thanks a lot

womens hoodies says:

August 19, 2018 at 12:07 pm

Hey! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any trouble with hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing a few months of hard work due to no back up. Do you have any solutions to prevent hackers?

php seo says:

August 19, 2018 at 1:10 pm

PHP SEO: Search Engine Optimization
php seo uzmanı olarak şirketimiz php seo hizmeti vermektedir günümüz ortamında site sahiplerinin php bilgisi nekadar iyi olsada php seo metotları arama motorlarında optimize edilmesi gereken hususlardan bir tanesi web siteniz nekadar iyi olsada arama motorlarına duyarlı olmasına özen gösterin. php seo uzmanlarımızdan destek alabilirsiniz.

fotbollströjor barn says:

August 19, 2018 at 10:31 pm

I enjoy the knowledge on your site. Thanks for your time.

billiga fotbollströjor says:

August 20, 2018 at 2:04 am

I like this website – its so usefull and helpfull.

magliette calcio poco prezzo says:

August 20, 2018 at 3:58 am

Truly, this is a invaluable internet site.

fotbollströjor med tryck says:

August 20, 2018 at 4:36 am

Truly helpful look forth to coming back again.

maglie calcio says:

August 20, 2018 at 4:49 am

Love the site– really user friendly and lots to see!

fotbollströjor med eget tryck says:

August 20, 2018 at 5:20 am

Love the website– very individual friendly and great deals to see!

fotballdrakter barn says:

August 20, 2018 at 10:21 am

Truly insightful look forward to coming back.

fodboldtrøjer says:

August 20, 2018 at 10:21 am

Thanks intended for giving this kind of superior information.

fotballdrakter barn says:

August 20, 2018 at 10:25 am

Thanks, this website is very useful.

Maglie Calcio a poco prezzo says:

August 20, 2018 at 3:12 pm

Many thanks, this site is very useful.

maglie del calcio says:

August 20, 2018 at 5:04 pm

Wonderful site you possess right here.

maglie calcio poco prezzo says:

August 20, 2018 at 5:47 pm

You’re an extremely beneficial website; couldn’t make it without ya!

best forex robots says:

August 20, 2018 at 6:25 pm

When was this posted?

Magliette Calcio Poco Prezzo says:

August 21, 2018 at 12:14 am

Just wanted to mention Now i’m grateful that i stumbled in your website.|

Magliette Calcio Poco Prezzo says:

August 21, 2018 at 12:45 am

Great looking internet site. Presume you did a great deal of your very own html coding.

maglie calcio says:

August 21, 2018 at 1:25 am

Love the site– very user pleasant and lots to see!

Stephing Hocking says:

July 24, 2019 at 7:16 am

Spicejet Dhaka office
SpiceJet Airlines Dhaka Office is located at Gulshan, Dhaka in Bangladesh. SpiceJet Airlines is the fourth largest airline in India. Currently operating in Bangladesh from Dhaka Airport to Kolkata. Find Dhaka sales office (GSA) / representative address of SpiceJet Airlines in Bangladesh.

Go Fly Ticketing

Bangladesh Address of SpiceJet Airlines
Find below customer care details of SpiceJet Airlines in Dhaka, including the address and telephone. You can book ticket, cancel or get offers on all flights operated by SpiceJet Airlines. Reach the SpiceJet Airlines customer service in the city for queries on reservation, refund, cancellation, baggage, rewards, or others.