JESSELL AT LARGE

Media Factored Into Trump Win In Many Ways

Trump's masterly use and abuse of the media helped propel him to victory in the race for the White House. While bashing reporters at his rallies as liars and closet Democrats, he threatened to crack down on big media mergers and weaken protections against libel suits. At the same time, he put the media to work for himself by commanding their attention at every turn.

Donald Trump, who vilified the news media even as he brilliantly manipulated them to rally his passionate followers, confounded pollsters and pulled off one of the greatest presidential upsets in American history, defeating odds-on favorite Hillary Clinton.

For once, the events got ahead of the numbers crunchers, pollsters and decision desks at the TV networks. Before they could make up their minds on whether Trump had amassed the necessary 270 electoral votes, Clinton conceded the election to Trump — a fact that CBS News reporter Major Garrett reported at 2:41 a.m. ET this morning.

It became official when shortly thereafter Trump walked on to a stage at the New York Hilton Midtown and gave a surprisingly gracious victory speech, praising Clinton for her toughness and service to America, promising to “bind the wounds of division” and thanking his supporters.

(Oddly, CBS News felt it had to superimpose a slide over the video midway through the speech to make its official announcement that Trump had won. By then, it was old news. Bolder than the networks, AP had called it for Trump at 2:30)

His improbable victory became increasingly apparent as Tuesday evening wore on and the Republican candidate began turning major battleground states like Florida, Ohio and North Carolina red.

By 1 a.m., it was Clinton who faced the long odds of having to “run the table” of the remaining big battleground states to pull out the victory.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

It was not to be.

A political novice, Trump made his fortune as a real estate developer, a brand and as reality TV star. (He hosted NBC’s The Apprentice and Celebrity Apprentice from 2004 to 2015).

But he has little love for the “mainstream media.” At his rallies, he made reporters the targets of ridicule and anger, charging that they were liars and in cahoots with the Clinton campaign.

“I’m not running against Crooked Hillary,” he said last summer. “I’m running against the crooked media.”

The attacks resonated. Making the rounds on social media this week was the picture of a Trump backer with a T-shirt that read: “Rope. Tree. Journalist. Some Assembly Required.

In his private business, Trump has been notoriously litigious. During the campaign, he threatened to sue the New York Times for reporting on his alleged serial groping of women.

If elected, he vowed to “open up libel laws” to make it easier to sue media, although making public figures more vulnerable to libel action would likely require a Supreme Court ruling.

When AT&T announced in October its $85 billion bid to buy Time Warner, Trump immediately said he would block the deal, noting that it owned CNN. “It’s too much concentration of power in the hands of too few.”

In the same speech, he threatened to revoke favorable sales tax treatment of Amazon, whose CEO Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post, and he said he would “look at breaking up” Comcast-NBCU.

That latter concentrates “too much power in one massive entity that is trying to tell voters what to think and what to do,” he said. “Deals like this destroy democracy.”

Along with Univision, Comcast cut business ties with Trump shortly after he kicked off his campaign last year by suggesting most Mexican immigrants were “rapists” and criminals.

Whether he follows through with such threats or any of the many other sometimes vague and contradictory promises he has made over the past 16 months remains to be seen.

Whatever his agenda, he will have Congress on his side. It turned out that he had coattails. The long night ended with the Republican Party poised to control not only the White House, but also to maintain control of the House and the Senate.

Like all presidents, Trump will derive much of his power from his ability to appoint more than 8,000 bureaucrats in the legislative and executive branches, starting with the cabinet. The jobs will all be listed in the so-called Plum Book that the government publishes after each presidential election.

Two of the plum jobs, that of attorney general and head of the antitrust division at the Justice Department, will have much to say over which media mergers pass muster and which do not.

Of greater importance to most media, including broadcasting and cable, is what will happen at the FCC.

President Trump will appoint a new chairman at the agency, either by elevating one of the two sitting Republican commissioners (Ajit Pai and Michael O’Reilly) or bringing in a third Republican after Democratic Chairman Tom Wheeler gives up his seat as is the custom.

One name that has emerged as at least an adviser on media matters is that of Jeffrey Eisenach, a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank. Politico described him as “an avowed crusader against regulation” and “an outspoken antagonist of FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler and his policies.”

Broadcasters may have one of their own at the table when appointments are being made and policy set. Stanley S. Hubbard, the CEO of Hubbard Broadcasting, was a six-figure contributor to the Trump campaign. “I think he’ll get rid of a lot of regulation and throw out a lot of the nonsense,” he told Fox Business News in June.

Trump not only upset Clinton, he also upset many axioms of modern presidential campaigns. He relied heavily on “earned media” generated by his unmatched ability to command their attention with one politically incorrect pronouncement after another and lampooning of opponents.

To the chagrin of many broadcasters, Trump did not raise as much money as the Republican nominee was expected to, so he didn’t spend as much on local TV spots.

It was Clinton who took the conventional route, raising as much money as she could and outspending her opponent by hundreds of millions of dollars.

Because Trump’s victory comes as a surprise to many and because he is the ultimate outsider with no Washington experience or history, pundits must now turn to speculating about the Trump presidency with little to go on.

“I think it is the beginning of a new era whose shape and form and content are not known to us and are not clear, whose personnel and exact direction are unknown,” said former Reagan speechwriter Peggy Noonan, who provided some of the color for the CBS News play by play.

Nonetheless, she added, “Something huge and incalculable has happened this evening.”


Comments (42)

Leave a Reply

Joe Jaime says:

November 9, 2016 at 9:10 am

If you watched the coverage on Fox…Brit Hume got it right. The American people saw the media basis and went to rescue the underdog. Lesson learned I hope! Also I watched Rachel Maddow on MSNBC… she almost had a breakdown trying to stomp out the results of the people. Yes, she is smart but she sounded like a Clinton campaign manager. Gald this is all over… let’s see if the press can get over it and give our new President a fair shot at leading our country.

    Scott Cote says:

    November 9, 2016 at 2:42 pm

    I wound up watching MSNBC, not because of their (apparent) politics, but because of their on-air look. It was the most uncluttered presentation I saw last night. I thought the FOX News look was horrendous. I am not a fan of Rachel Maddow, but her biased energy was interesting at first, Ultimately, “her pouting and meltdown” became childish. Even Maddow’s treatment of Nicole Wallace became unprofessional. I think NBC needs to reassess Maddow and other on-air talent. Otherwise, this network will be at constant odds with the new administration. Whatever our preferences, I believe most of us are sick of media bias.

    Scott Cote says:

    November 9, 2016 at 2:42 pm

    I wound up watching MSNBC, not because of their (apparent) politics, but because of their on-air look. It was the most uncluttered presentation I saw last night. I thought the FOX News look was horrendous. I am not a fan of Rachel Maddow, but her biased energy was interesting at first, Ultimately, “her pouting and meltdown” became childish. Even Maddow’s treatment of Nicole Wallace became unprofessional. I think NBC needs to reassess Maddow and other on-air talent. Otherwise, this network will be at constant odds with the new administration. Whatever our preferences, I believe most of us are sick of media bias.

    Scott Cote says:

    November 9, 2016 at 3:06 pm

    I wound up watching MSNBC, not because of their (apparent) politics, but because of their on-air look. It was the most uncluttered presentation that I saw last night. I thought FOX News looked terrible. I am not a fan of Rachel Maddow, but her biased energy was infectious (at first). Ultimately, “her pouting and eventual meltdown” became childish. Even Maddow’s treatment of Nicole Wallace became unprofessional. I think NBC needs to reassess Maddow and other key on-air talent. Otherwise, this network will be at constant odd with the new administration. Whatever our preferences, I believe we are all sick of media bias and will eventually reject a network for this kind of behavior.

    Veronica Serrano Padilla says:

    November 10, 2016 at 12:00 am

    Flipping through the networks, Faux News had to have the busiest, most annoying looking onscreen graphics. Most of the others weren’t much better. Most of the sets looked really busy and too glitzy.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    November 11, 2016 at 5:06 am

    Yes, we know how retro you are at your analog SD cable channel, so no wonder you hate state of the art graphics.

    Veronica Serrano Padilla says:

    November 11, 2016 at 12:57 pm

    There’s a big difference in state of the art graphics and busy, hard to read graphics.

Darrell Bengson says:

November 9, 2016 at 9:17 am

America voted to elect the worse of all evils, and unfortunately judging from past history it will be that the same people who believed Trumps rhetoric will be the people to pay dearest.

    Angie McClimon says:

    November 9, 2016 at 9:27 am

    When Trump does something his supporters won’t agree with, they have no room to complain. They brought this on themselves.

james abels says:

November 9, 2016 at 9:18 am

Hmmm… beat the DNC at it’s own game. As said, wait and see what happens. It seems the 1st amendment is OK if it reflects a certain party’s viewpoint.

    Angie McClimon says:

    November 9, 2016 at 9:28 am

    If history in the last 30 years has shown any pattern, an RNC win was to be expected after a 2-term DNC president.

    james abels says:

    November 9, 2016 at 10:38 am

    This should have been a win for Clinton. According to most major news outlets, Donald Trump had no redeeming qualities. So- what happened? By the way, the Obama administration did a number of things that I didn’t agree with. There was quite a few people that I know that felt the same way, and it made no difference if we complained.
    I have a wait and see right now.

Lisa Chambers says:

November 9, 2016 at 9:24 am

Nice seeing those smug faces eating crow. Now Kelly Anne Conway can write her ticket to anywhere she wants!

matt fess says:

November 9, 2016 at 10:47 am

Donald Trump was swimming against the media current from the beginning. False polling, weak and biased analysis. The mainstream media looked like idiots, and they were. Shameful journalism.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    November 9, 2016 at 6:24 pm

    Polling was not false. It was just bad. Big Difference. All the signs were there to see this coming. Polls were just not designed to capture it properly.

    John Bagwell says:

    November 10, 2016 at 10:58 am

    Insider is 100% correct here. How the polling was interpreted was wrong. The data was there.

Brian Bussey says:

November 9, 2016 at 11:27 am

The repeal of the Fairness Doctrine got us to this place. Now we get to watch America choke on it. Trump will be great of broadcast news. Unfortunately the news story will be another great depression or World War 3.

    james abels says:

    November 9, 2016 at 11:37 am

    If the fairness doctrine is re-instated, will both viewpoints be presented fairly? Don’t think so. Or maybe this country should be like China, or North Korea. It’s fair to their Dictators.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    November 9, 2016 at 6:22 pm

    @HopeUMakeIt. No the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine did not get us here. Hillary had every opportunity to talk to the press like Trump and she chose to hide – only giving a few interviews to friendly/softball journalist. Actually we are seeing America Choke on Obama’s failed policies. He was only US President to NEVER have a single year of 3.0% GDP Growth. Even 2 year Gerald Ford managed to do it. Most 2 termers had multiple years. All Obama’s legacy items have failed except first President of Color. 8 years and nothing to show for it. That’s why Trump won. They didn’t see the economy getting better with Hillary/Obama 3rd term. I agree with your fear of him doing something stupid but as stated last week, a Recession is coming no matter who was elected. America has NEVER gone 3 Presidential terms without one. I personally was hoping for HRC to take the blame for it, but such is life.

    John Bagwell says:

    November 11, 2016 at 9:58 am

    The easiest job in the world is to be a pundit for the winning party right after an election and just blame the policies of the current administration. Your point about the GDP is well taken and extremely valid. While I will not defend a majority of Obama’s policies (I disagree with most of them), he was able to get millennials and minorities to come out and vote for him. Twice. Hillary was not able to do this. If Hillary was able to get more minorities in swing state big cities like Milwaukee, Philly, Pittsburgh, Detroit, etc, to come out and vote for her like Obama did, then Tuesday’s results turn out differently. Hillary was a flawed candidate. Remember 2010? The Democrats got demolished in that election and yet Obama was reelected just 2 years later. Would Obama have been able to defeat Trump? We will never know and we don’t need to, but Obama will leave office (well, at least as of today) with an extremely high approval rating. I 100% agree that a recession was looming, regardless of who won.

    Brian Bussey says:

    November 17, 2016 at 1:13 pm

    Just saw your post. I would ask that you provide a example of America choking on a Obama policy. President Obama took the helm during a once in a generation economic meltdown that made 3% growth impossible. President Obama also had to work with a congress that put politics before the American people whom elected them. History will remember President Obama as a much more successful President than the guy who preceded him, even with no help from congress.

Ellen Samrock says:

November 9, 2016 at 11:31 am

Tom Wheeler: OUTTA THERE! This could usher in a new golden era for broadcasters, especially if Commissioner Pai moves into the chairman’s seat. But let’s be clear: Trump won in spite of the media, not because of it. In the end, they only injured themselves–and I would say irrevocably.

Gene Johnson says:

November 9, 2016 at 11:36 am

Yes, the experts and pundits got it wrong, but the polls weren’t quite as wrong as people suggest given that Clinton did win the popular vote, at least as of this morning. When you factor in the margin of error for the last round of polling, on a popular vote basis they weren’t exactly wrong. But they most certainly got wrong the anticipated results in “battleground” states. As for what is to come, while I hope for the best I fear for the worst. The Republicans will have two years to accomplish what they want. If they disappoint there could be a significant Congressional change in two years, as occurred during George W. Bush’s term. Given how long some things take to change in our system, and the unlikelihood of some of Trump’s proposals getting passed or accomplished (e.g., Mexico paying for the “wall” or its even getting built), many people may be quite disappointed. Bottom line, the reality is that nobody really knows what is going to happen after January 20 (or even leading up to it).

    james abels says:

    November 9, 2016 at 11:45 am

    You are correct about what is going to happen- we don’t know. Right now, quite a number of people are choking on things like the ACA. Maybe it was some of these issues that worked against Clinton in the end. It seems like the little fibs of the Obama Administration get a free pass, and perhaps people were tired of it. Don’t know if it will be any better in the Trump Administration, but I am hoping for the best, as I did with the Obama Administration.

Hugh Haynie says:

November 9, 2016 at 12:11 pm

Maybe, just maybe, sheltered celebrities and the LA and NYC media don’t accurately represent America.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    November 9, 2016 at 6:49 pm

    It’s been that way for Decades. Dukes of Hazzard died in NYC and LA,, but was a hit everywhere elsewhere in America. As Carville said on MSNBC last night, Trump Supporters were Clinton’s people in 1992 and he (Clinton, Bill) does not understand how he lost them.

kendra campbell says:

November 9, 2016 at 12:24 pm

Trump played the media like a master. CNN, MSNBC, and of course Fox News were all too eager to prostitute themselves for ratings and revenue. As CBS CEO Les Moonves said in February: “It may not be good for America, but it’s damn good for CBS.”

    Wagner Pereira says:

    November 9, 2016 at 6:05 pm

    CBS does not own a Cable a News Network. Was good for CBS because of the Ad Dollars spent by HRC and Pacs.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    November 9, 2016 at 6:52 pm

    And before RidgelineTV makes another stupid comment, CBSN is not Cable (and not making a profit).

    Veronica Serrano Padilla says:

    November 9, 2016 at 8:54 pm

    I see you’re getting your butt beat so bad you can’t keep posters straight. Maybe you should the doc for an Alzheimers test. Truly sad.

    Veronica Serrano Padilla says:

    November 9, 2016 at 8:56 pm

    And again, what’s up with all the capitalizations of non-proper nouns in your posts? You claim to be a high and mighty “insider” so you should have a better education than that.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    November 11, 2016 at 5:10 am

    As you hate “BUSY” graphics, no wonder you don’t get it. When comments section eliminate anything but 1 space, the CAPS make the posts easier to read. As for keeping track of Commentors, no issue with that. If it’s stupid, you most likely Posted it.

    Veronica Serrano Padilla says:

    November 11, 2016 at 12:51 pm

    Except you usually don’t post in all caps (which might make sense when stressing a point). With your lack of education it seems you can’t distinguish proper and non-proper nouns. And no, I don’t change user names like you do, I have no need to be dishonest.

Joe Jaime says:

November 9, 2016 at 12:34 pm

Sitting here right now looking at the DOW up 150 points….. what happened to the 5-7% Trump sell off that our media pundits were broadcasting all night? What a crystal ball!

    james abels says:

    November 9, 2016 at 3:04 pm

    Maybe people aren’t following the media lead to make the sell off a self fulfilling prophecy.

Wagner Pereira says:

November 9, 2016 at 6:07 pm

The sell off was real. You clearly have no access to the Futures and Globex.

Ellen Samrock says:

November 9, 2016 at 8:21 pm

So can we finally put to rest the unfounded rumor of Trump TV and all the idiotic speculation that swirled around it?

Joe Jaime says:

November 9, 2016 at 10:55 pm

I believe Trump will get all the cameras he wants