JESSELL AT LARGE

Top 30: Broadcasting’s Ever-Changing Profile

The urge to merge remains strong among TV station groups as evidenced by the changes in our annual Top 30 ranking published on Wednesday. And you should expect more changes on next year's chart, despite the FCC's meddlesome ownership rules.

So what do the following have in common?

Belo, LIN, Media General, Clear Channel, Young, Allbritton, Local TV, Journal, Freedom, McGraw-Hill, Granite, Barrington, Fisher, Landmark, Sunbelt, Pappas, Schurz, Montecito and CCA.

That’s right. They were all among the Top 50 station groups that we published in 2007, but which have since disappeared (or, as in the case of Media General, will soon disappear) in the waves of consolidation that have swept over the TV station business in the past decade.

More evidence of how much the industry has consolidated is to be found at the very bottom of the Top 30 we published on Wednesday. There you’ll find a group that is not even a group — Intermedia Partners, principal owner of a single station, WAPA San Juan. (I guess the fact that our Top 50 morphed into the Top 30 along the way is also telling.)

For our Top 30, we rank the groups by spot revenue estimates from the prior year supplied by our partner in the project, BIA/Kelsey. If we used household coverage as we once did, we would give a distorted picture of who’s who in commercial broadcasting. Ion Media, which operates more as a cable network, would be at the top of the list and religious groups like Trinity and Daystar would be near the top.

The story of this year’s Top 30 is Nexstar Broadcasting. By undercutting Meredith to grab Media General for $4.6 billion, Nexstar bulked up on stations and revenue and jumped from No. 13 to No. 3, behind only Fox and CBS. (Nexstar-Media General has yet to close, but, adopting BIA/Kelsey’s practice, we assume all announced deals will.)

BRAND CONNECTIONS

Nexstar’s rise and another big deal — Gray’s purchase of the Schurz’s stations — caused most groups of the chart to move up or down a rung or two. Gray itself rose two spots, taking over Nexstar’s old position at No. 13.

Despite all those vanished station groups listed above, it’s worth noting that the top 20 groups have been fairly stable over the past decade. Only four groups have departed that subset — LIN, Media General, Clear Channel and Belo.

Given that the TV broadcasting is some 70 years old and the propensity of industries to consolidate over time, the community of station owners should be much smaller than it is.

But the FCC has continually interfered with this natural process of contraction with its national and local ownership limits. The FCC has gradually loosened the rules over the years, permitting the consolidation we have seen so far in a sporadic fashion. But it hasn’t given up regulating ownership — far from it. It continues to govern the pace of consolidation.

Broadcasters enjoyed a rare legal victory last week in its on-going struggle for more freedom to wheel and deal when a federal appeals court vacated the FCC’s ban of joint sales agreements and told the FCC to take another look at it in the context of the congressionally mandated — and long-overdue — review of all its ownership rules.

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler has promised to move that review forward with some proposals for the other commissioners to consider by the end of this month. But broadcasters are not expecting any relief. In fact, some fear that Wheeler will not only proposed restoring the JSA ban, but also extend the ban to include shared services agreements. Goodbye to all those sidecar deals.

If the FCC keeps the national ownership cap (coverage of 39% of TV homes) in place as expected, the most aggressive consolidators — Nexstar and Sinclair — will not be able to get bigger, and, if the local limits are preserved or expanded as expected, mergers between smaller groups will be curtailed.

But not entirely.

The urge to merge is strong. The prevailing wisdom is that you have to have scale to deal effectively with MVPDs and the networks as well as technology and programming suppliers.

And there are plenty of permissible combinations among the mid-size and small groups. And broadcasters have proved adept at working around the ownership limits to get a deal done.

Broadcasters and industry watchers expect another round of consolidation after the lineup of stations is reduced and reset in the incentive auction and subsequent repacking of the TV band.

It’s not clear who will be buyers and who will be sellers.

Graham Media was seen as a seller. It has attractive stations, but only five of them, not enough to play in the land of giants.

But last week it stepped up not as a seller, but as a buyer — of two stations that Nexstar is being forced to spin off from its Media General merger to comply with ownership limits.

For $120 million, including assumption of debt, Graham will be getting WCWJ, the CW affiliate in Jacksonville, Fla., which it will operate in tandem with its news-heavy independent there, WJXT. It will also be moving into a sixth market, Roanoke-Lynchburg, Va., with NBC affiliate WSLS.

So, expect our Top 30 next year to present a new profile of broadcasting’s ownership class. Some groups will move up, some will move down and some will move out.

What do Block, Bonten, Waterman, Manship, Morris, Bonneville, Morgan Murphy, Cowles and Northwest have in common?

Right again. They didn’t quite make the Top 30 this year, but they are ready to step in should others fall from the ranks.

Harry A. Jessell is editor of TVNewsCheck. He can be contacted at 973-701-1067 or [email protected]. You can read earlier columns here.


Comments (23)

Leave a Reply

Tim Darnell says:

June 4, 2016 at 4:14 pm

Harry, despite the addition of religious broadcasters and the like, I think it would also be a service to your readership to have the Top 20 or Top 30 by households covered. It would not replace your Top 30 by spot revenue, but would supplement it.

    Linda Stewart says:

    June 4, 2016 at 7:11 pm

    That’s a good thought. We will do that next year. I’ve made a note to myself.

    Amneris Vargas says:

    June 4, 2016 at 10:27 pm

    EBITDA and DEBT/leverage too.

    Linda Stewart says:

    June 5, 2016 at 5:24 pm

    No can do. Most of the groups are not publicly traded.

Julien Devereux says:

June 6, 2016 at 3:10 pm

Why not consolidate? It’s worked SO well for Cumulus and the former Clear Channel.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    June 8, 2016 at 9:57 am

    As radio revenue growth has not kept up with GDP since 2000, you are talking Apple to oranges – especially in the last 8 years of sub 3% GDP growth of Obama – something unmatched by any other American President over their term. Guess that was the “change we could believe in”. Regardless, invest in a non-growth Industry like a Radio and that is what happens. Unlike the growth TV has seen in Revenue.

    Keith ONeal says:

    June 8, 2016 at 11:33 pm

    Yeah, right, Scott. Cumulus stock is practically worthless and will probably be delisted shortly. As for iHeartRadio (Clear Channel), all they can do now is pay interest on their Billions of dollars in debt. Their stock is also under $1 a share and will probably be delisted as well. I expect a lot of those stations in those two groups to go permanently dark within the next 5 years or so.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    June 9, 2016 at 1:44 am

    What an idiot. They will not go permanently dark. At worse, they will declare Chapter 11, wipe out all debt and continue broadcasting the exact same thing with $0 debt and margins of 35% – 50%.

    Veronica Serrano Padilla says:

    June 9, 2016 at 4:03 pm

    Just like your man Trump would do?? Leave someone else holding the bag?? If these stations are making margins as you say, why can’t they pay for themselves?? (and that was a serious question)

    Wagner Pereira says:

    June 9, 2016 at 11:50 pm

    Wow – you really don’t get it. Its amazing how you stay in business. Riddle me this, if a Group has ~$2.5B in Revenue and ~$1.4B in Expenses (or a 47% cash flow), is that not BIG money that anyone would envy (of course you will probably tell us your 11 hour a day Cable Channel in Bumbfuk makes that, lol). That’s GREAT money, but if you have a debt service of $21B, no way you can make it. But that IS NOT the fault of the Group’s Operation – and its close to 50% Margins.

    Veronica Serrano Padilla says:

    June 10, 2016 at 11:45 am

    I stay in business because I have ZERO debt… let me repeat that ZERO debt… Not that some debt can be good if manageable, but obviously Cumulus and IHeartRadio couldn’t figure out how to balance it out…

    Wagner Pereira says:

    June 10, 2016 at 3:44 pm

    Once again you prove your ignorance. They bought at the height of the Bubble. BTW, besides all the other Zeros, you also have ZERO audience on your part time Cable Channel.

    Veronica Serrano Padilla says:

    June 10, 2016 at 8:09 pm

    So they’re smart because they paid too much for stations and are about to go bankrupt and I’m dumb because I operate my station completely in the black… got it…

    Wagner Pereira says:

    June 11, 2016 at 2:30 pm

    Easy to operate a part time cable channel in towns of 800 residents. They bill more in 60 minutes than you will bill in your lifetime.

    Veronica Serrano Padilla says:

    June 11, 2016 at 4:08 pm

    More like 43,000 residents in my service area, but you have trouble counting – guess you run out of fingers and toes (like the problems you have with history… 40 acres and a mule, pioneers and such. LMAO)… Doesn’t matter how much one bills, running a small business is similar to a fortune 500 in that you can’t pay out more than you take in or you won’t last long. Maybe some big shot corporations need to learn that…

    Wagner Pereira says:

    June 12, 2016 at 8:40 pm

    Again, proving you do not know USA Hustory. Guess they do not have schools in towns of 800.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    June 12, 2016 at 8:41 pm

    History

    Veronica Serrano Padilla says:

    June 12, 2016 at 9:04 pm

    LMAO… You’re wrong again. You made a post saying that the “40 acres and a mule” had to do with pioneers out west… I called you out on it, pointing out that particular idea came about in the South after the Civil War. You were wrong, I was right. Guess they don’t have good school up there in Yankeeville…

    Wagner Pereira says:

    June 14, 2016 at 6:11 pm

    Glad you finally learned to use Google.

    Veronica Serrano Padilla says:

    June 14, 2016 at 6:55 pm

    No, I actually knew that from paying attention in school. What would be your excuse?

    Wagner Pereira says:

    June 15, 2016 at 2:13 am

    Clearly you haven’t because the reference was to the Government taking back 40 acres and mule that had been previously granted long after the fact. No difference than changing the rules to keep a Broadcast License provided serving in the Public Interest, Convenice and Necissity. But it takes someone with intelligence to understand that.

    Veronica Serrano Padilla says:

    June 15, 2016 at 10:17 am

    The original concept of 40 acres and a mule was to GIVE those to former slaves. Contrast that to broadcasting where the FCC NEVER GAVE spectrum to any broadcaster. They were granted usage of the spectrum if they continued to serve in the public interest. While perhaps the requirements have changed over the years there’s nothing similar in your argument.

    Wagner Pereira says:

    June 17, 2016 at 6:41 am

    Again you fail Business 101. The Broadcast licenses were GRANTED to those licensees to develop a system to Broadcast in the Public Interest, Convenience and Necessity. The Grant implied to spend money and develop the medium – follow those keywords and principles – and your license will be renewed. It is exactly the same. You cannot grant something and then take it away if the basis for the grant has not changed. Exactly the same. Sorry.