NAB Urges TV Band Repack By Region

Like AT&T, the broadcast group says the most logical way to conduct the post-auction repacking of the TV band later this year is on a regional basis with the most populated regions going first. "Prioritizing the most highly populated markets will...minimize viewer disruption and confusion."

Seconding a proposal of AT&T, the NAB today urged the FCC to take a regional approach in repacking the down-sized TV band following the incentive auction later this year.

The regional approach  — repacking one region of the country at a time — is the logical way to go, the trade association says in a letter to the FCC.

It would minimize disruption of service to broadcasters and viewers and get the spectrum in the hands of the wireless buyers “as quickly as possible,” it says.

The regional plan should focus on the most populated regions first, it says.

“Delaying commencement of work in these markets may mean leaving the most complex transition projects until the end of the process, which risks creating extensive and otherwise avoidable delays in clearing the most valuable markets for forward auction bidders.

“Prioritizing the most highly populated markets will also help ensure that  broadcasters in those markets can engineer a smooth cut over to their new channels, which will minimize viewer disruption and confusion.”

BRAND CONNECTIONS

At the same time,it says, the regional plan “must be flexible and capable of rapid recalibration.

“While we support beginning work in the most populated regions and markets first, there will inevitably be instances where work must be performed in less populated markets to allow more crowded markets to transition.”

The NAB also calls on the FCC to prepare to the repacking and to be prepared to use its authority to settle disputes.

“The FCC will be indispensable in creating a plan for the transition, because there is likely to be disagreement both between, but more importantly within, the affected industries as to the appropriate path forward,” it says.

“For example, wireless carriers may disagree concerning which markets should be prioritized based on which markets are most important to individual carriers’ deployment priorities.”

In the incentive auction that begins next month, the FCC plans to buy the spectrum of hundreds of stations and then turn around and sell it to wireless carriers. Many of the hundreds of stations that choose not to participate in the auction will be assigned new channels in the smaller TV band.

They are the chief concern of the NAB.

“A smooth, well-coordinated and efficient transition will reduce disruption to viewers, make better use of limited resources, and help clear spectrum more quickly for use by winning bidders in the forward auction,” the NAB says.

“Without a plan in place, problems that could have been avoided will not be.”


Comments (5)

Leave a Reply

John McElfresh says:

March 21, 2016 at 3:47 pm

Why would anyone think the government could screw things up????

    Keith ONeal says:

    March 21, 2016 at 9:41 pm

    We already know that the Government can and will screw it up.

Teri Green says:

March 21, 2016 at 4:30 pm

stupid idea. The markets are interdependent on each other. You can know the impact of NYC on the surrounding markets, till it’s up and running. I recall many people warning of the problems of our current digital conversion and no one listened to them, yet they were totally correct.

People won’t do anything till forced to do so. Look at the prior digital conversion. Few converter boxes and new tuners were sold till the populus was forced to buy it. You need to change everything at once, cause you can’t see the actual impact till it’s up and running. The sooner the better.

Keith ONeal says:

March 21, 2016 at 9:56 pm

I have a BETTER proposal ~ Do the repack market by market. Start with DMA 1, New York City. After that, do DMA 2, Los Angeles, than DMA 3 Chicago, go on down the line on the DMAs, and finish with DMA 210 and the territories.

Thomas Hubler says:

March 22, 2016 at 6:57 am

Of course..no one has mentioned the impact of this change on satellite,cable and especially for all the smaller operators in any given market. Which is how MOST of our viewers get our signals…..


More News