JESSELL AT LARGE

Broadcasting Wins Big With NFL Deals

The contract renewals of NBC, CBS and Fox preserve for another nine years the mutually prosperous relationship between pro football and TV broadcasting. The extensions send a wonderful message about broadcasting and the network-affiliate partnership at the heart of it. They say that broadcasting is here to stay and will continue to be the dominant television medium. And it's all thanks to retransmission consent. Let's hope the FCC doesn't mess that up.

“The thing that I am most proud of … is that we will continue to be on free television,” NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell told reporters Wednesday following news that the league had signed new TV rights extensions with NBC, CBS and Fox. “I think it’s great for fans. It will continue to allow us to grow our audience.”

The deals preserve for another nine years the mutually prosperous relationship between pro football and TV broadcasting that really got going in 1958 when NBC enthralled America with its broadcast of the NFL Championship. Fullback Alan Ameche won the game for the Baltimore Colts with a two-yard plunge into the end zone in sudden death overtime. Mercifully for the local New York Giants’ faithful, the telecast was blacked out in New York.

It’s been called the Greatest Game Ever Played, and it may have been — up to Dec. 28, 1958. But there have been many other televised thrillers since and every fan has his or her favorite. I go with the Immaculate Reception or John Riggins’ fourth-and-one dash in Super Bowl XVII. The memorable moments keep piling up. Did you happen to see the Rev. Tebow’s lastest fourth-quarter comeback against the Bears on Sunday?

Now we know the long and happy tradition will continue at least until 2022. That’s when the new nine-year extensions are set to end. (There are still two seasons remaining on the current contracts.)

Without doubt, the NFL is the biggest programming prize in television. Each week, the games attract huge numbers of people in the primes of their product-consuming lives. Last week, NBC’s Sunday Night Football was TV’s No. 1 show. Nothing else was close. And fans tend to watch football live, commercials and all. If they use DVRs, its only so they can watch the game (and a lot of the commercials) a second of third time.

The Super Bowls are cultural phenomena, drawing tens of millions of viewers even when the games are lousy. And lately the games have been anything but lousy.

BRAND CONNECTIONS

“The product is so important, and it’s such a foundation for CBS that the longer we can lock it up, the better it is for us,” CBS Sports Chairman Sean McManus told the New York Times.

This kind of programming doesn’t come cheap. Under the new deals, the networks combined will pay on average a little more than $3 billion a year for pretty much the same packages. CBS and Fox get the Sunday regional games, NBC gets Sunday nights and they all take turns with the Super Bowl. The $3 billion-plus translates to more than a 50% increase over what the networks are paying now.

The extensions send a wonderful message about broadcasting and the network-affiliate partnership at the heart of it. They say that broadcasting is here to stay and will continue to be the dominant television medium. It’s not going to be cable or satellite or streaming or mobile apps or anything else the technologists conjure up over the next decade. It’s going to be broadcasting — the biggest media stage of all.

To me, the message is loud and clear. But not everybody seems to hear it. The current FCC, for instance, is driving a spectrum policy that treats broadcasting as if it were an artifact of a bygone era, something to be tolerated and then gently led into the home of forgotten media with 45s and eight-track players.

Unlike FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, Goodell, I think, sees that the over-the-air element of TV broadcasting is not incidental, but central. It means that everybody everywhere gets to watch the home team free or charge and build a lifetime of loyalty. Check that Goodell quote up top again: “It will continue to allow us to grow our audience.”

Wall Street investors also seem to be deaf to the power of broadcasting. Perhaps mesmerized by the gadgetry of Silicon Valley and uncertain about the steadiness of the retransmission consent revenue stream, they have been eschewing the pure plays and devaluing companies with large broadcasting components.

“For 30 years, we’ve been reading about the possible demise of broadcasting,” said NAB spokesman Dennis Wharton. “They were wrong then, and they’re wrong now.”

That broadcasting is still in the game is due to retransmission consent. It’s has given the TV the wherewithal to compete with cable networks that have always enjoyed the dual revenue stream — advertising and programming fees from operators.

In 1992, Congress granted TV stations the power to stop cable operators from retransmitting their programming without permission — that is, without compensation. It was slow coming, but broadcasters collectively are now getting more than a billion dollars a year in retransmission consent revenue.

Affiliates haven’t much liked the idea of sharing their hard-earned retrans dollars with the networks. But they really can’t complain much now. They can see where the money is being spent. Strong networks make strong affiliates.

According to SNL Kagan, in 2014, the first year of the new nine-year deals, Fox will collect $704 million in retrans fees, $408 million directly from its O&Os and $296 million through its affiliates. The total retrans jumps to $800 million in 2015. The CBS and NBC figures are lower, but have similar trajectories.

SNL Kagan’s forecasting ends with 2015, but I don’t think that it is much of a leap to say that retrans will likely more than cover each of the networks’ entire NFL liability and then some in the out years.

That’s, of course, if the FCC doesn’t screw things up by tampering with the retrans rules and upsetting the negotiating balance.

As I have written here before, TV broadcasting has been decimated by the loss of big-time sports to cable over the last three decades — boxing, baseball, basketball, college football. With its bloated programming fees, ESPN even managed to insert itself into the NFL picture in the late 1980s. It took over Monday Night Football from poor corporate cousin ABC in 2006.

I’m still smarting over CBS’s failure to hang on to the NCAA’s basketball finals in early 2010. Under the 14-year contract, CBS will alternate the Final Four with Turner staring in 2016. Maybe CBS was looking ahead, saving powder for the big prize.

In any event, thanks to retrans and an unflagging faith in their own futures, NBC, CBS and Fox have finally stopped cable way out of field goal range.


Harry A. Jessell is editor of TVNewsCheck. You may contact him at 973-701-1067 or [email protected].


Comments (11)

Leave a Reply

Jonathan Lemire & Laurie Kellman says:

December 16, 2011 at 3:57 pm

This was a win-win for Broadcast TV and the NFL. The price is enormous as are the ratings. Broadcast is good for the NFL and the NFL is good for Broadcast. The real winner is the fans as they will be able to watch Sunday NFL football for free for another decade. Thanks to both the NFL and the Networks.

    Tanya Pavluchuk says:

    December 16, 2011 at 4:06 pm

    Too bad you can’t say the same for MLB & the NBA.

Manuel Morales says:

December 16, 2011 at 4:27 pm

Paging Matt Polka. Matt Polka to the white courtesy phone please.

Grace PARK says:

December 16, 2011 at 5:18 pm

Free, Harry? Really? Who pays for retrans consent? We do. No such thing as free anymore. This is all spin.

    Andrea Rader says:

    December 16, 2011 at 6:04 pm

    Quite right. Broadcasters will continue to pay extortionate rights fees – and pass them along to cable and satellite subscribers – until the FCC takes the retrans punch bowl away. And then what will happen? It doesn’t take a genius to figure it out.

    Manuel Morales says:

    December 16, 2011 at 7:19 pm

    And then what happens? Well if your fantasy were to come true all the sports would go to ESPN and cable bills would continue to rise.

    Andrea Rader says:

    December 17, 2011 at 12:44 am

    Don’t get me wrong; I’m sympathetic to the broadcasters’ plight with respect to runaway sports rights fees . But counting on the Genachowski FCC to share that sympathy when the Chairman has already demonstrated a pattern of hostility towards any use of spectrum that doesn’t involve payoffs to the federal government and a monthly fee from subscribers is hopelessly naive.

    Linda Stewart says:

    December 18, 2011 at 9:21 am

    Terry, it’s free for the price of an antenna.

    Andrea Rader says:

    December 18, 2011 at 9:22 pm

    Harry, you’re missing the point. If it’s free for the price of antenna while cable and satellite companies have to pay, there’s a differential (and a fast-growing one) that may become untenable on Capitol Hill. Already there are rumblings to that effect as your article indicates. How long can broadcasters continue to justify this differential treatment as cable and satellite subscribers get more and more frustrated by the constant skirmishes at renewal time?

jeff lee says:

December 17, 2011 at 8:06 pm

It becomes more “free” when you dump multi-channel providers.

jeff lee says:

December 17, 2011 at 8:15 pm

If you were someone who offered a product for free to the public, wouldn’t you be a little PO’ed if someone was taking it and repackaging it and selling it for a profit? If you don’t like it – drop it (cable/sat).

I had cable years ago back when channels had very little commercials. Now it’s all reruns of Broadcast TV and a ton of commercials. These cable channels make money buy selling time & get paid from the multichannel providers. Broadcasters have a product as well “for free” – why should someone else be allowed to sell it and not be compensate the people who provide it? Sounds like stealing to me.